Education Use Only
For educational use only — Not for clinical decision-making without independent verification
Medical Associates  ·  Department of Nephrology ← Maintenance Hemodialysis  ·  urinenephrology.org
Clinical Mastery Series  ·  Maintenance Hemodialysis

Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation in HD

Whether to anticoagulate, apixaban versus warfarin, the apixaban dose question, left atrial appendage occlusion, and bleeding at the chair, with a short lipid-lowering update.
Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP UICOMP · UDPA · Butler COM Reviewed September 2026 22 min read

Part of the Maintenance Hemodialysis mastery module. Reviewed September 2026. Trial statuses were checked against the ClinicalTrials.gov registry on 26 September 2026.

Bottom line

  • No randomized trial has yet shown that anticoagulating a hemodialysis patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) prevents strokes. The only completed trial with a no-anticoagulation arm, SAFE-D, was a 151-patient feasibility pilot 1. AVKDIAL was terminated at 50 patients with no results. DANWARD, SACK, and VISIONAIRE are recruiting, and SAFE-D2 had not opened as of 26 September 2026 2.
  • Bleeding outnumbers stroke roughly tenfold. In RENAL-AF, 1-year major or clinically relevant bleeding was 32% on apixaban and 26% on warfarin, against 3.0% and 3.3% for stroke or systemic embolism 3. Circuit heparin given on top of an oral anticoagulant is the dialysis-specific lever: in a 10-patient randomized crossover trial, none of 40 sessions without added circuit anticoagulation ended early 4.
  • Who to treat is a graded judgment, not a score threshold. A prior ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) favors anticoagulation (grade 2C). Without a prior stroke the decision is equipoise, and an informed decline is a valid choice (2C).
  • If you anticoagulate, apixaban is preferred over warfarin (2B). The two apixaban trials against a vitamin K antagonist found no significant difference either way; AXADIA-AFNET 8, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer, reported a safety HR of 0.93 and did not meet noninferiority 3,5. Warfarin in dialysis runs a time in therapeutic range of 44–58% 1,3,5, is linked to calciphylaxis 6,7,8, and bleeds more than apixaban in observational data 9,10.
  • The apixaban dose is genuine equipoise (2C). The FDA label gives 5 mg twice daily unless the patient is 80 or older or weighs 60 kg or less 11. At steady state on hemodialysis, 2.5 mg twice daily reproduces the exposure of 5 mg in normal kidney function, and 5 mg overshoots it 12. No trial has compared the two doses.
  • Statins: no new randomized outcome trial of a lipid-lowering drug in dialysis has appeared. A target-trial emulation and cohort data report lower mortality with statins, strongest in established atherosclerotic disease, which supports the secondary-prevention carve-out (2C) without changing the advice against starting a statin for primary prevention 13,14,15.

Grades follow the KDIGO convention used in the source review: 1 recommend, 2 suggest; A (high) to D (very low) quality of evidence.

1. How common, and how dangerous

1.1 Prevalence

A 2012 systematic review of 25 studies put AF prevalence at 11.6% and incidence at 2.7 per 100 patient-years in kidney failure 16; in DOPPS, 12.5% of 17,513 randomly sampled hemodialysis patients had AF at enrollment 17. Implantable loop recorders detected AF in 41% of 66 patients over six months 18. The KDIGO controversies conference summarized the range as 15–40% 19.

Clinical pearl — the AF you see at the chair

Short, self-terminating AF during a run, with ultrafiltration, potassium shifts, and a falling calcium, is common. The EuDial working group argues that dialysis-related episodes that end on their own are not by themselves an indication for oral anticoagulation, because they occur while the patient is already heparinized 20. That is expert opinion. Document the rhythm off dialysis before starting a lifelong drug.

1.2 Stroke risk: higher, but is AF the reason?

In observational data, stroke ran at 5.2 versus 1.9 per 100 patient-years in dialysis patients with and without AF 16, and kidney replacement therapy carried a stroke or thromboembolism HR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.57–2.14) among Danish AF patients 21. An Italian cohort of 476, by contrast, found AF associated with death and not with stroke 22. The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline gives three reasons the link looks weaker in dialysis: the competing risk of death, undiagnosed AF among supposedly AF-free comparators, and the heparin patients receive three times a week 23.

1.3 Bleeding risk

In more than 38,000 DOPPS and PDOPPS patients, hospitalization or death from bleeding occurred at 4.5 per 100 person-years on hemodialysis; gastrointestinal bleeding was the commonest cause, and rates roughly doubled in patients with AF or other cardiovascular disease 24. Crude major-bleeding rates were 8.6 per 100 patient-years with an oral anticoagulant, 5.6 with an antiplatelet agent, and 4.1 with neither 25.

1.4 Why the risk scores fall short

CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were built in populations that excluded dialysis. A 2026 meta-analysis found pooled c-statistics of 0.70 for CHA2DS2-VASc predicting ischemic stroke in dialysis but only 0.55 for HAS-BLED predicting bleeding 26. HAS-BLED awards a point for dialysis itself 23, and the dialysis-specific BLEED-HD score did better (c-statistic 0.65 vs 0.59) 27. The larger problem is the threshold: general-population cut-offs do not identify which dialysis patients gain from anticoagulation 28, and untreated patients in an Italian cohort had fewer thromboembolic events than CHA2DS2-VASc predicted (4.9 vs 8.4 per 100 patient-years) 20. The UK Kidney Association (UKKA) suggests the scores not be used in isolation (2D) 29.

1.5 What practice looks like

Only 24.3% of 82,389 US hemodialysis patients with newly diagnosed AF started an oral anticoagulant within 90 days between 2007 and 2020 (34.1% in 2020), with Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients started less often than White patients 30. Only 57% of DOPPS patients on an anticoagulant at baseline were still taking one at 36 months 25.

2. Should we anticoagulate at all?

2.1 Observational evidence: two decades of contradiction

Every observational comparison of anticoagulation against none is confounded by indication: patients who receive a blood thinner were judged healthy, adherent, and at low enough bleeding risk to receive it.

