Education Use Only
For educational use only — Not for clinical decision-making without independent verification
Medical Associates  ·  Department of Nephrology ← Maintenance Hemodialysis  ·  urinenephrology.org
Clinical Mastery Series · Maintenance Hemodialysis

Inflammation and Fish Oil (PISCES) in Hemodialysis

Maintenance Hemodialysis — what inflammation predicts, which sources you can remove, where IL-6 blockade stands, and what PISCES does and does not prove
Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP UICOMP · UDPA · Butler COM Reviewed September 2026 22 min read

Part of the Maintenance Hemodialysis mastery module. This page covers inflammation in hemodialysis — what it predicts, where it comes from, and where IL-6 blockade stands — and the evidence on fish oil, centered on the PISCES trial. Protein-energy wasting, nutritional assessment, and dietary targets are on the companion page, Nutrition and protein-energy wasting on hemodialysis.

Bottom line

PISCES is the first large positive cardiovascular prevention trial in hemodialysis. It is a single trial, and it says nothing about nutrition.

  • Inflammation predicts cardiovascular death. In observational cohorts, cardiovascular mortality was 23% versus 5% with a CRP above versus below 8 mg/L 1, and each 1-log rise in IL-6 carried an HR of 1.43 for cardiovascular death 2. Remove the sources first, starting with catheters 3.
  • IL-6 blockade is not ready for dialysis. Ziltivekimab failed in ZEUS, a non-dialysis CKD outcome trial (MACE HR 0.99) 4. The dialysis outcome trial of clazakizumab is still recruiting, with primary completion estimated in 2029 5.
  • PISCES (RCT; NEJM 2026, online November 2025): 1,228 hemodialysis patients took four 1-g capsules a day — 2.4 g EPA+DHA — or corn oil. Serious cardiovascular events, counting recurrences, fell with fish oil: HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.47–0.70) 6.
  • Patient-level result: 20.8% versus 33.7% had at least one serious cardiovascular event — ARR 12.9 percentage points, NNT 8 over a mean of approximately 2.3 years. All-cause death did not differ significantly (HR 0.89). Serious bleeding was not increased (4.8% versus 7.6%) 6.
  • Fish oil does not meaningfully raise albumin in hemodialysis. Pooled estimates run from 0.00 g/dL 7 to +0.14 g/dL (95% CI 0.01–0.28; I² 87.5%) 8, and PISCES measured albumin only at baseline 6. CRP falls modestly in some pools but not in KDOQI’s 9,10. Prescribe it for the cardiovascular result, not for nutrition.
  • Guidelines lag the trial. KDOQI 2020 predates PISCES and suggests against routine use (2B) 9; UpToDate (updated November 2025) suggests fish oil for maintenance dialysis patients (Grade 2B). Dose by EPA+DHA content. Prescription omega-3 products are off-label for this use 11,12.

1. What inflammation predicts

  • CRP (observational). In a 1999 cohort, CRP above 8 mg/L was present in 46% of hemodialysis patients without apparent infection. Overall mortality was 31% versus 16%, and cardiovascular mortality 23% versus 5%, with elevated versus normal CRP 1. In a multinational DOPPS analysis, CRP’s association with 1-year mortality had no safe threshold, and CRP added more predictive information than albumin, ferritin, or white-cell count 13.
  • IL-6 (observational). In patients starting dialysis, IL-6 quartile stratified survival in both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis 14. In prevalent hemodialysis, each 1-log rise in plasma IL-6 carried an adjusted HR of 1.19 for death and 1.43 for cardiovascular death 2.
  • Consequences. Inflammation is linked to cardiovascular death 1,2,15, wasting and hypoalbuminemia 16,17,18, and ESA hyporesponsiveness through hepcidin (see Anemia: targets, ESAs, and hyporesponsiveness).

Albumin is partly an inflammation marker: inflammation lowers it by speeding its breakdown, while diet mainly affects its synthesis 17,18.

CRP is not a routine monthly test in most US units; it is worth ordering when albumin falls without a dietary cause, ESA needs climb, or hidden infection is suspected.

2. Sources of inflammation you can remove

SourceEvidenceAction
Tunneled catheterConverting from a non-infected catheter to a working fistula lowered CRP 82% at 6 months (observational) 3. In the CHOICE cohort, catheters carried 62% higher average CRP than fistulas, and the catheter-mortality association weakened after adjustment for inflammation 19Remove the catheter as soon as the fistula is usable (Catheter care; AVF/AVG)
Old, nonfunctioning AV graftsIn 22 patients with occult infection of abandoned grafts, resection raised hemoglobin from 9.2 to 11.6 g/dL and albumin from 3.3 to 3.8 g/dL, and halved weekly epoetin (14,240 to 6,675 units) (case series) 20In an inflamed patient with an abandoned graft, consider nuclear imaging, such as an indium scan, and resection
Periodontal diseaseSevere periodontitis is associated with albumin below 3.5 g/dL 21 and with cardiovascular death on hemodialysis 22. In an uncontrolled series of 30, periodontal treatment lowered hs-CRP and epoetin needs and raised albumin 23Ask about teeth and gums; a dental referral is cheap
Dialysate purityUltrapure dialysate lowered CRP and modestly raised albumin in a meta-analysis 24Water treatment and endotoxin monitoring
Membrane and modalityHigh-volume hemodiafiltration lowered all-cause mortality in the CONVINCE RCT (HR 0.77) 25A modality decision, not an anti-inflammatory prescription

