Education Use Only
For educational use only — Not for clinical decision-making without independent verification
Medical Associates  ·  Department of Nephrology ← urinenephrology.org
Nephrology Education Series

CRRT Principles and Management

Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP UICOMP · UDPA · Butler COM 2026-02-28 11 min read

CRRT Principles and Management

Overview

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) represents a gentler, continuous approach to renal replacement in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients. Unlike intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), CRRT provides gradual, sustained removal of water and solutes over 24 hours, reducing hypotension and permitting higher net fluid removal in patients with sepsis, cardiogenic shock, and multi-organ failure. Understanding CRRT modalities, dosing, and complications is essential for intensive care nephrology practice and board examination [1][2].

High-Yield Board Point

CRRT indications: hemodynamic instability, cerebral edema, hyperammonemia (acute liver failure), sepsis-induced AKI. Standard dose: 20-25 mL/kg/h delivered dose (prescribed dose higher to account for circuit loss). Anticoagulation: Regional citrate preferred over systemic heparin (avoids bleeding in coagulopathic patients). Modalities: CVVH (convection), CVVHD (diffusion), CVVHDF (combined convection + diffusion). Transition to IHD when hemodynamically stable or if CRRT-specific complications (bleeding, thrombosis) develop [1][2].

CRRT Modalities: Mechanisms and Indications

Veno-Venous (VV) Accesses

CRRT requires veno-venous access: dual-lumen catheter in femoral, internal jugular, or subclavian vein; blood withdrawn continuously, processed through filter/hemofilter, then returned to venous circulation.

Why veno-venous (not arterio-venous)? [3] - Avoids need for arterial puncture (risk of pseudoaneurysm, steal, infection) - Pump drives circulation (arterio-venous relied on arterial-venous pressure gradient; slower, less reliable)

CVVH (Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration)

Mechanism: Ultrafiltration-driven removal; relies on convection; membrane has large pores; solute removal by sieving (solutes move with filtered fluid).

Fluid flows: - Blood flow: 150-250 mL/min - Ultrafiltrate removal: 20-25 mL/min (prescribed rate) → 1-1.5 L/hour - Replacement fluid: Infused post-filter (post-dilution; dilutes filtrate already removed) or pre-filter (pre-dilution; less efficient but may improve membrane life) [3]

Solute clearance mechanism: - Convection: Solutes move WITH fluid across membrane - Sieving coefficient: Varies by solute (small solutes approximately 1.0, large proteins <0.1) - Relative strength: Good for small/medium molecules (Na, K, urea, creatinine); less effective for large molecules [3]

Disadvantages of CVVH alone: - Middle-molecule and larger solute removal may be inadequate (phosphate, beta-2 microglobulin) - Requires high ultrafiltration rates (1-2 L/hour) to achieve adequate small-solute clearance

Use: Combined with other modalities; rarely used as monotherapy [1]

CVVHD (Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis)

Mechanism: Diffusion-driven removal; membrane has small pores; solute removal by concentration gradient (similar to intermittent HD).

Fluid flows: - Blood flow: 150-250 mL/min - Dialysate flow: 16-33 mL/min (1-2 L/hour) — countercurrent to blood - Ultrafiltrate: Minimal (patient-driven fluid removal only, not pump-driven)

Solute clearance mechanism: - Diffusion: Solutes move DOWN concentration gradient (high in blood, low in dialysate) - Clearance independent of ultrafiltration rate: Driven by dialysate flow and dwell time - Relative strength: Excellent for small solutes (urea, creatinine, K); dependent on dialysate concentration

Disadvantages: - Less effective for fluid removal in anuric patients (must rely on patient ultrafiltration need) - Patients with minimal urine output may be inadequately treated

Use: Combined with ultrafiltration component for better fluid removal [1]

CVVHDF (Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration)

Mechanism: Combined convection + diffusion; uses both ultrafiltration (convective removal) and diffusion (via dialysate).