Study (observational)ComparisonStroke or thromboembolismBleeding or death
Chan 2009, US, 1,671Warfarin vs noneNew stroke HR 1.93 (1.29–2.90) 31Death not different
Shah 2014, Canada, 1,626 aged 65+Warfarin vs noneHR 1.14 (0.78–1.67)Bleeding HR 1.44 (1.13–1.85) 32
Shen 2015, US Medicare, 12,284Warfarin initiation vs noneIschemic stroke HR 0.68 (0.47–0.99)Bleeding not different 33
Kai 2017, Canada, 888 matched pairsWarfarin vs noneIschemic stroke HR 0.68 (0.52–0.91)Death HR 0.76; no benefit with concurrent aspirin 34
Kim 2024, KoreaAnticoagulant vs noneIschemic stroke HR 0.61 (0.41–0.89)Major bleeding HR 0.99 35
Park 2025, Korea, 13,311Warfarin vs noneThromboembolism HR 1.25 (1.01–1.56) 36Least favorable net benefit
Mavrakanas 2020, USRDS, 521 vs 1,561Apixaban vs noneHR 1.24 (0.69–2.23)Fatal or intracranial bleeding HR 2.74 (1.37–5.47) 37
Winkelmayer 2026, US Medicare, 3,985 pairsApixaban initiation vs noneIschemic stroke HR 0.75 (0.57–0.97)Hemorrhagic stroke HR 1.55; clinically important bleeding HR 1.29; death HR 0.61 38
Critical appraisal — a mortality signal that is too good to be true

In the 2026 Medicare analysis, apixaban was used for a median of 59 days, yet all-cause death was 39% lower over a year of intention-to-treat follow-up 38. A 59-day exposure cannot plausibly do that through stroke prevention, particularly when ischemic stroke fell by only 25% and hemorrhagic stroke rose. The likelier explanation is selection: clinicians start apixaban in patients they expect to live. The stroke and bleeding hazard ratios are the informative part of the study.

Five meta-analyses of 15 to 42 studies each tell the same split story. None found a consistent reduction in stroke with warfarin or a DOAC against no anticoagulation 39,40,41,42,43. Warfarin increased hemorrhagic stroke (HR 1.49, 1.03–1.94) 39 and bleeding (HR 1.31–1.47) 40,41. Only apixaban 5 mg twice daily was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.67, 0.49–0.92) 42, a signal that rests on confounded dose selection (section 3.2).

2.2 Randomized trials of anticoagulation versus none (status as of 26 September 2026)

TrialDesignStatusResult or expected readout
SAFE-D (NCT03987711), Canada and AustraliaPilot: warfarin vs apixaban 5 mg twice daily vs none, 26 weeksCompleted; published 2025151 randomized at 28 centers; feasibility met, with 83% finishing in their assigned arm. One adjudicated stroke; major bleeding 4, 2, and 2; deaths 9, 2, and 4 (warfarin, apixaban, none). Not powered for outcomes 1
AVKDIAL (NCT02886962), FranceVitamin K antagonist vs noneTerminated for too few patients; 50 enrolledNo results posted; no results publication found 2,44
DANWARD (NCT03862859), DenmarkWarfarin (INR 2–3) vs none, open label; target 718RecruitingStroke or TIA; major bleeding. Primary completion estimated January 2027 2,45
SAFE-D2 (NCT07779746), Canada, Brazil, IsraelApixaban 5 mg twice daily (2.5 mg if age 80+ or dry weight 60 kg or less) vs none; target 848Not yet open; start estimated November 2026Stroke or systemic embolism at 5 years; completion estimated November 2031 2
SACK (NCT05679024), Sweden, Norway, Finland, IcelandApixaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs none in CKD stage 5 including dialysis; target 1,400RecruitingIschemic stroke or systemic embolism; completion estimated December 2027 2
VISIONAIRE (NCT06402851), BrazilWarfarin vs edoxaban 30 mg daily vs none; target 1,500RecruitingCompletion estimated December 2026, but the registry has not been updated since February 2025 2
Where this leaves the decision

There is no randomized evidence that any anticoagulant reduces stroke in hemodialysis patients with AF, and the observational evidence points both ways. The strongest case for treatment is a prior cardioembolic stroke or TIA, where anticoagulation is favored (2C). The strongest case against is prior major bleeding, frailty, or limited life expectancy 20,28. For a patient who meets the CHA2DS2-VASc threshold without a prior stroke, the decision is equipoise (2C): a shared decision with numbers, in which an informed decline is as valid as accepting treatment.

3. Which agent: apixaban, warfarin, and the rest

3.1 Randomized trials of a DOAC against a vitamin K antagonist

All three trials were small and open label. They rule out a large difference; they do not prove equivalence.

Trial (RCT)Design and fundingResult
RENAL-AF 2022US; apixaban 5 mg twice daily (2.5 mg if age 80+ or weight 60 kg or less) vs warfarin; n = 154, stopped early for enrollment. Investigator-sponsored, Bristol-Myers Squibb collaborator 2,31-year major or clinically relevant bleeding 32% vs 26% (HR 1.20, 0.63–2.30); stroke or systemic embolism 3.0% vs 3.3% (ARR 0.3%, NNT approximately 333, not significant); warfarin time in therapeutic range 44%. Underpowered by the authors’ statement 3
AXADIA-AFNET 8 2023Germany; apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs phenprocoumon; n = 97 (sample size revised from 222). Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer 5Safety composite (major or clinically relevant bleeding, or death) 45.8% vs 51.0% (HR 0.93, 0.53–1.65); noninferiority not met (P = 0.157). Efficacy composite 20.8% vs 30.6% (P = 0.51). Composites dominated by death 5
Valkyrie 2021Belgium; vitamin K antagonist vs rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with or without vitamin K2; n = 132; academic 46Cardiovascular events 63.8 vs 26.2 per 100 person-years (HR 0.41, 0.25–0.68) and major bleeding HR 0.39 with rivaroxaban; death and stroke not different. The composite was driven by non-stroke events, including limb ischemia 46

Pooled, the three trials show no difference against warfarin in the efficacy composite (RR 0.79, 0.45–1.37) or the safety composite (RR 0.81, 0.52–1.27) 47. Adding nine observational studies (31,238 patients), DOACs were associated with less major bleeding (RR 0.68), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.74), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.23), with no difference in ischemic stroke or death 48. In USRDS data, apixaban versus warfarin carried a major-bleeding HR of 0.72 (0.59–0.87), about 3 fewer major bleeds per 100 patient-years 9; five observational studies pooled gave a major-bleeding OR of 0.51 10.

