Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity

A Comprehensive Clinical Review: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, Pathology, Glomerular Disease, and Management

Clinical Mastery Series Urine Nephrology Now
Onconephrology Index ICI Diagnosis & Pathology HLH Review

Author: Andrew Bland, MD, MBA, MS

Executive Summary

Key Points
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) produce acute kidney injury in 2–5% of patients on monotherapy and up to 10% on combination anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 therapy; the dominant pathologic lesion in over 70% of biopsied cases is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), a T-cell–mediated immune-related adverse event (irAE) (1,2)
  • ICI-ATIN is mechanistically distinct from prerenal azotemia, classic ATN, and obstructive nephropathy; it develops weeks to months after ICI initiation, responds to corticosteroids, and does not represent direct tubulotoxicity (1,3)
  • The urinary signature of ICI-ATIN is sterile pyuria with white blood cell casts and subnephrotic proteinuria (<2 g/day); prominent hematuria with RBC casts or heavy proteinuria should redirect the diagnosis toward glomerular disease (1,4)
  • Kidney biopsy confirms ATIN in approximately 70–93% of biopsied cases and identifies concurrent glomerular disease (present in 27% of biopsied patients) that demands escalated immunosuppression (2,5)
  • Corticosteroids achieve complete or partial renal recovery in approximately 87% of treated patients; approximately 77% of patients who undergo ICI rechallenge after renal recovery do not experience recurrent AKI (2)
  • The ICI-associated glomerular disease spectrum includes MCD/podocytopathy (26%), pauci-immune crescentic GN (28%), lupus-like nephritis, membranous nephropathy, C3-GN, and IgA nephropathy — each requiring pattern-specific management (5)

1. Checkpoint Pathway Biology

1.1 The CTLA-4 Pathway

CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4) functions as an early-phase inhibitory checkpoint that is upregulated on the T cell surface within hours of T cell receptor activation. It competes with CD28 for binding to B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) on the antigen-presenting cell surface. Because CTLA-4 binds B7 ligands with approximately 20-fold higher affinity than CD28, its expression effectively outcompetes the costimulatory signal, dampening T cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine production. Ipilimumab, a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, blocks CTLA-4, removing this early inhibitory brake. The net result is broader T cell activation, greater clonal expansion, and a higher probability of autoreactive T cell engagement — which underlies the higher overall irAE rate seen with anti-CTLA-4 therapy compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy (1,6).

1.2 The PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway

PD-1 (programmed death-1) operates as a later-phase inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells, B cells, and NK cells. Its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, are expressed on tumor cells, antigen-presenting cells, and peripheral tissues including the kidney. When PD-1 engages PD-L1, SHP-2 phosphatase is recruited to the T cell receptor complex, dephosphorylating key signaling intermediates and attenuating T cell effector function, cytokine production, and survival signaling. This is the peripheral tolerance mechanism that protects normal tissues from ongoing immune attack (1,6).

Anti-PD-1 agents (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab) and anti-PD-L1 agents (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) block this interaction, reactivating T cells in the tumor microenvironment but also in peripheral tissues where PD-L1 is expressed — including renal tubular epithelium. Renal tubular cells constitutively express PD-L1, which protects them from immune-mediated injury under normal conditions. When PD-1/PD-L1 blockade removes this protection, tubular cells become vulnerable to T cell–mediated attack (1,3).

1.3 Combination Therapy

Combination therapy (anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1) produces the highest rates of immune-related adverse events across all organ systems, including the kidney. By simultaneously removing early-phase (CTLA-4) and late-phase (PD-1) immune checkpoints, combination therapy generates broader and more intense T cell activation, greater clonal diversity of autoreactive T cells, and a higher frequency and severity of off-target immune toxicity. The odds ratio for ICI-AKI with combination therapy versus monotherapy is approximately 3.2 (2).

