๐Ÿงฌ

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus & Lupus Nephritis

Comprehensive Guide to SLE Diagnosis, Classification, and Management

๐Ÿ“Š 2019 EULAR/ACR Criteria ๐Ÿ”ฌ ISN/RPS Classification ๐Ÿ’Š Evidence-Based Treatment ๐ŸŽ† Emerging Therapies 2025 ๐Ÿ‘ฉ Special Populations

๐Ÿ“š Overview of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multi-system autoimmune disease characterized by loss of tolerance to nuclear antigens, leading to immune complex formation and tissue damage. Lupus nephritis occurs in 50-70% of SLE patients and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.

โš ๏ธ Clinical Significance

  • Prevalence: 20-150 per 100,000, with higher rates in women (9:1 ratio) and certain ethnicities
  • Kidney involvement: 50-70% of SLE patients develop lupus nephritis
  • Prognosis: 10-year survival >95% with appropriate treatment
  • ESRD risk: 10-15% progress to end-stage renal disease without proper management

SLE Pathophysiology: From Genes to Disease

๐Ÿงฌ Molecular Pathogenesis

1. Genetic Predisposition

HLA associations, complement deficiencies, immune regulation gene variants

2. Environmental Triggers

UV exposure, infections (EBV), drugs, stress

3. Loss of Tolerance

Defective apoptosis, increased cell death, autoantigen exposure

4. Autoantibody Production

Anti-dsDNA, Anti-Sm, Antiphospholipid, Anti-C1q

5. Immune Complex Formation

In situ and circulating immune complexes

6. Tissue Damage

Complement activation, inflammation, organ damage

๐Ÿ”ฌ Key Pathophysiologic Concepts

Type II & III Hypersensitivity

  • Antibody-mediated tissue damage
  • Immune complex deposition
  • Complement activation
  • Inflammatory cascade

Interferon-ฮฑ Pathway

  • Plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation
  • Interferon signature in SLE
  • Tubuloreticular inclusions in kidneys
  • Target for new therapies

Molecular Mimicry

  • Anti-dsDNA cross-reactivity
  • ฮฑ-actinin in glomerular basement membrane
  • Direct kidney targeting
  • Nephritogenic potential

2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria

๐Ÿ“‹ Criteria Overview

The 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria represent a significant improvement over previous classification systems, with enhanced specificity and clinical relevance. The weighted scoring system better reflects the relative importance of different clinical and laboratory features.

Entry Criterion

ANA โ‰ฅ 1:80 on HEp-2 cells (required for classification)

Classification Threshold

โ‰ฅ10 points for SLE classification

Weighted Scoring

Points range from 2-10 based on specificity

๐Ÿงฎ Interactive SLE Criteria Calculator

Click on criteria present in your patient to calculate the SLE classification score:

Constitutional Domain

Fever 2 points

Hematologic Domain

Leukopenia (<4,000/mmยณ) 3 points
Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mmยณ) 4 points
Autoimmune hemolysis 4 points

Neuropsychiatric Domain

Delirium 2 points
Psychosis 3 points
Seizure 5 points

Mucocutaneous Domain

Non-scarring alopecia 2 points
Oral ulcers 2 points
Subacute cutaneous OR discoid lupus 4 points
Acute cutaneous lupus (malar rash) 6 points

Musculoskeletal Domain

Joint involvement 6 points

Renal Domain

Proteinuria >0.5g/24h 4 points
Renal biopsy Class II or V lupus nephritis 8 points
Renal biopsy Class III or IV lupus nephritis 10 points

Serosal Domain

Pleural or pericardial effusion 5 points
Acute pericarditis 6 points

Immunologic Domain

Low C3 OR low C4 3 points
Low C3 AND low C4 4 points
Anti-phospholipid antibodies 2 points
Anti-dsDNA OR Anti-Sm antibodies 6 points
Total Score: 0 points
ANA โ‰ฅ1:80 required for entry. โ‰ฅ10 points needed for SLE classification.