3.2 Apixaban 5 mg or 2.5 mg twice daily

The label. The FDA label reduces the dose to 2.5 mg twice daily when two of age 80 or older, weight 60 kg or less, or serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or more are present. Every dialysis patient meets the creatinine criterion, so on hemodialysis the label gives 2.5 mg if age 80 or older or weight 60 kg or less, and 5 mg otherwise. The label states that its efficacy and safety studies did not enroll patients on dialysis and that the dialysis recommendation rests on pharmacokinetic data 11.

The pharmacology. The label is based on a single 5 mg dose in 8 hemodialysis patients 49. At steady state in 7 hemodialysis patients, 2.5 mg twice daily approximated standard exposure, a dialysis session removed only 4%, and 5 mg produced AUC and trough levels above the 90th percentile for 5 mg in preserved kidney function; the authors concluded 5 mg should be avoided 12.

The outcomes. All observational, with the dose chosen by clinicians. In USRDS data, 5 mg versus 2.5 mg was associated with lower stroke or embolism (HR 0.61) and death (HR 0.64) without more bleeding, but the patients given 5 mg were those judged robust enough 9. In another analysis of the same data source, the 5 mg subgroup did worse than no anticoagulation for both stroke and fatal or intracranial bleeding 37. In CKD stages 4–5, largely non-dialysis, 5 mg bled more (subdistribution HR 1.63) with no difference in stroke or death 50.

Expert bodies. The KDIGO controversies conference suggested considering 2.5 mg twice daily in CKD G5 and G5D until clinical safety data are available 19. The UKKA suggests apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or a vitamin K antagonist (2C) 29. The ACC/AHA guideline calls for “an evidence-based dose of apixaban” and cites the steady-state data favoring 2.5 mg 23.

The dose is genuine equipoise (2C)

No randomized comparison of the two doses exists, and the ongoing trials test each dose against no treatment rather than against each other 2. Both positions give 2.5 mg twice daily to a patient aged 80 or older or weighing 60 kg or less 11.

The case for 5 mg twice dailyThe case for 2.5 mg twice daily
It is the FDA label dose for patients under 80 who weigh more than 60 kg 11It reproduces standard exposure at steady state; 5 mg overshoots approximately threefold 12,51
Observational data associate it with lower stroke and death than 2.5 mg 9,40,42Those associations track who receives the higher dose, and other analyses found harm or excess bleeding with 5 mg 37,50
SAFE-D2 tests label dosing against no anticoagulation 2KDIGO conference, UKKA (2C), and AXADIA-AFNET 8 used it; SACK tests it 2,5,19,29

3.3 Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban

  • Dabigatran: avoid. It depends on kidney excretion and is substantially removed by dialysis 23. In 29,977 US hemodialysis patients, dabigatran starters had more hospitalization or death from bleeding than warfarin starters (rate ratio 1.48, 1.21–1.81) 52.
  • Rivaroxaban: one dialysis RCT, at 10 mg only. At full dose, starters bled more than warfarin starters (rate ratio 1.38) 52. A 10 mg dose in anuric hemodialysis patients matched the exposure of 20 mg in healthy volunteers 53, and 10 mg is what Valkyrie tested 46. KDIGO notes that the US label’s 15 mg dialysis dose rests on pharmacokinetics alone 19; 10 mg daily for AF is off-label in the United States.
  • Edoxaban: not outside a trial. Dialysis removes little of it 54, but there are no dialysis outcome data, and KDIGO lists it as not recommended below 15 mL/min 19.

3.4 Warfarin-specific harms

Poor INR control. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 44% in RENAL-AF 3, 50.7% in AXADIA-AFNET 8 5, 58% in SAFE-D 1, and 49.2% in a Canadian unit 55; in US Veterans Affairs data only 21% of dialysis patients reached a TTR of 60% or more 56. Warfarin users with no INR measured in the dialysis facility during the first 90 days had the highest stroke risk (HR 2.79, 1.65–4.70) 31.

Calciphylaxis. Vitamin K antagonists inhibit carboxylation of matrix Gla protein, a calcification inhibitor 44. Warfarin carried an OR of 11.4 for biopsy-confirmed calciphylaxis in a Japanese case-control study 6, and 52% of 253 cases in a German registry had received a vitamin K antagonist 8. The UKKA treats established calciphylaxis as a contraindication 29. Imaging calcification is a weaker argument: Valkyrie found no difference in calcification progression over 18 months between patients kept on a vitamin K antagonist and those switched to rivaroxaban 57.

When warfarin is still the right drug. Mechanical heart valves and moderate-to-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis, which DOAC trials excluded. For a patient on the deceased-donor transplant waiting list, the UKKA suggests a vitamin K antagonist because it can be reversed when an organ is offered (2D) 29.

4. Left atrial appendage occlusion

The extrapolated evidence. Across four general-population RCTs (3,116 patients), left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus oral anticoagulation reduced all-cause death (RR 0.78) and nonprocedural bleeding, with no difference in stroke 58. CHAMPION-AF 2026 (RCT, 3,000 patients, funded by Boston Scientific) reported 3-year nonprocedural bleeding of 10.9% versus 19.0% (ARR 8.1%, NNT approximately 12) with a noninferior efficacy composite 59. None of these trials reported dialysis results, and PRAGUE-17 excluded a creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min 20.