2. ICI Nephrotoxicity Mechanisms

2.1 Loss of Renal Immune Tolerance

The kidney is normally protected from T cell–mediated injury by two principal mechanisms: PD-L1 expression on renal tubular epithelium engages PD-1 on infiltrating T cells to induce T cell exhaustion, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) suppress autoreactive T cell clones directed against renal antigens. ICI therapy disrupts both mechanisms: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade removes the tubular self-defense mechanism, and anti-CTLA-4 therapy reduces Treg number and function. The result is loss of peripheral tolerance to renal tubular antigens, enabling autoreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to infiltrate the interstitium and attack tubular epithelium (1,3).

2.2 Two Mechanistic Pathways to ICI-ATIN

Pathway 1 — Direct Autoimmune ATIN: ICIs reactivate pre-existing autoreactive T cell clones that recognize renal tubular cell surface antigens (possibly shared with tumor-associated antigens). These T cells were previously held in check by CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways. Upon checkpoint blockade, they mount a nephritogenic immune response against tubular epithelium.

Pathway 2 — Drug-Amplified ATIN: Concurrent medications such as proton pump inhibitors or NSAIDs serve as haptens that prime a drug-specific T cell response. Under normal checkpoint regulation, this response remains subclinical. ICI therapy amplifies it beyond the threshold of clinical disease, producing AIN that is attributable to the combination of the drug hapten and the checkpoint blockade rather than to either alone (1,2).

3. Epidemiology and Risk Factors

ICI-ATIN develops at a median of 14 weeks after ICI initiation, with a broad range extending from two days to 18 or more months (IQR 6–47 weeks) (2). The peak incidence occurs during weeks 8 through 20 in most series.

Risk Factors

Risk FactorOdds RatioClinical Significance
Combination ICI therapy (anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1)3.2Strongest risk factor; incidence ~10%
Concurrent PPI use2.1Modifiable; discontinue PPIs when possible
Pre-existing CKDReduced nephron mass amplifies functional impact
Age >60 yearsIncreased immune dysregulation substrate
Prior irAE in other organSuggests systemic predisposition
Melanoma / RCC tumor typeHigher rates than NSCLC

4. Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation of ICI-ATIN is most commonly asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, discovered incidentally on routine laboratory monitoring. The patient typically presents without urinary complaints and with only vague constitutional symptoms such as mild fatigue or reduced appetite. Urine output is typically preserved; oliguria is unusual and should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses (1,2).

Key Historical Features

5. Urinary Findings in ICI-ATIN

5.1 White Blood Cell Pyuria and WBC Casts

Sterile pyuria (>5 WBC/hpf in the absence of bacteriuria) is present in 60–80% of affected patients. WBC casts are the most specific urinary finding for ATIN — their presence confirms that the pyuria is of renal and specifically tubulointerstitial origin. Eosinophiluria (>1% on Hansel stain) is less reliably present in ICI-ATIN than in classic drug-induced AIN, reflecting the predominantly T-cell–driven rather than eosinophil-mediated immune response (1,3).

5.2 Proteinuria

Proteinuria is characteristically subnephrotic (<2 g/g creatinine). The Cortazar single-center series reported a median UPCR of 0.48 g/g (4). Proteinuria >2 g/day, and particularly >3.5 g/day (nephrotic range), should raise concern for concurrent glomerular disease.

5.3 Hematuria

Typically absent or minimal. Prominent hematuria (>10–15 RBCs/hpf), dysmorphic red cells, or RBC casts suggest glomerular pathology and should prompt urgent evaluation for crescentic GN, ANCA vasculitis, or anti-GBM disease (1,4).

5.4 Functional Tubular Markers

FENa is typically >2%, reflecting inappropriate sodium wasting from inflamed tubules. Urine osmolality <300 mOsm/kg is consistent with tubular concentrating defect. Elevated urine beta-2 microglobulin provides additional evidence of proximal tubular dysfunction (1).

