Acid–Base Analysis: Find Every Process

Lecture collection · Visual teaching summary · October 3, 2026

Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP

Visual summary

Calculate compensation and the gap, then use the mismatch to find an additional disorder; a plausible first diagnosis is not the stopping point.

Acid–Base Analysis: Find Every Process. Full text follows below.
Download infographic (PNG) · Download Markdown · Read text version ·

Text version

Name the direction

Acidemia is pH <7.35; alkalemia >7.45. Low bicarbonate suggests metabolic acidosis, high bicarbonate metabolic alkalosis; PaCO₂ moves pH in the opposite direction. A normal pH can hide opposing disorders, so always inspect all three values.

Test metabolic-acidosis compensation

Expected PaCO₂ ≈ 1.5 × HCO₃ + 8 ±2 mmHg. A measured value above this suggests added respiratory acidosis; below it suggests respiratory alkalosis. This is an approximation for metabolic acidosis, not a formula for every acid–base disorder.

Calculate and contextualize the gap

AG = Na − (Cl + HCO₃), using the laboratory’s reference interval. Low albumin can conceal unmeasured acids; a common correction adds about 2.5 mEq/L for each 1 g/dL albumin below 4. Check lactate, ketones, kidney function, or toxins as indicated.

Search for a second metabolic process

Compare the rise in AG with the fall in bicarbonate from their expected baselines. A disproportionately preserved/high bicarbonate suggests added alkalosis; a larger bicarbonate fall suggests added normal-gap acidosis. Baseline variation and treatment can distort delta comparisons.

Worked calculation

Synthetic example: Na 140, Cl 100, HCO₃ 12 gives AG 28. Expected PaCO₂ is 26 ±2. If measured PaCO₂ is 40, respiratory compensation is inadequate and an additional respiratory acidosis is present; assess ventilation urgently alongside the metabolic cause.

Recalculate as treatment changes physiology

Vomiting can add alkalosis to DKA; saline can add normal-gap acidosis during recovery. Use measurements obtained close together, treat the underlying causes and potassium abnormalities, and repeat assessment rather than assuming the first diagnostic label remains complete.

Supporting evidence

Continue learning