Dialysis observational data. An Italian prospective cohort reported thromboembolism HRs of 0.19 versus warfarin and 0.16 versus no anticoagulation 60. In USRDS data, LAAO versus anticoagulation was associated with less recurrent bleeding (HR 0.74) but not less stroke after adjustment (HR 1.18, 0.76–1.81) 61. The procedure itself is riskier with kidney disease (in-hospital mortality OR 2.76) 62. Nearly half of post-LAAO bleeding in the Italian cohort occurred in the first 3 months, on dual antiplatelet therapy 20.

LAAO trial in severe CKD or dialysisStatus as of 26 September 2026
WatchAFIB (NCT02039167), Germany: LAAO vs vitamin K antagonistTerminated for very poor recruitment; 14 enrolled 2
STOP-HARM (NCT02885545), Canada: LAAO vs anticoagulationWithdrawn; no participants recruited in more than a year 2
LAA-KIDNEY (NCT05204212), Germany, Belgium, Czech Republic: LAAO vs best medical care, net clinical benefit endpointRecruiting; the registry’s estimated completion date has passed without update 2,63

The Italian Society of Nephrology (2026) notes that no RCT has tested LAAO in hemodialysis and that peri-procedural complications are higher 64.

5. What the guidelines say

BodyStatement on dialysisStrength
ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS 2023 23It “might be reasonable” to prescribe warfarin (INR 2.0–3.0) or an evidence-based dose of apixaban; encourages shared decision-making pending trialsClass 2b, LOE B-NR
KDIGO controversies conference 2018 19Insufficient evidence to recommend warfarin in CKD G5D; consider apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily; reduce bleeding by minimizing heparin with dialysis, gastrointestinal prophylaxis when indicated, and stopping concurrent antiplatelets; re-evaluate annuallyConsensus, ungraded
UK Kidney Association 2025 29Anticoagulation “should be considered” (2C), and no anticoagulation “may be considered” (2C); apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or a vitamin K antagonist (2C); therapeutically anticoagulated patients initially dialyze without added circuit anticoagulation (2D); warfarin TTR target 65% or higher (1B); LAAO may be considered in selected patients (2B)Graded
EuDial 2024; Italian Society of Nephrology 2026 20,64Individualized balance of thromboembolic and bleeding risk; LAAO for high bleeding risk; dialysis-related AF episodes alone are not an indicationPosition statements
ESC 2024 65; ESC/ERA 2026 66Recommendation text not read for the source review. Secondary sources disagree: the UKKA says ESC gives no specific DOAC recommendation for dialysis 29, while a 2026 pro/con review describes a weak (class IIb) recommendation 44Not verified

6. Practical hemodialysis issues

6.1 Circuit heparin in a patient already anticoagulated

A standard heparin bolus and infusion doubles up in a therapeutically anticoagulated patient. In the only randomized data, Krummel and colleagues gave 10 hemodialysis patients on long-term oral anticoagulation four sessions each, with or without enoxaparin, in a crossover design: none of the 40 sessions ended early, and clotting scores did not differ 4. The UKKA suggests an initial heparin-free approach for these patients (2D) 29, and KDIGO lists minimizing heparin among bleeding-reduction strategies 19. The signs of circuit clotting on a heparin-free run are dark streaks in the dialyzer, clot in the venous chamber, and rising venous or transmembrane pressure.

6.2 Access bleeding

Anticoagulation lengthens needle-site bleeding, but prolonged bleeding after needle removal is also a KDOQI clinical monitoring sign of access dysfunction 67. Hold pressure without occluding flow, record minutes to hemostasis each session, and report a trend rather than attributing it to the blood thinner. The access pages in this module treat bleeding beyond the patient’s usual for three consecutive sessions as an outflow-stenosis signal: see Examining and cannulating the AVF/AVG and Catheter care, lock solutions, and bloodstream infection.

6.3 Gastrointestinal bleeding

Gastrointestinal bleeding is the commonest major bleed in dialysis (2.3 per 100 patient-years in DOPPS) 24, and apixaban is associated with less of it than warfarin (OR 0.61) 10. An unexplained fall in hemoglobin or a rising ESA requirement is often the first sign; see Anemia: targets, ESAs, and hyporesponsiveness.

6.4 Timing, procedures, interactions, and reversal

  • Apixaban does not need to be timed to dialysis. A session removes about 4% 12, and exposure is independent of dialysis timing 68. Doses are taken at the usual times on dialysis days, with no supplemental dose. A missed dose is taken the same day; never double 11.
  • Before procedures, the label advises holding apixaban at least 48 hours for moderate or high bleeding risk 11, but modeling in hemodialysis patients found 48–72 hours insufficient to reach negligible levels 68. Needle cannulation does not require a hold.
  • Interactions. Strong combined P-gp and CYP3A4 inhibitors call for dose reduction or avoidance, and strong inducers should be avoided 11. Adding a P2Y12 inhibitor to apixaban increased bleeding without reducing stroke or myocardial infarction 69; the source review suggests stopping aspirin when an anticoagulant starts unless an acute coronary syndrome or recent stent requires it (2C).
  • Reversal. Andexanet alfa reverses apixaban and rivaroxaban, idarucizumab reverses dabigatran, and prothrombin complex concentrate is used non-specifically 70. Hemodialysis does not meaningfully remove apixaban 11.

6.5 Falls

Older hemodialysis patients fall 1.60 times per person-year, with injury in 19% of falls 71. A pre-DOAC decision analysis found fall risk was not an important factor in choosing antithrombotic therapy 72, but subdural hematoma on hemodialysis carries 45.9% 1-year mortality, and 81% among patients previously on oral anticoagulants 73. Count falls, prevent post-dialysis hypotension (see Intradialytic hypotension and dialysate cooling), and send any anticoagulated patient with a head strike for same-day imaging.