3. Ultrapure dialysate

Dialysate is not sterile. Bacterial fragments and endotoxin cross high-flux membranes and stimulate cytokines.

  • Before–after cohort (Schiffl 2001): switching to ultrapure fluid lowered IL-6 and CRP and raised dry weight, albumin, and nPCR over 12 months 26.
  • Meta-analysis (Susantitaphong 2013; 31 studies, 23 pooled arms, 2,221 patients): ultrapure dialysate lowered CRP by 3.2 mg/L, raised albumin by 0.11 g/dL and hemoglobin by 0.40 g/dL, and reduced weekly epoetin by 273 units; the results held in controlled trials 24.
  • National cohort (Hasegawa 2015; 130,781 patients): facility dialysate endotoxin of 0.1 EU/mL or more was associated with 28% higher 1-year mortality than endotoxin below 0.001 EU/mL 27.
  • Randomized outcome trial (Asci 2013; 704 patients): ultrapure versus standard dialysate did not reduce cardiovascular events (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.61–1.32); a post hoc benefit after more than 3 years on dialysis is hypothesis-generating 28.

US facilities must meet the AAMI RD52:2004 water and dialysate standard incorporated in the federal Conditions for Coverage 29. Ultrapure fluid consistently improves surrogate inflammation markers. It has not been shown to prevent cardiovascular events.

4. IL-6 inhibition (status September 2026)

IL-6 sits upstream of CRP, fibrinogen, serum amyloid A, hepcidin, and the albumin catabolic rate. It is the obvious target. It has not yet delivered.

Agent and trialPopulationFindingsStatus
Ziltivekimab, phase 1/2 and phase 2 (RESCUE) RCTs 30,3161 inflamed hemodialysis patients; 264 with CKD stages 3–5Lower hs-CRP (77–92% in RESCUE); in hemodialysis, less ESA use and higher albumin and TSAT, with 4 deaths from treatment-emergent events in the 6- and 20-mg cohortsComplete
ZEUS, ziltivekimab phase 3 outcome RCT 4,32Atherosclerotic disease plus non-dialysis CKD (mean eGFR 44.5); hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L; 6,376 patientsMACE HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.88–1.11) despite lower free IL-6 and hs-CRP; more serious infections; no mortality differenceNegative (top-line result, July 31, 2026; not yet peer reviewed)
Clazakizumab, phase 2b RCT 33,34Dialysis with cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes; hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L; 127 patientshs-CRP down 86–92%; albumin +0.21 to +0.28 g/dL; hepcidin down 37–44%; no hemoglobin effect at 12 weeks. Serious infections 12.5%, 9.4%, and 28.1% (2.5, 5, and 10 mg) versus 6.5% with placeboComplete
Clazakizumab, POSIBIL6ESKD phase 3 5Dialysis for at least 12 weeks; hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L; diabetes or atherosclerotic disease; target 3,110Primary endpoint: time to cardiovascular death or MIRecruiting; primary completion estimated May 2029

Appraisal. Every dialysis IL-6 result so far is a surrogate. ZEUS is the warning: suppressing the biomarker in non-dialysis CKD did not move MACE, and serious infections increased 4. Infection is the second leading cause of death on hemodialysis 35, and the 10-mg clazakizumab arm quadrupled serious infections in 12 weeks 33. Until the phase 3 dialysis trial reports, anti-cytokine therapy has no place outside a trial.

5. Omega-3 fatty acids before PISCES

The biology was always plausible. Hemodialysis patients have low circulating long-chain omega-3 levels 6. In incident US hemodialysis patients (observational), the highest quartile of omega-3 levels carried one-fifth the odds of first-year sudden cardiac death of the lowest (OR 0.20) 36. Reported fish intake was associated with about 50% lower mortality in a small cohort 37.