Fluid flows: - Blood flow: 150-250 mL/min - Ultrafiltration: 20-25 mL/min (patient/pump-driven) - Dialysate flow: 8-33 mL/min (1-2 L/hour) - Replacement fluid: Post-filter (after hemofilter)

Solute clearance: - Convection (from UF) + Diffusion (from dialysate) - Best of both worlds: Efficient small-solute removal via diffusion + convection; good fluid removal - Clearance: Typically 25-35 mL/kg/hour (higher than CVVH or CVVHD alone)

Advantages: - Superior solute removal for broad molecular weight spectrum - Excellent fluid removal capability - Most physiologic mimicry of native kidney function

Disadvantages: - Most complex; requires pump, dialysate delivery, UF pump control - Highest cost; requires skilled personnel

Use: Preferred modality in most ICUs [1][2]

CRRT Dosing

Prescribed vs. Delivered Dose

Critical distinction: Prescribed dose ≠ delivered dose due to: - Circuit downtime (procedures: imaging, bedside ultrasound, placement of other lines) - Circuit thrombosis → filter clotting - Fluid bag changes, line troubles - Dialysate/replacement fluid changes

Typical delivered dose: 70-90% of prescribed dose (account for ~15-20% downtime) [1].

KDIGO/ATN Trial Evidence on Dose

The ATN Trial (2008): Randomized 1,124 critically ill AKI patients to: - More intense CRRT: 35 mL/kg/hour - Less intense CRRT: 20 mL/kg/hour

Results: No difference in mortality, ICU LOS, or renal recovery between 20 vs. 35 mL/kg/hour [2].

RENAL Trial (Australia/New Zealand): Confirmed no benefit to high-dose (40 mL/kg/hour) vs. standard-dose (25 mL/kg/hour) CRRT [2].

Current KDIGO Recommendations

Standard CRRT dose: 20-25 mL/kg/hour delivered dose [1][2]

  • Body weight calculation: Use actual dry body weight (if obesity, may adjust)
  • Achieved via: CVVHDF with UF + dialysate, or high-volume CVVH
  • Frequency: Continuously (24 hours); equivalent to ~120-150 mL/kg/week
  • No benefit to doses >25 mL/kg/hour
Key Point

Higher CRRT dose does NOT improve mortality or renal recovery. Standard 20-25 mL/kg/hour is recommended. Focus on achieving this dose consistently (minimizing circuit downtime) rather than escalating above standard dose [1][2].

Anticoagulation Strategies

CRRT circuits are highly thrombogenic (blood contact with synthetic membrane, slow flow in large lines). Anticoagulation is essential to prevent circuit clotting and maintain filter life.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA) — PREFERRED

Mechanism: - Citrate infusion pre-filter: Binds calcium → chelates ionized Ca → blocks coagulation cascade in circuit - Calcium reinfusion post-filter: Restores serum calcium to normal (systemic coagulation normal; circuit anticoagulated) - Calcium removal in ultrafiltrate: Modest (some calcium in replacement fluid)

Advantages: - Most effective: Longest filter lifespan (7-10 days; vs. heparin 1-3 days) - Safest: No systemic anticoagulation; reduced bleeding risk (critical in coagulopathic/post-op patients) - No heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) risk - Reduced thrombotic complications in high-bleeding-risk patients

Disadvantages: - Complex; requires meticulous monitoring - Citrate-induced metabolic alkalosis (if citrate not fully metabolized) - Hypocalcemia risk if post-filter calcium infusion inadequate; conversely, hypercalcemia if excessive calcium replacement - Hypernatremia (sodium in citrate solutions) - Hypophosphatemia (phosphate rapidly removed; may need supplementation) - Hepatic impairment: Citrate metabolism impaired → citrate accumulation, calcium chelation

Monitoring (RCA): - Baseline: Baseline Ca, phosphate, Na, Mg, acid-base, albumin - Daily: Ionized calcium (pre-filter >2.0 mEq/L, post-filter 1.1-1.3 mEq/L), acid-base, electrolytes, albumin, PT/INR - Citrate level: If citrate accumulates (can measure plasma citrate; rarely needed clinically) - Calcium balance: Track calcium in/out; adjust post-filter calcium infusion