๐Ÿงฌ SLE Autoantibody Profiles & Clinical Correlations

Autoantibody Frequency in SLE Clinical Associations Disease Activity Correlation Clinical Utility
ANA 95-98% Screening test, multiple patterns No correlation Entry criterion, excludes SLE if negative
Anti-dsDNA 60-70% Lupus nephritis, more severe disease Strong correlation Disease monitoring, nephritis prediction
Anti-Sm 20-25% SLE-specific, less nephritis No correlation Diagnosis confirmation, high specificity
Anti-SSA/Ro52 30-40% Neonatal lupus, CHB, photosensitivity Mild correlation Pregnancy counseling essential
Anti-SSA/Ro60 25-35% Sicca symptoms, subacute cutaneous lupus No correlation Secondary Sjรถgren's overlap
Anti-SSB/La 15-20% Neonatal lupus, less nephritis No correlation Often with anti-SSA/Ro
Anti-RNP 30-40% MCTD overlap, less nephritis No correlation Mixed connective tissue disease
Anti-C1q 30-40% Active nephritis, more severe disease Strong correlation Nephritis activity monitoring
Antiphospholipid 30-50% Thrombosis, pregnancy complications No correlation Anticoagulation decisions
Anti-ribosomal P 10-20% Neuropsychiatric lupus, psychosis Activity correlation CNS lupus evaluation

๐ŸŽฏ Clinical Pearls for Autoantibody Interpretation

  • Anti-dsDNA monitoring: Rising levels often precede clinical flares by 4-8 weeks
  • Complement consumption: Low C3 AND C4 indicates classical pathway activation (SLE pattern)
  • Anti-C1q utility: More specific for active nephritis than anti-dsDNA alone
  • Pregnancy screening: Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La essential before conception
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome: Requires clinical events plus persistent antibodies

ISN/RPS Lupus Nephritis Classification

๐Ÿ”ฌ Classification Overview

The International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 classification system provides standardized terminology for lupus nephritis, enabling consistent treatment decisions and prognosis assessment.

Class I: Minimal Mesangial

Frequency: 5-10%

Findings: Normal light microscopy, minimal mesangial deposits on EM

Clinical: Normal kidney function, minimal proteinuria

Treatment: No specific therapy needed

Prognosis: Excellent

Class II: Mesangial Proliferative

Frequency: 10-20%

Findings: Mesangial hypercellularity, mesangial deposits

Clinical: Mild proteinuria, occasional hematuria

Treatment: Supportive care, monitor for progression

Prognosis: Good, may progress to higher classes

Class III: Focal Proliferative

Frequency: 15-25%

Findings: <50% glomeruli involved, endocapillary proliferation

Clinical: Nephritic syndrome, variable kidney function

Treatment: Immunosuppression based on activity

Prognosis: Variable, depends on activity and chronicity

Class IV: Diffuse Proliferative

Frequency: 40-50%

Findings: โ‰ฅ50% glomeruli involved, +/- crescents

Clinical: Most severe, mixed nephritic-nephrotic

Treatment: Aggressive immunosuppression required

Prognosis: Guarded without treatment, good with therapy

Subclassification:

  • IV-S (Segmental): <50% of capillary tuft involved
  • IV-G (Global): โ‰ฅ50% of capillary tuft involved

Class V: Membranous

Frequency: 15-20%

Findings: Subepithelial deposits, "spike and dome" appearance

Clinical: Nephrotic syndrome, normal kidney function initially

Treatment: Immunosuppression for high-risk disease

Prognosis: Good short-term, risk of progression

Class VI: Advanced Sclerosing

Frequency: 5-10%

Findings: >90% glomerulosclerosis

Clinical: Advanced CKD, irreversible damage

Treatment: CKD management, transplant preparation

Prognosis: Poor for kidney recovery

๐ŸŽฏ Activity and Chronicity Scoring

Activity Index (0-24)

  • Endocapillary proliferation (ร—1)
  • Neutrophil infiltration (ร—1)
  • Subendothelial hyaline deposits (ร—1)
  • Fibrinoid necrosis (ร—2)
  • Cellular crescents (ร—2)
  • Interstitial inflammation (ร—1)

Chronicity Index (0-12)

  • Glomerular sclerosis (ร—1)
  • Fibrous crescents (ร—1)
  • Tubular atrophy (ร—1)
  • Interstitial fibrosis (ร—1)

Clinical Relevance: Activity index โ‰ฅ12 or chronicity index โ‰ฅ4 indicates worse prognosis and may require more aggressive treatment.

Evidence-Based Lupus Nephritis Treatment

๐ŸŽฏ Treatment Philosophy

Modern lupus nephritis treatment follows a two-phase approach: induction therapy to achieve remission and maintenance therapy to prevent relapse while minimizing toxicity. Treatment selection is individualized based on nephritis class, patient factors, and regional preferences.