6.6 The dialysate bath

A 3 mEq/L rather than 2 mEq/L potassium bath was associated with about 14% lower incident AF in older incident patients 74. In the ADAPT crossover trial, 3K plus sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on non-dialysis days lowered device-detected AF episodes versus 2K alone (rate ratio 0.52), though AF occurred in only 9 of 88 patients 75. See Dialysate potassium: bath selection and the rule of 7 vs 8; beta-blocker choice is covered in Treating hypertension on dialysis.

7. A decision pathway

Figure 1 condenses sections 1 to 6 into the source review’s sequence of questions and grades. It is an evidence summary for shared decisions, not a unit protocol.

flowchart TD
    A["AF or flutter documented<br/>OFF dialysis: 12-lead ECG,<br/>or 30 s or more monitored"] --> B("Only brief, self-terminating<br/>AF during treatment?")
    B -- Yes --> B1["No anticoagulation for<br/>that alone - 2D<br/>Check K bath, UF rate,<br/>calcium, magnesium<br/>Repeat ECG off dialysis"]
    B -- No --> D("Score CHA2DS2-VASc.<br/>Any hard stop?<br/>Prior intracranial bleed;<br/>major bleed in 12 months<br/>without a fixed cause;<br/>recurrent GI bleed or<br/>angiodysplasia; platelets<br/>below 50,000; survival<br/>under 1 year; comfort care")
    D -- Yes --> E["LAAO evaluation - 2C<br/>if prior stroke or<br/>CHA2DS2-VASc 4 or more,<br/>survival over 2 years,<br/>and fit for TEE or CT and<br/>a short antiplatelet course.<br/>Otherwise no anticoagulation<br/>- 2C; revisit in 12 months"]
    D -- No --> F("CHA2DS2-VASc 2 or more<br/>in men, 3 or more<br/>in women?")
    F -- No --> F1["No anticoagulation;<br/>reassess yearly"]
    F -- Yes --> G("Prior ischemic stroke,<br/>TIA, or systemic<br/>embolism?")
    G -- Yes --> H["Anticoagulation<br/>favored - 2C"]
    G -- No --> I["EQUIPOISE - 2C<br/>Shared decision with<br/>numbers; an informed<br/>decline is valid"]
    I -- Declines --> X["Declines: no<br/>anticoagulation; revisit<br/>every 12 months"]
    I -- Accepts --> K
    H --> K("Warfarin required?<br/>Mechanical valve;<br/>moderate-severe<br/>rheumatic MS; active<br/>deceased-donor waitlist")
    K -- Yes --> K1["Warfarin, INR 2-3,<br/>drawn at the chair<br/>Reassess if TTR<br/>below 65%<br/>Stop if calciphylaxis"]
    K -- No --> L["Apixaban over<br/>warfarin - 2B<br/>Dose 2.5 vs 5 mg<br/>twice daily:<br/>EQUIPOISE - 2C<br/>Label: 2.5 mg if age 80+<br/>or weight 60 kg or less"]
    K1 --> M
    L --> M["Stop aspirin unless ACS<br/>or stent requires it - 2C<br/>Heparin-free start -<br/>UKKA 2D<br/>Watch hemoglobin,<br/>bleeding, and falls<br/>Re-decide every 12 months<br/>and after any bleed, head<br/>strike, admission, or<br/>new antiplatelet"]
    style H fill:#d3f9d8,stroke:#2f9e44,color:#000
    style I fill:#fff3bf,stroke:#f59f00,color:#000
    style L fill:#fff3bf,stroke:#f59f00,color:#000
    style E fill:#d0ebff,stroke:#1971c2,color:#000
    style X fill:#e9ecef,stroke:#868e96,color:#000
    style F1 fill:#e9ecef,stroke:#868e96,color:#000
    style B1 fill:#e9ecef,stroke:#868e96,color:#000
Figure 1. Decision pathway for AF in a hemodialysis patient. Adapted from the source review; rounded boxes are questions, and yellow boxes mark equipoise. The hard-stop examples and LAAO criteria are the review’s graded positions (2C), not trial-derived thresholds. The heparin-free start is the UKKA suggestion (2D), and the annual re-decision follows the KDIGO controversies conference.
QuestionGraded position in the source reviewGrade
Brief AF only during dialysisNot by itself an indication; correct the triggers 202D
Prior ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism, no hard stopAnticoagulation favored; no RCT 23,33,34,35,762C
CHA2DS2-VASc threshold met, no prior strokeEquipoise; an informed decline is valid 31,32,36,37,382C
Hard stop to long-term anticoagulationNo anticoagulation; LAAO referral if prior stroke or CHA2DS2-VASc 4 or more and expected survival over 2 years 3,29,60,612C
AgentApixaban over warfarin 3,5,9,10,47,482B
Apixaban doseEquipoise between 2.5 and 5 mg twice daily 9,11,12,19,292C
Other DOACsAvoid dabigatran; edoxaban only in trials; rivaroxaban 10 mg off-label 19,46,52,53,542C

8. Lipid-lowering update

The statin evidence for dialysis, including the KDIGO 2013 positions and the negative 4D, AURORA, and SHARP-dialysis results, is on Cardiometabolic monitoring: lipids and statins, glycemic markers, and cardiovascular screening. This section adds what has been published since.