Clinical Pearl: The urinalysis triad of sterile pyuria, WBC casts, and subnephrotic proteinuria in a patient 8–20 weeks into ICI therapy constitutes high-probability evidence of ATIN. The absence of RBC casts, dysmorphic red cells, or heavy proteinuria helps exclude glomerulonephritis as the primary lesion.

6. Clinical Recognition Framework: The ICI-ATIN Triad

Three convergent criteria, when simultaneously present, establish a high-probability diagnosis of ICI-ATIN (>90% likelihood) without biopsy:

CriterionDefinition
TemporalAcute creatinine elevation 6–20 weeks after ICI initiation, no alternative explanation within 24–48 hours
UrinarySterile pyuria ± WBC casts, subnephrotic proteinuria <2 g/day
FunctionalFENa >2% or urine osmolality <300–400 mOsm/kg (tubular dysfunction)
Atypical Features Requiring Biopsy:
  • Heavy proteinuria (>2 g/day)
  • Prominent RBC casts or dysmorphic erythrocytes
  • Onset <2 weeks or many months after ICI completion
  • No improvement after 2 weeks of appropriate steroid therapy
  • Clinical picture consistent with alternative diagnosis

7. Differential Diagnosis

Prerenal Azotemia

The most common cause of AKI in hospitalized patients. Volume depletion produces concentrated urine (Uosm >600) with low FENa (<1%). Should resolve with volume replacement within 24–48 hours; failure to improve strengthens the case for intrinsic renal pathology.

Acute Tubular Necrosis

From concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy, aminoglycosides, or iodinated contrast. Produces granular or pigmented waxy casts — not WBC casts — and presents within days of nephrotoxic exposure rather than weeks to months after ICI.

Obstructive Uropathy

From tumor progression, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, or ureteral involvement. Exclude with renal ultrasound in any patient with AKI and pelvic or retroperitoneal malignancy.

Pyelonephritis

May produce pyuria and WBC casts indistinguishable from ATIN; a positive urine culture (>100,000 CFU/mL) establishes this diagnosis. Sterile pyuria — pyuria without bacteriuria — strongly favors ATIN over infection.

ICI-Associated Glomerulonephritis

Suggested by heavy proteinuria (>2 g/day), prominent hematuria with dysmorphic red cells or RBC casts, or hypoalbuminemia. The Cortazar 2020 study identified concurrent glomerular pathology in 27% of biopsied patients (2).

8. Kidney Biopsy: Indications and Findings

8.1 The Biopsy Decision

The Cortazar/MD Anderson approach advocates for early biopsy in all stage 2 or higher AKI, performed before high-dose steroid initiation. The Brigham approach recommends proceeding empirically with corticosteroids in classic ATIN presentations, reserving biopsy for atypical features, severe AKI, lack of steroid response, or prominent glomerular features (1,2,6).

8.2 Light Microscopy in ICI-ATIN

The dominant finding is a dense inflammatory infiltrate within the renal interstitium, composed predominantly of mononuclear cells — lymphocytes predominate, with plasma cells, macrophages, and monocytes in variable numbers. Tubulitis (lymphocyte infiltration through the tubular basement membrane into the tubular epithelium) reflects active cytotoxic T cell attack. Eosinophils tend to be sparse compared to classic drug-induced AIN. Glomeruli appear normal or near-normal — an important negative finding (1,3).

Histologic Severity Grading

SeverityInterstitial InvolvementPrognosis
Mild<10%, preserved tubular architectureExcellent recovery
Moderate10–50% with focal tubular necrosisGood recovery expected
Severe>50% with extensive tubular necrosis and early fibrosisReduced likelihood of complete recovery

8.3 Immunofluorescence

Characteristically sparse or negative. No linear or granular immune complex deposits along tubular or glomerular basement membranes. This paucity of immune complex deposition is consistent with T-cell–mediated rather than antibody-mediated pathogenesis. In concurrent glomerular disease, IF will be positive and reflect the specific pattern (1,3,5).