Earlier randomized trials in dialysis were small or aimed at access. OPACH (206 patients with prior cardiovascular disease; EPA 0.77 g + DHA 0.64 g/day) found no difference in cardiovascular events plus death (62 versus 59 events), with fewer MIs as a secondary finding (4 versus 13) 9,38. FISH (201 new AV grafts; 1.6 g EPA + 0.8 g DHA versus corn oil) missed its graft-patency endpoint (48% versus 62% loss of patency; RR 0.78, 0.60–1.03) but showed better cardiovascular event-free survival as a secondary outcome (HR 0.43; 0.19–0.96) 39. FAVOURED (567 new fistulas) was null for fistula failure 40, and a 24-patient graft trial with a striking patency result was never replicated 41.

A 2020 meta-analysis of 60 trials (4,129 participants, median follow-up 6 months) found low-certainty evidence that omega-3 supplementation reduced cardiovascular death in hemodialysis (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23–0.89), based on only 39 events, with no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 1.05) 42. That is where KDOQI 2020 stood: plausible biology, one suggestive secondary endpoint, and no adequately powered trial. It suggested against routine use (2B) and named PISCES as the pending answer 9.

6. PISCES: the trial

Lok CE et al. N Engl J Med 2026;394:128–137, published online November 7, 2025 6. The protocol was published in January 2024 43.

ElementDetail
DesignDouble-blind, placebo-controlled RCT at 26 sites in Canada and Australia; enrollment November 2013 to July 2019; last follow-up March 31, 2023
Population1,228 clinically stable adults on hemodialysis 3–4 times weekly; excluded if already taking omega-3 supplements or allergic to fish, soy, or corn. Mean age 64; 55% with diabetes; 35% with a prior cardiovascular event; 56% on statins; median triglycerides 1.29–1.35 mmol/L (about 115–120 mg/dL), so not a hypertriglyceridemic population
InterventionFour 1-g capsules daily, 40:20 ethyl ester: 1.6 g EPA + 0.8 g DHA = 2.4 g EPA+DHA per day. The “4 g” often quoted is capsule weight
ComparatorIdentical citrus-flavored corn-oil capsules
Primary endpointAll serious cardiovascular events, first and recurrent: cardiac death (sudden and nonsudden), fatal and nonfatal MI, fatal and nonfatal stroke, and peripheral vascular disease leading to amputation. Heart failure was excluded because fluid overload on hemodialysis is often non-cardiac. Blinded central adjudication
Analysis and powerRecurrent-event (Prentice–Williams–Peterson) model, intention to treat; powered to detect HR 0.825
FundingPublic and charitable funders; capsules and placebo donated by the manufacturer

7. PISCES: results

EndpointFish oil (n = 610)Placebo (n = 618)HR (95% CI)
All serious cardiovascular events (events; rate per 1,000 patient-days)158; 0.31309; 0.610.57 (0.47–0.70)
  with a prior cardiovascular event81; 0.43164; 0.910.50 (0.37–0.67)
  without a prior cardiovascular event77; 0.24145; 0.450.55 (0.40–0.76)
Primary events plus noncardiac death266; 0.52381; 0.760.77 (0.65–0.90)
Death from any cause1751950.89, not significant

From Table 2 of the paper; follow-up 1,394 and 1,382 patient-years. Confidence intervals for secondary endpoints were not adjusted for multiplicity 6.

In absolute terms

Patient-level proportions over a mean of about 2.3 years, with HRs where the paper reports them. ARR and NNT are crude values derived from the published proportions; the paper cautions that its binary analyses do not account for differential follow-up 6.

OutcomeFish oilPlaceboHRARR (points)NNT
At least one serious cardiovascular event20.8% (127/610)33.7% (208/618)—12.98
Two or more serious cardiovascular events4.3%10.5%—6.216
First cardiovascular event or death35.2%43.7%0.73 (0.61–0.87)8.512
Cardiac death10.3%18.3%0.55 (0.40–0.75)8.0 (3.9–12.0)13
Fatal or nonfatal MI6.9%11.7%0.56 (0.40–0.80)4.821
Fatal or nonfatal stroke1.6%4.5%0.37 (0.18–0.76)2.934
Amputation for peripheral vascular disease4.9%7.1%0.57 (0.38–0.86)2.245
Death from any cause28.7%31.6%0.89Not significant—
Serious bleeding4.8%7.6%—2.8 fewer with fish oil—

Event rates were 11.3 versus 22.4 per 100 patient-years, about 11 events prevented per 100 patient-years of treatment. That figure describes events, not people; quoting it as an “11% per year” absolute risk reduction mislabels an event rate as a patient-level risk 6.

Safety. Serious bleeding (not adjudicated) was 4.8% versus 7.6%, gastrointestinal 2.6% versus 4.2%. Serious infections (20.3% versus 17.8%) and respiratory events (5.1% versus 3.7%) showed numerical imbalances that the editorialists flagged 6,35. Atrial fibrillation was not reported as a safety outcome 6.