  • No new randomized outcome trial. A PubMed title search of 2021–2026 records (71 hits, 26 September 2026) found no randomized cardiovascular outcome trial of a statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitor, or inclisiran in dialysis. The nearest is a 14-patient, 12-week alirocumab study that lowered LDL cholesterol 45% with no clinical outcomes 77.
  • A target-trial emulation. In 3,019 statin-eligible Hong Kong patients with kidney failure, statin initiation was associated with fewer major cardiovascular events (intention-to-treat HR 0.78, 0.62–0.98) and a per-protocol ARR of 7% at 5 years (NNT approximately 14) 13. Dialysis-specific results were not reported, and a direction opposite to 4D and AURORA is the signature of healthy-user bias.
  • Cohorts. All-comer cohorts report associations too large for a statin to explain (composite HR 0.51) 78, or lower mortality without fewer cardiovascular events 79. In established atherosclerotic disease, pooled mortality HRs were 0.85 and 0.94 14,15.
What changes for statins

Primary prevention: no change. Do not start a statin or statin/ezetimibe for primary prevention in prevalent dialysis patients (KDIGO 2013, 2A); PCSK9 inhibitors have no dialysis outcome data 77,80. Secondary prevention: the carve-out gains modest support. After a myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease, starting or continuing a moderate-intensity statin is reasonable (2C) 14,15,81,82. Continue a statin the patient already takes (KDIGO 2013, 2C). Nothing supports LDL targets; an emulation of achieved LDL below 55 mg/dL 83 is not a basis for treating to target.

Evidence gaps

  • No completed, adequately powered RCT of any anticoagulant against none in hemodialysis 1,2.
  • The apixaban dose has never been randomized in dialysis. SACK (2.5 mg) and SAFE-D2 (label dosing, mostly 5 mg) test different doses against no treatment, not against each other 2.
  • LAAO has no dialysis RCT result, and the best post-implant antiplatelet regimen in dialysis is unknown 2,20,63.
  • Heparin-free dialysis on DOACs rests on a 10-patient crossover trial of older oral anticoagulants 4.
  • How much stroke in dialysis AF is actually caused by AF is uncertain, given competing mortality, thrice-weekly heparin, and non-cardioembolic mechanisms 23,28.
  • Current European guidance, the 2024 ESC AF guideline and the 2026 ESC/ERA guideline, was not read for the source review 65,66.

At the chair

Chair-side summary

For an anticoagulated patient, bleeding is the event you are most likely to see. Confirm the drug, the dose, and the time of the last dose at the start of every treatment. Follow the written heparin order, and on a heparin-free run watch the circuit for clotting 4,29. Time needle-site hemostasis and record the minutes; report a trend rather than blaming the blood thinner 67. For warfarin, draw the INR at the chair 31. Ask weekly about black stools, blood in urine or stool, nosebleeds, bruising, and falls 24,71. Apixaban is taken at the usual times on dialysis days, because dialysis removes very little of it 12,68. A head strike on a blood thinner is an emergency until proven otherwise 73.

Nursing card N14: The anticoagulated patient at the chair →

References

Adapted from the author’s canonical review Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in Maintenance Hemodialysis (reference-checked 2026-09-26; every journal reference matched to its PubMed record). Numbering is local to this page. Trial registrations are cited by NCT number; the apixaban label and the UK Kidney Association guideline have no PubMed record.