Circuit citrate protocol: - Citrate infusion rate: ~160-180 mEq/liter blood flow (or ~3 mL citrate/100 mL blood) - Post-filter calcium: ~3 mEq/liter of dialysate/replacement fluid - Regional anticoagulation achieved; systemic citrate/calcium balanced [1]

Systemic Anticoagulation (if RCA contraindicated)

Unfractionated Heparin (UFH): - Bolus: 50-100 units/kg pre-filter - Infusion: 10-20 units/kg/hour maintenance - Monitoring: aPTT (goal 45-60s, regional target) - Disadvantages: HIT risk (approximately 3-5%) [4], increased bleeding risk, shorter filter life [4]

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH): - Less used in CRRT (less reversible than UFH); enoxaparin if necessary - Monitoring: Anti-Xa levels

Direct thrombin inhibitors: - Argatroban: If HIT; used in select ICUs [1]

Anticoagulation-Free CRRT

Rationale: Some patients are coagulopathic (DIC, liver failure, post-op bleeding); anticoagulation contraindicated.

Technique: - Frequent filter changes (1-2x/day) due to circuit clotting - Saline flushes every 4 hours to maintain patency - Higher cost (multiple filters) and labor-intensive - Avoid if possible; usually temporary until coagulation corrected [1]

Electrolyte and Acid-Base Management

Replacement Fluid Composition

Standard composition (varies by product; example):

Electrolyte mEq/L Purpose
Sodium (Na+) 140 Prevent hyponatremia; matches plasma
Potassium (K+) 0-4 Prevent hyperkalemia; can adjust (low K+ formulation available)
Calcium (Ca2+) 2.5-3.5 Prevent hypocalcemia
Magnesium (Mg2+) 1.0-1.5 Prevent hypomagnesemia
Chloride (Cl-) 110-120 Prevent hyperchloremic acidosis
Bicarbonate (HCO3-) 25-35 Buffering; prevent acidosis
Phosphate (PO4) 0 Usually absent; monitor; may need supplementation
Glucose (Glu) 100-200 Varies; standard formulations have minimal glucose

Acid-Base Considerations

Hyperchloremic acidosis risk: - High chloride in replacement/dialysate → hyperchloremia → metabolic acidosis - Solution: Use balanced replacement fluids (lower Cl-, higher HCO3-) when possible

Citrate-induced alkalosis: - Citrate metabolism → HCO3- generation - Solution: Monitor pH; adjust citrate infusion rate; use citrate-free patients in liver failure

Metabolic acidosis: - If persistent, increase dialysate HCO3-; ensure adequate citrate metabolism

Phosphate Management

Phosphate rapidly removed in CRRT (no bound fraction; fully filtered).

  • Risk: Hypophosphatemia (can cause respiratory failure, rhabdomyolysis if severe)
  • Monitoring: Phosphate levels daily; if <2.0 mg/dL, add phosphate to replacement fluid or dialysate
  • Supplementation: Available in some formulations; standard products often lack phosphate

Dextrose in Replacement Fluid

Most CRRT replacement fluids have minimal glucose (100-200 mg/dL equivalent). Hyperglycemia common in ICU from stress and glucose administration; usually managed with insulin, not increased glucose in CRRT fluids [1].

Drug Dosing During CRRT

Renally Excreted Drugs

CRRT clearance varies by: drug characteristics, CRRT modality (CVVH > CVVHD), flow rates.