Phase 1: Induction Therapy (0-6 months)

Goal: Achieve complete or partial remission

Duration: Maximum 6 months

Indications: Class III, IV, or V lupus nephritis

๐Ÿšจ Emergency Measures (Severe Class IV)

  • IV Methylprednisolone: 0.5-1g daily ร— 3 days
  • Plasmapheresis: Consider if crescents >50% or anti-GBM positive
  • Dialysis support: If uremic or volume overloaded

๐Ÿฅ‡ Mycophenolate Mofetil (Preferred)

Dose: 2-3g daily in divided doses

Advantages:

  • Equivalent efficacy to cyclophosphamide
  • Better fertility preservation
  • Lower infection risk
  • No hemorrhagic cystitis risk

Monitoring: CBC weekly ร— 4, then monthly

Evidence: ALMS trial showed non-inferiority

Cyclophosphamide (Alternative)

Dose: 0.5-1g/mยฒ monthly ร— 6 doses OR 1.5-2mg/kg daily

Advantages:

  • Rapid onset of action
  • Effective for severe disease
  • Long track record of efficacy

Disadvantages:

  • Fertility toxicity (major concern)
  • Hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Secondary malignancy risk
  • Higher infection rates

Monitoring: CBC weekly, urinalysis monthly

๐ŸŒŸ Voclosporin (Lupkynis) - FDA Approved 2021

Dose: 23.7mg twice daily with food + MMF 1g BID

Revolutionary Advantages:

  • Superior efficacy: AURORA trial: 40.8% complete response vs 22.5% MMF alone
  • First approved CNI: Specifically for lupus nephritis
  • Steroid-sparing: Allows faster corticosteroid tapering
  • Consistent levels: Improved pharmacokinetics vs traditional CNIs

Monitoring: Trough levels (target 10-15 ng/mL), eGFR, BP, electrolytes

Evidence: First positive CNI trial in lupus nephritis

Traditional Calcineurin Inhibitors

Options: Tacrolimus 0.1mg/kg/day or Cyclosporine 4-5mg/kg/day

Indications:

  • Class V (membranous) lupus nephritis
  • MMF intolerance
  • Alternative when voclosporin unavailable

Limitations: Less evidence in lupus nephritis vs voclosporin

Monitoring: Drug levels, kidney function, blood pressure

๐Ÿ’Š Corticosteroid Protocol

  • Initial: Prednisone 0.5-1mg/kg/day (max 60-80mg)
  • Duration: 4-6 weeks at full dose
  • Tapering: Reduce by 25% every 2-4 weeks to 10-15mg/day
  • Goal: โ‰ค7.5mg/day by 6 months

Phase 2: Maintenance Therapy (6+ months)

Goal: Prevent relapse, minimize drug toxicity

Duration: Minimum 3 years, often longer

Entry criteria: Achievement of partial or complete remission

๐Ÿฅ‡ Mycophenolate Mofetil (First-Line)

Dose: 1-2g daily

Advantages:

  • Superior to azathioprine in some studies
  • Lower relapse rates
  • Better long-term kidney survival

Evidence: MAINTAIN nephritis trial

Azathioprine (Alternative)

Dose: 1.5-2.5mg/kg daily

Advantages:

  • Pregnancy-compatible
  • Long-term safety data
  • Cost-effective

Considerations:

  • Check TPMT enzyme activity
  • Higher relapse rates vs MMF

Calcineurin Inhibitors

Role: Alternative maintenance option

Indications:

  • MMF/AZA intolerance
  • Combination protocols
  • Class V nephritis

Limitations: Nephrotoxicity, hypertension

๐Ÿ“Š Response Assessment Criteria

Complete Remission
  • Proteinuria <0.5g/24h
  • Normal/stable kidney function
  • Inactive urinary sediment
Partial Remission
  • โ‰ฅ50% reduction in proteinuria
  • Proteinuria <3g/24h
  • Stable kidney function
Treatment Failure
  • No improvement at 6 months
  • Worsening kidney function
  • Need for rescue therapy

Adjunctive Therapies

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Hydroxychloroquine

Dose: 200-400mg daily

Benefits:

  • Reduced flare rates
  • Cardiovascular protection
  • Antithrombotic effects
  • Improved survival

Monitoring: Annual ophthalmologic exams

๐Ÿซ€ ACE Inhibitors/ARBs

Indications: Proteinuria >0.5g/24h

Benefits:

  • Nephroprotection
  • Reduced proteinuria
  • Blood pressure control
  • Cardiovascular protection

Goal: BP <130/80 mmHg

๐Ÿฆด Bone Health

Calcium: 1200mg daily

Vitamin D: 1000-2000 IU daily

Bisphosphonates: Consider if:

  • Postmenopausal
  • Long-term steroids
  • T-score โ‰ค-2.5

๐Ÿ’‰ Vaccinations

Before immunosuppression:

  • Live vaccines if possible
  • Pneumococcal (PCV13 + PPSV23)
  • Influenza (annual)
  • COVID-19 (up to date)

Avoid: Live vaccines during immunosuppression

Special Populations: Young Women with SLE

๐Ÿ‘ฉ Unique Considerations for Young Women

Young women with SLE face unique challenges including fertility preservation, pregnancy planning, contraception selection, and long-term bone health. Comprehensive care requires addressing these issues proactively.