  1. Harel Z, Smyth B, Badve SV, et al. Anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial (SAFE-D). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025;36(5):901-910. PMID: 39495569
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov registry records, accessed 26 September 2026: NCT03987711 (SAFE-D); NCT02886962 (AVKDIAL); NCT03862859 (DANWARD); NCT07779746 (SAFE-D2); NCT05679024 (SACK); NCT06402851 (VISIONAIRE); NCT02942407 (RENAL-AF); NCT02039167 (WatchAFIB); NCT02885545 (STOP-HARM); NCT05204212 (LAA-KIDNEY). Registry records; no PubMed record.
  3. Pokorney SD, Chertow GM, Al-Khalidi HR, et al. Apixaban for patients with atrial fibrillation on hemodialysis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RENAL-AF). Circulation. 2022;146(23):1735-1745. PMID: 36335914
  4. Krummel T, Scheidt E, Borni-Duval C, et al. Haemodialysis in patients treated with oral anticoagulant: should we heparinize? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(4):906-13. PMID: 24459138
  5. Reinecke H, Engelbertz C, Bauersachs R, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing apixaban with the vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon in patients on chronic hemodialysis: the AXADIA-AFNET 8 study. Circulation. 2023;147(4):296-309. PMID: 36335915
  6. Hayashi M, Takamatsu I, Kanno Y, et al. A case-control study of calciphylaxis in Japanese end-stage renal disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(4):1580-4. PMID: 22121234
  7. Galloway PA, El-Damanawi R, Bardsley V, et al. Vitamin K antagonists predispose to calciphylaxis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephron. 2015;129(3):197-201. PMID: 25720849
  8. Brandenburg VM, Kramann R, Rothe H, et al. Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis): data from a large nationwide registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(1):126-132. PMID: 26908770
  9. Siontis KC, Zhang X, Eckard A, et al. Outcomes associated with apixaban use in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 2018;138(15):1519-1529. PMID: 29954737
  10. AlTurki A, Marafi M, Dawas A, et al. Meta-analysis evaluating apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. J Arrhythm. 2024;40(3):440-447. PMID: 38939758
  11. ELIQUIS (apixaban) tablets, prescribing information. E.R. Squibb & Sons / Bristol-Myers Squibb. DailyMed structured product label, set ID e9481622-7cc6-418a-acb6-c5450daae9b0 (version published May 2025), sections 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 7.1–7.3, 8.6, 12.3. Regulatory label; no PubMed record.
  12. Mavrakanas TA, Samer CF, Nessim SJ, et al. Apixaban pharmacokinetics at steady state in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(7):2241-2248. PMID: 28302754
  13. Cheng FWT, Xu W, Tang SCW, et al. Long-term benefits and safety of statins in patients with kidney failure: a target trial emulation study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025;36(5):882-889. PMID: 39480503
  14. Elkoumi O, Elkoumi A, Elbairy MK, et al. Impact of statins on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Cardiol. 2025;256:49-59. PMID: 40669550
  15. Chienwichai K, Mongkolrattanakul P, Chang A, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular outcomes associated with statin use in dialysis patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42700414
  16. Zimmerman D, Sood MM, Rigatto C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(10):3816-22. PMID: 23114904
  17. Wizemann V, Tong L, Satayathum S, et al. Atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients: clinical features and associations with anticoagulant therapy. Kidney Int. 2010;77(12):1098-106. PMID: 20054291
  18. Roy-Chaudhury P, Tumlin JA, Koplan BA, et al. Primary outcomes of the Monitoring in Dialysis Study indicate that clinically significant arrhythmias are common in hemodialysis patients and related to dialytic cycle. Kidney Int. 2018;93(4):941-951. PMID: 29395340
  19. Turakhia MP, Blankestijn PJ, Carrero JJ, et al. Chronic kidney disease and arrhythmias: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(24):2314-2325. PMID: 29522134
  20. Genovesi S, Camm AJ, Covic A, et al. Treatment strategies of the thromboembolic risk in kidney failure patients with atrial fibrillation (EuDial). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024;39(8):1248-1257. PMID: 38816212
  21. Olesen JB, Lip GY, Kamper AL, et al. Stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(7):625-35. PMID: 22894575
  22. Genovesi S, Vincenti A, Rossi E, et al. Atrial fibrillation and morbidity and mortality in a cohort of long-term hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(2):255-62. PMID: 18215703
  23. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1-e156. PMID: 38033089
  24. Coyle CR, Bash LD, Ramey DR, et al. Major bleeding rates in an international cohort of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Kidney Int Rep. 2024;9(9):2814-2818. PMID: 39291210
  25. Guedes M, Andrews C, Zhao J, et al. Multinational real-world practice patterns in the use of antithrombotic therapy among patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Med. 2026;8(3):101211. PMID: 41675209
  26. Langenhuijsen LFS, Derksen DCL, Milders J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive performance of stroke and bleeding prediction models in atrial fibrillation patients with kidney disease. Kidney Med. 2026;8(2):101200. PMID: 41630994
  27. Madken M, Mallick R, Rhodes E, et al. Development and validation of a predictive risk algorithm for bleeding in individuals on long-term hemodialysis: an international prospective cohort study (BLEED-HD). Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023;10:20543581231169610. PMID: 37377481
  28. De Vriese AS, Heine G. Anticoagulation management in haemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: evidence and opinion. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(11):2072-2079. PMID: 33647941
  29. Parker K, Power A, et al. Clinical practice guideline: anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in adults with advanced kidney disease. UK Kidney Association; final version September 2025, review date September 2028. Guideline document; no PubMed record.
  30. Winkelmayer WC, Hu A, Khairallah P, et al. Oral anticoagulant initiation in patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (2007-2020): an observational study of trends and disparities. Kidney Med. 2025;7(2):100926. PMID: 39844893
  31. Chan KE, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R, et al. Warfarin use associates with increased risk for stroke in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(10):2223-33. PMID: 19713308
  32. Shah M, Avgil Tsadok M, Jackevicius CA, et al. Warfarin use and the risk for stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing dialysis. Circulation. 2014;129(11):1196-203. PMID: 24452752
  33. Shen JI, Montez-Rath ME, Lenihan CR, et al. Outcomes after warfarin initiation in a cohort of hemodialysis patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(4):677-88. PMID: 26162653
  34. Kai B, Bogorad Y, Nguyen LN, et al. Warfarin use and the risk of mortality, stroke, and bleeding in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(5):645-651. PMID: 28185918
  35. Kim DG, Kim SH, Park SY, et al. Anticoagulation in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: a national population-based study. Clin Kidney J. 2024;17(2):sfae029. PMID: 38425706
  36. Park SJ, Kim YN, Oh BK, et al. Efficacy and safety of antithrombotics in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. J Nephrol. 2025;38(8):2229-2237. PMID: 40745057
  37. Mavrakanas TA, Garlo K, Charytan DM. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation in patients undergoing long-term dialysis with incident atrial fibrillation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(8):1146-1154. PMID: 32444398
  38. Winkelmayer WC, Erickson KF, Khairallah P, et al. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban initiation following newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2026;87(3):313-323. PMID: 41352721
  39. Randhawa MS, Vishwanath R, Rai MP, et al. Association between use of warfarin for atrial fibrillation and outcomes among patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e202175. PMID: 32250434
  40. Kuno T, Takagi H, Ando T, et al. Oral anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation on long-term hemodialysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(3):273-285. PMID: 31976865
  41. Kao TW, Chen ZW, Lin YH. Anticoagulation for patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(8):e034176. PMID: 38606775
  42. Du Y, Zeng Y, Xu S, et al. Oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation on long-term dialysis: a network meta-analysis of 137,574 patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2025;55(12):e70120. PMID: 40919820