General principles: 1. Standard dose drugs unlikely to accumulate during CRRT (e.g., cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones) 2. Drugs requiring adjustment: Vancomycin, aminoglycosides, antivirals (acyclovir, ganciclovir), anticoagulants 3. Recommendation: Check drug-specific dosing; consider TDM (therapeutic drug monitoring) for critical drugs

Examples: - Vancomycin: Empiric dosing in CRRT differs from IHD; target trough 15-20 µg/mL; check levels - Aminoglycosides: Extended-interval dosing more suitable; CRRT continuous clearance changes kinetics - Antivirals: Acyclovir adjusted based on CRRT dose; risk of crystal nephropathy if under-dosed - Anticoagulants (UFH, enoxaparin): Clearance variable; monitor aPTT/anti-Xa as needed

Tools: Renal dosing databases (e.g., KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes); pharmacist consultation recommended [1]

Nutrition and Metabolic Support

Caloric and Protein Requirements

CRRT patients typically hypercatabolic (sepsis, trauma, severe illness).

  • Energy: 25-35 kcal/kg/day
  • Protein: 1.5-2.0 g/kg/day (higher than non-critical CKD due to losses in ultrafiltrate and increased metabolism)

Nutrient Losses in CRRT

Ultrafiltrate contains: - Amino acids (5-10 g/day loss) - Water-soluble vitamins (B vitamins, vitamin C) - Trace elements (zinc, selenium, iron) - Glucose (if using glucose-containing dialysate)

Replacement strategy: - High-protein supplementation (enteral preferred over parenteral) - Multivitamin supplementation daily - Trace element supplementation (zinc, selenium especially) [1]

Glucose Management

Tight glycemic control (glucose 80-110) not superior to moderate control (140-180) in ICU; target <180 mg/dL typically. CRRT allows any dextrose concentration in replacement fluid; insulin requirements usually necessary [1].

Transition from CRRT to Intermittent Dialysis

Timing of Transition

Hemodynamic stability indicators: - Vasopressor requirement decreased/discontinued - Systolic BP consistently >90 mmHg without pressors - Urine output improving (if recovering AKI) - Acidosis/hyperkalemia controlled

Transition protocol: - Start with 2x/week intermittent HD sessions (short/low-efficiency) - Continue CRRT on off-dialysis days initially - Gradually reduce CRRT to PRN and discontinue as IHD adequacy achieved - May take 3-7 days to fully transition [1][2]

CRRT Complications

Complication Mechanism Management
Circuit thrombosis Coagulation activation; slow flow; inadequate anticoagulation Inadequate anticoagulation (heparin check); filter replacement; increase heparin/citrate
Bleeding Systemic anticoagulation (heparin); coagulopathy underlying Reduce anticoagulation if possible; transfuse if Hgb <7; consider RCA if bleeding severe
Catheter complications Infection, thrombosis, stenosis, malposition Sterile technique; monitor; replace if infected
Hypernatremia Sodium in citrate or dialysate solutions; fluid removal net sodium loss Monitor serum Na; adjust replacement fluid composition; free water supplementation if needed
Hypocalcemia (RCA) Inadequate post-filter calcium infusion; citrate chelation Increase calcium infusion rate; monitor ionized calcium
Metabolic alkalosis Excess citrate metabolism; HCO3- in replacement fluid Reduce citrate; use low-HCO3- fluids; avoid hypokalemia (K+ wasting)
Hyperkalemia (if K+ >4 in fluid) Excessive K+ replacement Use K-free replacement fluid; monitor K+; may need dialysate K+ adjustment
Hypothermia Infusion of cold replacement fluid Use inline warmer for replacement fluid
Hemodynamic instability Excessive fluid removal; sepsis worsening Reduce UF rate; improve sepsis management; vasopressor support

References

  1. Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ, et al. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):7-20. PMID: 18492867
  2. RENAL Replacement Therapy Study Investigators; Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, et al. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(17):1627-38. PMID: 19846848
  3. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. PMID: 22890468
  4. Gattas DJ, Rajbhandari D, Bradford C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of regional citrate versus regional heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1622-9. PMID: 25853591

Educational Resources

  • Student Guide: Dialysis Student Guide — PA/medical student educational guide
  • Student Guide: Dialysis Hub — PA/medical student educational guide
  • Student Handout: Crrt — PA/medical student educational guide