8.4 Electron Microscopy

In pure ICI-ATIN, no electron-dense immune complex deposits are identified. When concurrent glomerular disease is present, EM becomes essential: foot process effacement confirms podocytopathy (MCD/FSGS); subepithelial deposits confirm membranous; subendothelial deposits indicate immune-complex GN; endothelial swelling with platelet-fibrin thrombi characterizes TMA.

Clinical Pearl — Biopsy in Three Lines: Light microscopy shows dense T-cell interstitial infiltration with tubulitis but normal glomeruli. Immunofluorescence is negative for immune deposits. Electron microscopy confirms no glomerular deposits, establishing T-cell–mediated (not antibody-mediated) pathogenesis.

9. Pathologic Spectrum: Beyond Pure ATIN

The Cortazar 2020 multicenter study (138 ICI-AKI patients, 93 biopsied) established the pathologic distribution (2):

Treatment Intensity by Biopsy Findings

Pathologic PatternFrequencyFirst-LineEscalation
Pure ATIN71%Prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/dayAdd MMF if refractory
ATIN + glomerular19%Prednisone 1 mg/kg/dayRituximab or MMF
Pure glomerular4%Prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/dayRituximab or cyclophosphamide
TMA<2%High-dose steroidsPlasma exchange (center-dependent)

The Kitchlu 2021 systematic review of 112 ICI-associated glomerular disease patients identified: pauci-immune crescentic GN (28.3%), podocytopathies including MCD and FSGS (26.4%), immune-complex GN including lupus-like and membranous (18.9%), MPGN including C3-GN (9.8%), ANCA-positive vasculitis (8.0%), and other patterns including IgA nephropathy (8.6%) (5).

10. ICI-Associated Glomerular Diseases

10.1 Minimal Change Disease / Podocytopathy

Presents with sudden-onset nephrotic syndrome (>3.5 g/day proteinuria, edema, hypoalbuminemia), typically 2–8 weeks after ICI initiation, often with preserved serum creatinine. EM is diagnostic: widespread podocyte foot process effacement. IF is negative or shows only trace IgM. Mechanism involves ICI-restored T cells producing lymphokines (IL-4, IL-13) that disrupt podocyte cytoskeletal architecture through STAT6 activation. Management: ICI hold, prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day, with 80–90% achieving complete remission within 4–12 weeks. Steroid-sparing options: MMF, tacrolimus, or rituximab for relapsing cases (5).

10.2 Lupus-Like Nephritis

Presents with proteinuria plus hematuria with dysmorphic RBCs and RBC casts, variable AKI, and — critically — negative or only low-titer ANA with absent anti-dsDNA and normal complement. Biopsy: Class III or IV pattern with full-house IF (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) and subendothelial electron-dense deposits. Permanent ICI discontinuation recommended. Class IV disease requires prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day plus MMF or cyclophosphamide induction. Renal remission in 50–70%; ESRD in 10–20% (5).

10.3 Pauci-Immune Crescentic GN

The most common GN pattern in ICI-associated kidney injury. Presents as rapidly progressive AKI with heavy proteinuria and prominent dysmorphic hematuria with RBC casts. ANCA-negative, ANA-negative, anti-GBM-negative. Biopsy: necrotizing segmental capillary loop injury with crescent formation, pauci-immune IF. This is a nephrology emergency. Treatment parallels primary ANCA vasculitis: prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day plus rituximab (375 mg/m² IV weekly x4, preferred) or cyclophosphamide. Plasma exchange when Cr >5 mg/dL. Renal recovery in 40–50%; ESRD in 15–25% (5,8).