  43. Hashimoto K, Fujisaki T, Aikawa T, et al. Optimal thromboembolism prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation on long-term dialysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025;48(7):733-753. PMID: 40468697
  44. Genovesi S, Kuno T, Floege J, et al. Oral anticoagulation and left atrial appendage closure in dialysis atrial fibrillation: between stroke prevention and bleeding hazard. Clin Kidney J. 2026;19(7):sfag217. PMID: 42436946
  45. Ballegaard ELF, Lindhard K, Lindhardt M, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing warfarin with no oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic dialysis: the Danish Warfarin-Dialysis (DANWARD) trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14(2):e081961. PMID: 38413147
  46. De Vriese AS, Caluwé R, Van Der Meersch H, et al. Safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists versus rivaroxaban in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(6):1474-1483. PMID: 33753537
  47. Chang TY, Chan YH, Chao TF, et al. Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation and kidney failure under hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials. J Arrhythm. 2025;41(3):e70094. PMID: 40390785
  48. Shaheen O, Hamdy M, Afifi IA, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42177744
  49. Wang X, Tirucherai G, Marbury TC, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(5):628-36. PMID: 26331581
  50. Xu Y, Chang AR, Inker LA, et al. Associations of apixaban dose with safety and effectiveness outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2023;148(19):1445-1454. PMID: 37681341
  51. Yang SH. Apixaban dose selection in kidney failure: reconciling pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42670022
  52. Chan KE, Edelman ER, Wenger JB, et al. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban use in atrial fibrillation patients on hemodialysis. Circulation. 2015;131(11):972-9. PMID: 25595139
  53. De Vriese AS, Caluwé R, Bailleul E, et al. Dose-finding study of rivaroxaban in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(1):91-8. PMID: 25804678
  54. Parasrampuria DA, Marbury T, Matsushima N, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of edoxaban in end-stage renal disease subjects undergoing haemodialysis. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113(4):719-27. PMID: 25566930
  55. Quinn LM, Richardson R, Cameron KJ, et al. Evaluating time in therapeutic range for hemodialysis patients taking warfarin. Clin Nephrol. 2015;83(2):80-5. PMID: 25500296
  56. Yang F, Hellyer JA, Than C, et al. Warfarin utilisation and anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Heart. 2017;103(11):818-826. PMID: 27852694
  57. De Vriese AS, Caluwé R, Pyfferoen L, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of vitamin K antagonist replacement by rivaroxaban with or without vitamin K2 in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: the Valkyrie study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(1):186-196. PMID: 31704740
  58. Kaisaier W, Xu Z, Guo L, et al. Left atrial appendage closure vs oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: long-term outcomes from 4 randomized trials. Heart Rhythm. 2025;22(11):e1086-e1096. PMID: 40754231
  59. Doshi SK, Kar S, Nair DG, et al. Left atrial appendage closure or anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (CHAMPION-AF). N Engl J Med. 2026;394(21):2083-2094. PMID: 41910347
  60. Genovesi S, Porcu L, Rebora P, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a multi-center, prospective, open label, observational study. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(12):2683-2692. PMID: 38046009
  61. Dhar G, Phadnis MA, Hunt SL, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion vs anticoagulants in dialysis with atrial fibrillation. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(9):e2530990. PMID: 40924421
  62. Gill GS, Shailly S, Chakrala T, et al. Adverse outcomes with left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in chronic and end stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025;75:56-63. PMID: 39191612
  63. Saraei R, Heine GH, Osmancik P, et al. Left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and end stage chronic KIDNEY disease: rationale and design of the prospective randomized LAA-KIDNEY trial. Am Heart J. 2026;300:107474. PMID: 42107551
  64. Genovesi S, Regolisti G, Ferraro PM, et al. Thromboembolic prophylaxis in kidney failure patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis: from risk stratification to decision making on anticoagulants or left atrial appendage closure. A position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42642036
  65. Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3314-3414. PMID: 39210723
  66. Damman K, Ter Maaten JM, Mayne KJ, et al. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, in collaboration with the European Renal Association (ERA). Eur Heart J. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42661426
  67. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164. PMID: 32778223
  68. Konecki C, Lipman ML, Mavrakanas TA, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of apixaban in end-stage kidney disease patients with atrial fibrillation receiving haemodialysis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025;64(2):307-321. PMID: 39853633
  69. Mavrakanas TA, Charytan DM. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation by P2Y12 inhibitor prescription status in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Kidney360. 2022;3(10):1769-1771. PMID: 36514740
  70. Cuker A, Burnett A, Triller D, et al. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(6):697-709. PMID: 30916798
  71. Cook WL, Tomlinson G, Donaldson M, et al. Falls and fall-related injuries in older dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(6):1197-204. PMID: 17699348
  72. Man-Son-Hing M, Nichol G, Lau A, et al. Choosing antithrombotic therapy for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for falls. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(7):677-85. PMID: 10218746
  73. Yang L, Li Z, Dai X, et al. Nontraumatic subdural hematoma in patients on hemodialysis with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1251652. PMID: 37789893
  74. Hu A, Liu S, Montez-Rath ME, et al. Associations of serum and dialysate potassium concentrations with incident atrial fibrillation in a cohort study of older US persons initiating hemodialysis for kidney failure. Kidney Int Rep. 2023;8(2):305-316. PMID: 36815107
  75. Charytan DM, Winkelmayer WC, Granger CB, et al. Effects of dialysate potassium concentration of 3.0 mmol/l with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on dialysis-free days versus dialysate potassium concentration of 2.0 mmol/l alone on rates of cardiac arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients with hyperkalemia (ADAPT). Kidney Int. 2025;107(1):169-179. PMID: 39490411
  76. Genovesi S, Rebora P, Gallieni M, et al. Effect of oral anticoagulant therapy on mortality in end-stage renal disease patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective study. J Nephrol. 2017;30(4):573-581. PMID: 27834042
  77. East C, Bass K, Mehta A, et al. Alirocumab and lipid levels, inflammatory biomarkers, metabolomics, and safety in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: the ALIrocumab in DIALysis Study. Kidney Med. 2022;4(7):100483. PMID: 35801187
  78. Baik M, Jeon J, Yoo J, et al. Effect of statins in patients with hemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(20):e043214. PMID: 41120813
  79. Kim JE, Park S, Kim MS, et al. Statin initiation and all-cause mortality in incident statin-naïve dialysis patients. Atherosclerosis. 2021;337:59-65. PMID: 34429195
  80. Damianaki A, Stambolliu E, Iliakis P, et al. Injectable lipid-lowering therapies in advanced chronic kidney disease: efficacy, safety and the dialysis paradox. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2026 (online ahead of print). PMID: 42603236
  81. Lee M, Choi WJ, Lee Y, et al. Association between statin therapy and mortality in patients on dialysis after atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):10940. PMID: 37414847
  82. Lo HY, Lin YS, Lin DS, et al. Association of statin therapy with major adverse cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with end-stage kidney disease and peripheral artery disease receiving maintenance dialysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2229706. PMID: 36048442
  83. Yen CL, Fan PC, Chen JJ, et al. The benefit of LDL-C levels below 55 mg/dL in ESKD patients under statin treatment: a target trial emulation study. Atherosclerosis. 2026;421:121883. PMID: 42685616

Also in this module