๐Ÿคฐ Pregnancy and Lupus Nephritis

Pre-Conception Counseling (Essential)

Optimal Timing
  • SLE quiescent โ‰ฅ6 months
  • Complete/partial remission
  • Prednisone โ‰ค10mg daily
  • Stable kidney function
Medication Adjustments
  • Switch MMF to AZA 3 months before conception
  • Continue hydroxychloroquine
  • Optimize steroid dose
  • Ensure pregnancy-safe HTN meds
Essential Testing
  • Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La
  • Antiphospholipid antibodies
  • Complement levels
  • Baseline kidney function

๐Ÿ“‹ Pregnancy-Safe Medications

โœ… SAFE in Pregnancy

  • Azathioprine: First-line maintenance
  • Hydroxychloroquine: Continue throughout
  • Prednisone: Safe but minimize dose
  • Cyclosporine: Alternative option
  • Tacrolimus: Limited data but acceptable

โŒ AVOID in Pregnancy

  • Mycophenolate: Teratogenic
  • Cyclophosphamide: Teratogenic
  • Methotrexate: Teratogenic
  • ACE inhibitors: Fetotoxic
  • ARBs: Fetotoxic

๐Ÿ”„ Lupus Nephritis Flare vs. Preeclampsia

Feature Lupus Nephritis Flare Preeclampsia Both Can Coexist
Timing Any gestational age Usually >20 weeks Overlap possible
Anti-dsDNA Rising levels Stable or declining May be confusing
Complement Low C3, C4 Normal or high Key differentiator
Uric acid Normal or slightly elevated Markedly elevated Helpful distinction
RBC casts Present Absent Pathognomonic for GN
Platelets Variable Often low Not discriminatory

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Contraception in SLE

โœ… Preferred Options

  • Progestin-only pills: No thrombosis risk
  • Levonorgestrel IUD: Highly effective
  • Copper IUD: Hormone-free option
  • Barrier methods: Condoms, diaphragm
  • Depot medroxyprogesterone: Consider bone health

โš ๏ธ Use with Caution

  • Combined oral contraceptives: Avoid if antiphospholipid antibodies positive
  • Estrogen-containing methods: Increased thrombosis risk
  • Consideration: May be acceptable in stable disease without aPL antibodies

๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ Fertility Preservation

High-Risk Factors

  • Cyclophosphamide exposure
  • Age >35 years
  • Prior fertility issues
  • Family history of early menopause

Preservation Options

  • Oocyte cryopreservation: Before treatment
  • Embryo cryopreservation: If partner available
  • GnRH agonists: During cyclophosphamide (limited evidence)
  • Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Experimental

Counseling Points

  • Discuss early in treatment planning
  • Fertility consultation before cyclophosphamide
  • Alternative treatments to preserve fertility
  • Regular AMH monitoring

๐Ÿ“Š Disease Activity Monitoring & Long-term Management

๐ŸŽฏ Monitoring Strategy

Effective lupus nephritis management requires systematic monitoring of disease activity, treatment response, and medication toxicity. Early detection of flares allows for prompt intervention and better outcomes.

๐Ÿ“… Monitoring Schedule

Induction phase: Monthly visits

Maintenance phase: Every 3-6 months

Stable remission: Every 6-12 months

๐Ÿงช Laboratory Tests

Routine: CBC, CMP, UA, UPC ratio

Activity markers: Anti-dsDNA, C3, C4

If active: Anti-C1q, CH50

๐Ÿ’Š Drug Monitoring

MMF: CBC, GI tolerance

CNI: Drug levels, kidney function

HCQ: Annual eye exams

๐ŸŽฏ Treatment Goals

Proteinuria: <0.5g/24h (complete remission)