10.4 Membranous Nephropathy

Presents with nephrotic syndrome (often >8–10 g/day proteinuria), preserved creatinine, and negative PLA2R antibody — the key distinguishing feature from primary membranous. Biopsy: thickened GBM with subepithelial deposits, granular IgG + C3 on IF. Rituximab is preferred treatment. Maximal-dose ACE-I/ARB essential. Anticoagulation when albumin <2.5 g/dL. ICI rechallenge generally not recommended (5).

10.5 C3 Glomerulonephritis

C3-dominant IF (C3 ≥2+ with immunoglobulin absent or <1+), suggesting alternative complement pathway dysregulation. Presentation: hematuria, non-nephrotic proteinuria, variable AKI, normal C3/C4. Management: ACE-I/ARB for mild disease; prednisone for progressive disease; eculizumab for steroid-refractory cases (5).

Glomerular Disease Summary

PatternKey PresentationBiopsy HallmarkSerologyFirst-Line TxPrognosis
MCD/PodocytopathyNephrotic, normal CrFoot process effacement (EM)NegativePrednisone 0.5–1 mg/kgExcellent (80–90% CR)
Lupus-likeHematuria + nephroticClass III/IV, full-house IFANA−, C3/C4 nlPrednisone + MMF/cycloGood (50–70% remission)
Pauci-immune crescentRPGN, RBC castsCrescents, pauci-immune IFANCA−, ANA−Prednisone + rituximabGuarded (40–50% CR)
MembranousNephrotic, normal CrSubepithelial deposits (EM)PLA2R−Rituximab + ACE-IModerate (50–70% PR)
C3-GNHematuria, mild AKIC3-dominant IFC3/C4 nlPrednisone ± eculizumabModerate (50–60%)
IgA NephropathyHematuria, mild AKIIgA-dominant IFNormalPrednisone ± MMFModerate (varies)

11. The PPI Confounder

PPIs are well-established causes of AIN that produce a histologic pattern indistinguishable from ICI-related ATIN: both conditions show dense lymphocytic interstitial infiltration, tubular injury, sterile pyuria, and subnephrotic proteinuria (1,7).

Clinical Pearl — Diagnostic Approach:
  • AKI onset at 6–20 weeks after ICI initiation with stable long-term PPI → favors ICI causation
  • PPI recently introduced and AKI onset aligns with PPI initiation → favors PPI-AIN
  • Always discontinue PPI immediately upon recognition of AKI
  • Eosinophiluria (>5% on Hansel stain) is more prominent in PPI-AIN than ICI-ATIN
  • Creatinine improves within 2 weeks of PPI cessation alone → PPI-AIN favored
  • AKI persists despite PPI discontinuation → ICI-ATIN favored, initiate steroids

12. Landmark Reference: Cortazar 2020 Multicenter Study

The essential epidemiologic and outcomes foundation for current understanding of ICI-AKI (2). This study enrolled 138 patients with ICI-AKI across 12 U.S. academic medical centers, with 276 ICI-treated controls.

ParameterFinding
Median time ICI → AKI14 weeks (IQR 6–47)
Combination ICI therapy OR3.2 (p<0.001)
PPI use OR2.1 (p=0.02)
Pure ATIN on biopsy71%
ATIN + glomerular disease19%
Steroid response (complete + partial)87% (44% complete, 43% partial)
Median time to Cr plateau after steroids14 days
Median time to Cr ≤1.2x baseline28 days
Rechallenge success rate77% (23/30) without recurrent AKI
Critical Finding: Failure to achieve complete renal recovery from ICI-ATIN was independently associated with higher overall mortality, even after adjusting for tumor type and performance status — underscoring that kidney recovery has prognostic significance beyond the kidney itself.