Kidney function: Stable or improving eGFR

Serology: Normalizing complement, declining anti-dsDNA

๐Ÿšจ Flare Recognition & Management

Early Warning Signs

  • Rising anti-dsDNA levels
  • Declining complement (C3, C4)
  • Increasing proteinuria
  • New systemic symptoms
  • Rising creatinine

Flare Management

  • Mild flare: Increase prednisone
  • Moderate flare: IV methylprednisolone
  • Severe flare: Repeat induction protocol
  • Consider: Rituximab for refractory disease

Emerging & Revolutionary Therapies in Lupus Nephritis

๐ŸŽ† The Future of Lupus Nephritis Treatment

The landscape of lupus nephritis treatment is rapidly evolving with breakthrough therapies showing unprecedented efficacy. These novel approaches target specific pathways and offer hope for superior outcomes with reduced toxicity.

๐ŸŒŸ Obinutuzumab (Gazyva) - Game Changer

Mechanism: Glycoengineered anti-CD20 type II monoclonal antibody

Advantages over Rituximab:

  • Enhanced B-cell depletion: Superior direct cell death and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity
  • Clinical efficacy: Phase II/III trials show superior response rates in lupus nephritis
  • Faster onset: More rapid B-cell depletion compared to rituximab
  • Glycoengineering: Modified Fc region for enhanced binding to immune effector cells

Dosing: 1000mg IV on days 1, 8, 15 of cycle 1, then 1000mg on day 1 of subsequent cycles

Clinical Evidence: NOBILITY study and other trials showing 60-70% complete response rates

Status: Under FDA review for lupus nephritis indication

๐ŸŽ† Belimumab (Benlysta) - Precision Targeting

Mechanism: Human monoclonal antibody against BLyS/BAFF (B-lymphocyte stimulator)

Unique Advantages:

  • Targeted B-cell regulation: Blocks B-cell survival signals without complete depletion
  • FDA approved for SLE: Only biologic approved for systemic lupus
  • Add-on therapy: Enhances efficacy when combined with standard treatment
  • Steroid-sparing: Allows significant corticosteroid reduction

Dosing: 10mg/kg IV every 2 weeks ร— 3 doses, then every 4 weeks

Clinical Evidence: BLISS-LN trial showed improved response rates in lupus nephritis

Current Use: FDA-approved for SLE, expanding use in lupus nephritis

๐Ÿงฌ CAR-T Cell Therapy - Revolutionary Potential

Mechanism: Genetically modified autologous T-cells targeting CD19+ B-cells

Breakthrough Concept:

  • "Reset" immune system: Deep B-cell depletion followed by immune reconstitution
  • Durable remissions: Potential for long-term drug-free remission
  • Severe disease: Reserved for refractory, life-threatening cases
  • One-time treatment: Single infusion with lasting effects

Clinical Status: Early-phase trials in severe autoimmune diseases

Results: Preliminary data shows sustained remissions in refractory SLE

Challenges: Cytokine release syndrome, cost, specialized centers required

Future: May revolutionize treatment of severe lupus nephritis

๐ŸŒฑ Additional Emerging Therapies

Anifrolumab (Saphnelo):

  • Type I interferon receptor antagonist
  • FDA-approved for non-renal SLE
  • Under investigation for lupus nephritis

Voclosporin (Lupkynis) - FDA Approved 2021:

  • Revolutionary approach: First CNI specifically approved for lupus nephritis
  • AURORA trial success: 40.8% complete response vs 22.5% with MMF alone
  • Combination therapy: Used with low-dose MMF (1g BID) + corticosteroids
  • Steroid-sparing: Allows faster corticosteroid tapering
  • Dosing: 23.7mg twice daily with food
  • Monitoring: Target trough levels 10-15 ng/mL

Dual B-cell targeting:

  • Combination obinutuzumab + belimumab
  • Targeting multiple B-cell pathways
  • Enhanced efficacy in trials

๐ŸŽฏ Treatment Selection Algorithm for 2025

First-Line Induction (Updated 2025)

  • Option 1: MMF + corticosteroids (traditional)
  • Option 2: Voclosporin + MMF (superior efficacy)
  • Young women: Prioritize fertility preservation
  • Enhanced approach: Early belimumab add-on

Refractory Disease

  • Second-line: Obinutuzumab
  • Combination: Dual B-cell targeting
  • Severe cases: Consider CAR-T referral

Steroid Minimization

  • Goal: โ‰ค5mg prednisone daily
  • Strategy: Early biologic introduction
  • Monitor: B-cell depletion markers

๐Ÿ”ญ Clinical Trial Considerations

For patients with severe or refractory lupus nephritis, clinical trial participation should be strongly considered. The rapid pace of therapeutic development means that cutting-edge treatments may be available through research protocols before FDA approval.