13. Management: Grade-Based Algorithm

13.1 CTCAE v5.0 Grading with KDIGO Integration

CTCAE GradeCreatinine ChangeKDIGO StageICI Management
Grade 11.5–1.9x baselineStage 1Continue ICI with monitoring
Grade 22.0–2.9x baselineStage 2Hold ICI, initiate steroids
Grade 3≥3x baseline or >3 mg/dLStage 3Hold ICI, high-dose steroids
Grade 4Dialysis-dependentStage 3 (dialysis)Permanent ICI discontinuation
Warning: ASCO and NCCN differ on Grade 3–4 rechallenge: ASCO recommends permanent discontinuation after Grade 3–4 irAE, while NCCN permits rechallenge with monitoring. Most major academic centers follow NCCN’s more nuanced approach (3,9).

13.2 Grade 1 Management

Weekly labs for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks if stable. Discontinue all PPIs and NSAIDs. Hold diuretics unless essential. 60–70% remain stable; 20–30% progress to Grade 2.

13.3 Grade 2 Management

Immediate ICI hold and prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day PO. IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily x3 days for severe or rapidly progressive presentations. Steroid taper: full dose for 10–14 days, then reduce ~20 mg every 5–7 days. Minimum total taper: 4–6 weeks. Rapid tapers increase relapse rates from ~10% to 30–40%.

13.4 Grade 3 Management

Renal emergency. IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily x3 days, then prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day. Mandatory nephrology consultation. Kidney biopsy strongly recommended. Dialysis initiation for K >6.0 mEq/L refractory to medical management, pH <7.2, volume overload with hypoxia, or uremic symptoms. ~50–60% of Grade 3–4 patients who require dialysis recover renal function within 4–6 weeks.

13.5 Grade 4 Management

Permanent ICI discontinuation. IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily x5 days plus steroid-sparing agent. Kidney biopsy mandatory. ~50% recover off dialysis; ~30% progress to ESRD; ~20% expire from cancer or other complications (3).

14. Steroid-Refractory ICI-ATIN

Defined as absence of creatinine improvement or worsening despite 3–5 days of high-dose corticosteroids.

Steroid-Sparing Agents

AgentDoseMechanismResponse RateKey Considerations
MMF500 mg q6h PO (2–3 g/day)IMPDH inhibition~70%GI intolerance (20–30%), neutropenia
Rituximab375 mg/m² IV weekly x4CD20+ B-cell depletion~80%HBV screening mandatory; cost
Infliximab5 mg/kg IV wks 0, 2, 6TNF-α blockade~60–70%Do NOT use with PD-L1 inhibitors; TB screening
Cyclophosphamide500–750 mg/m² IV monthlyAlkylating agent~85%Reserved for crescentic GN; hemorrhagic cystitis risk

Escalation Sequence

  1. Day 3–5 of high-dose steroids without improvement → add MMF 500 mg q6h
  2. Week 1–2 without improvement → add rituximab 375 mg/m² weekly x4
  3. Week 3–4 if crescentic GN with >30% fibrosis → transition to cyclophosphamide
Clinical Pearl: The optimal window for steroid-sparing addition is day 3–5 of high-dose steroids. Adding too early prevents identifying true steroid responders; waiting beyond 7–10 days delays necessary immune control in non-responders.

15. ICI Rechallenge

15.1 Patient Selection

Rechallenge is appropriate when: Grade 1–2 initial AKI, complete or near-complete recovery (Cr ≤1.2x baseline), pure ATIN on biopsy (if performed), minimum 2-month interval, no steroid-refractory history, and meaningful cancer control benefit expected (2).

Rechallenge NOT Appropriate: Grade 3–4 AKI, dialysis-dependent AKI, crescentic GN or severe glomerular pattern, steroid-refractory disease, recurrent AKI within 2 months. For lupus-like nephritis, membranous, or crescentic GN — rechallenge generally contraindicated.

15.2 Rechallenge Strategies

StrategyApproachSuccess Rate
Same ICI at full doseMost common; weekly labs x4 wks, then q2wk x8 wks77%
Switch to alternative ICIe.g., nivolumab → pembrolizumab, or PD-1 → PD-L1~50–60%
Extended dosing intervale.g., nivolumab Q2W → Q4WLimited data

Pre-Rechallenge Protocol

16. Special Populations

16.1 ICI in Kidney Transplant Recipients

ICIs restore immune recognition of allograft antigens, producing a 10–20-fold increase in rejection risk. When AKI develops, the differential must include acute rejection (T-cell mediated, antibody-mediated, or both), ICI-ATIN in the allograft, and the combination. Biopsy is mandatory. Rechallenge is generally not recommended unless the malignancy is extremely aggressive and the graft is considered expendable (9).

16.2 ICI in ESRD/Dialysis Patients

Most ICI agents are cleared via the mononuclear phagocyte system rather than renal excretion. ICI-AKI does not manifest as creatinine rise in anuric patients. Standard steroid protocols apply (3).

16.3 ICI in Advanced CKD (Stage 3b–4)

Reduced nephron mass leaves less buffering capacity against interstitial inflammation. KDIGO staging is more informative than CTCAE grading in this population. Biweekly laboratory monitoring at minimum. ICI rechallenge after AKI in patients with eGFR <30 is generally not recommended (3).

17. Long-Term Renal Outcomes

Approximately 30–40% of patients develop progressive CKD over 6–12 months following ICI-AKI. 10–15% progress to ESRD within 2 years. Predictors of CKD progression: older age, baseline CKD, multi-agent immunosuppression, crescentic GN at biopsy, and incomplete Cr recovery at 3 months (2,3).

Post-ICI-AKI Surveillance

18. Summary

ICI-associated kidney injury is, in its dominant form, acute tubulointerstitial nephritis — a T-cell–mediated, steroid-responsive immune-related adverse event pathologically distinct from prerenal azotemia, classic ATN, and obstructive nephropathy. Its recognition requires systematic laboratory surveillance, attention to the urinary signature of sterile pyuria and WBC casts, and awareness of the 8–20 week timeline.

Biopsy confirms ATIN in the majority and identifies the 27% with concurrent glomerular disease requiring escalated immunosuppression. The management approach recognizes that ICI-AKI is not a permanent contraindication to cancer therapy: grade-based steroid protocols achieve recovery in the vast majority, and carefully selected rechallenge succeeds in approximately 77% of cases.

The nephrologist’s role — identifying the diagnosis early, interpreting the biopsy, titrating immunosuppression, and advising on rechallenge eligibility — is central to an oncologic care model that simultaneously preserves renal function and maintains access to life-prolonging cancer therapy.

References

  1. Herrmann SM, Perazella MA. Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2025;107(1):21-32. DOI | PubMed
  2. Cortazar FB, Kibbelaar ZA, Glezerman IG, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI: a multicenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(2):435-446. DOI | PubMed
  3. Gupta S, Cortazar FB, Riella LV, Leaf DE. Immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity: Update 2020. Kidney360. 2020;1(2):130-140. DOI | PubMed
  4. Cortazar FB, Marrone KA, Troxell ML, et al. Clinicopathological features of acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Kidney Int. 2016;90(3):638-647. DOI | PubMed
  5. Kitchlu A, Jhaveri KD, Wadhwani S, et al. A systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated glomerular disease. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(1):66-77. DOI | PubMed
  6. Perazella MA, Shirali AC. Immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity: what do we know and what should we do? Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):62-74. DOI | PubMed
  7. Shirali AC, Perazella MA, Gettinger S. Association of acute interstitial nephritis with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor therapy in lung cancer patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(2):287-291. DOI | PubMed
  8. Wanchoo R, Karam S, Uppal NN, et al. Adverse renal effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a narrative review. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(2):160-169. DOI | PubMed
  9. Weber JS, Carlino MS, Khattak A, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(36):4073-4099. DOI | PubMed

Andrew Bland, MD, MBA, MS | Clinical Mastery Series | Urine Nephrology Now

© 2026. For educational use only.