Key Trial Resources:

  • ClinicalTrials.gov for active lupus nephritis studies
  • Lupus Clinical Trials Consortium
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH) protocols
  • Industry-sponsored phase II/III trials

๐ŸŒ Health Disparities in Lupus Nephritis

โš–๏ธ Racial and Ethnic Disparities

African Americans

  • Prevalence: 3-4ร— higher than Caucasians
  • Age of onset: Earlier (teens-20s)
  • Severity: More severe nephritis
  • ESRD risk: 4ร— higher progression rate
  • Response: Lower response to cyclophosphamide

Hispanic/Latino

  • Prevalence: 2-3ร— higher than Caucasians
  • Severity: More severe disease
  • Access: Barriers to specialist care
  • Outcomes: Higher mortality rates

Asian Populations

  • Genetic factors: HLA associations
  • Clinical features: More Class V nephritis
  • Treatment response: Variable by subgroup

๐ŸŽฏ Addressing Disparities

Clinical Considerations

  • Consider more aggressive initial treatment in high-risk populations
  • MMF may be preferred over cyclophosphamide in African Americans
  • Higher MMF doses (3g vs 2g daily) if tolerated
  • Earlier nephrology referral

Social Determinants

  • Address medication adherence barriers
  • Consider transportation and work limitations
  • Culturally competent care
  • Language interpretation services

๐Ÿ’Ž Clinical Pearls for SLE & Lupus Nephritis

๐Ÿ”ฌ Diagnostic Pearls

  • "Full-house" nephritis: IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q all positive = lupus nephritis
  • C1q deposition: 90% specific for lupus nephritis
  • Tubuloreticular inclusions: Interferon-ฮฑ signature on EM
  • Anti-dsDNA monitoring: Rising levels precede flares by 4-8 weeks

๐Ÿ’Š Treatment Pearls

  • MMF + voclosporin option: Superior to MMF alone (AURORA trial), especially for severe disease
  • MMF monotherapy limitations: May be insufficient for Class IV nephritis - consider combination therapy
  • Obinutuzumab superiority: Enhanced B-cell depletion vs rituximab in lupus nephritis trials
  • Belimumab add-on strategy: Consider early in treatment to enhance steroid-sparing
  • Voclosporin (Lupkynis): FDA-approved novel CNI for lupus nephritis (2021)
  • CAR-T future: Revolutionary potential for refractory disease
  • Steroid minimization goal: โ‰ค5mg prednisone daily with biologics
  • Hydroxychloroquine: Continue throughout pregnancy and treatment

๐Ÿ‘ฉ Women's Health Pearls

  • Fertility planning: Switch MMF to AZA 3 months before conception
  • Contraception: Avoid estrogen if antiphospholipid antibodies positive
  • Pregnancy monitoring: Low complement differentiates flare from preeclampsia
  • Bone health: Calcium + Vitamin D for all steroid users

๐Ÿ“Š Monitoring Pearls

  • Response criteria: >50% proteinuria reduction at 6 months
  • Complete remission: Proteinuria <0.5g/24h
  • B-cell monitoring: CD19+ counts with obinutuzumab/rituximab therapy
  • Flare prediction: Serial anti-dsDNA + complement levels
  • Biologic efficacy: Earlier response seen with novel agents
  • Drug levels: Monitor CNI trough levels (voclosporin target 10-15 ng/mL)

๐Ÿ”— Integration with Case 7: Lupus Nephritis

This comprehensive SLE module directly supports Case 7: Lupus Nephritis in Young Woman, providing the foundational knowledge needed to understand the complex case presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment decisions. The case applies these concepts in a real clinical scenario.

๐Ÿ“‹ Case Application

  • 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria scoring
  • ISN/RPS Class IV classification
  • MMF vs cyclophosphamide selection
  • Young women considerations

๐Ÿงช Laboratory Integration

  • Anti-dsDNA and complement interpretation
  • "Full-house" nephritis pattern
  • Activity vs chronicity indices
  • Treatment response monitoring

๐Ÿ’Š Treatment Decisions

  • Evidence-based induction protocols
  • Fertility preservation strategies
  • Contraception counseling
  • Long-term maintenance planning
๐Ÿ“‹ Study Case 7: Lupus Nephritis ๐ŸŽ† Emerging Therapies Section ๐Ÿ”ฌ Return to Glomerulonephritis Main