8. PISCES: critical appraisal

  1. The effect is larger than the trial was designed to find. The investigators powered for HR 0.825 and observed 0.57 6. Large effects in moderate-sized trials often shrink on replication. The NEJM editorial and a 2026 review both asked for a larger confirmatory trial before fish oil becomes standard care 35,44.
  2. The primary endpoint counts repeat events. That captures total burden where events cluster 45, but it weights patients with many events, and correspondents argued that it may amplify benefit while survival barely moves 46. The first-event and component analyses point the same way: first cardiovascular event or death HR 0.73; cardiac death HR 0.55 6,47.
  3. Nobody lived longer. There were 175 versus 195 deaths (HR 0.89) 6. Subtracting primary events from the “primary events plus noncardiac death” composite leaves 108 noncardiac deaths with fish oil versus 72 with placebo (derived) 6. The authors proposed competing risk: fewer cardiovascular deaths left more patients alive to die of infection or withdrawal from dialysis 47. That is plausible, but the net survival effect is what patients experience. The authors’ reply reports all-cause HR 0.90 (0.72–1.13) from a different model 47. Either way, no survival benefit was shown.
  4. The placebo was corn oil, not mineral oil. The mineral-oil comparator in REDUCE-IT raised IL-6 16%, hs-CRP 22%, and oxidized LDL 11% over 12 months 48. PISCES used corn oil, as STRENGTH did 49. The placebo event rate (0.61) was below the design assumption (0.74), so if corn oil did anything, it probably biased the result toward the null 6,47,50.
  5. Who was studied. Patients in Canada and Australia with low lipid levels, 35% with prior cardiovascular disease; effect estimates were similar with and without it 6,47. Baseline omega-3 status was measured in only about 20% of participants, so whether patients who already eat a lot of fish benefit is unanswered 47,51. PISCES did not recruit in the United States, despite the editorial’s statement that it did 6,35.
  6. Adherence and prespecification. EPA was measured only once, at 3 months in a random sample; placebo patients showed no rise, which argues against drop-in use of over-the-counter fish oil 6. The trial was registered (ISRCTN00691795), but the full protocol with the recurrent-event plan was published in January 2024, after the last follow-up visit 6,43.
  7. Arrhythmia was not reported. PISCES reported neither atrial fibrillation nor sudden cardiac death separately, and its mechanism of benefit is unknown 6,44. In general-population trials, omega-3 supplementation increases atrial fibrillation 52.
  8. Secondary sources already garble it. One 2026 review puts heart-failure hospitalization and arrhythmia in the primary endpoint, which the NEJM paper did not 45. Cite the primary paper.

Post-PISCES synthesis. A 2026 meta-analysis of 13 hemodialysis RCTs (2,755 patients), dominated by PISCES, found lower cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42–0.71) and unchanged all-cause mortality (RR 0.93; 0.80–1.08) 53.

9. How PISCES fits the other omega-3 trials

Trial (RCT)PopulationProduct, daily doseComparatorPrimary resultARR; NNT
REDUCE-IT 548,179 with elevated triglycerides despite statinsIcosapent ethyl (EPA) 4 gMineral oil17.2% vs 22.0%; HR 0.75 (0.68–0.83)4.8 points; 21 over 4.9 years
STRENGTH 4913,078 at high risk, high triglyceridesEPA+DHA carboxylic acids 4 gCorn oil12.0% vs 12.2%; HR 0.99 (0.90–1.09); stopped for futilityNone
VITAL 5525,871 general populationEPA+DHA 840 mgPlaceboHR 0.92 (0.80–1.06)None
PISCES 61,228 on hemodialysisEPA 1.6 g + DHA 0.8 g ethyl estersCorn oilRecurrent cardiovascular events HR 0.5712.9 points (at least one event); 8 over a mean of 2.3 years

Three explanations are offered for why PISCES stands apart, and none is proven 6,35,44,45:

  • Baseline risk. A third of the placebo group had an event in about 2.3 years, and absolute benefit scales with absolute risk 6.
  • Low baseline omega-3 levels in dialysis patients 6.
  • Not the comparator. STRENGTH used the same corn-oil placebo with a DHA-containing product at a similar dose and was null in non-dialysis patients 49, so the mineral-oil critique of REDUCE-IT does not explain the gap. That makes replication more pressing.

The atrial fibrillation signal. Across 7 outcome trials, marine omega-3 supplementation was associated with atrial fibrillation (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07–1.46), and HR 1.49 at doses above 1 g/day 52; VITAL Rhythm, at 840 mg/day, found no significant increase 56. Both prescription labels carry atrial fibrillation warnings 11,12.

10. Products and doses

The PISCES regimen was 2.4 g/day of EPA+DHA as ethyl esters, in a 2:1 EPA:DHA ratio 6. Dose by the EPA+DHA total, not by capsule weight or the words “fish oil.”

Product typeEPA + DHA per capsuleCapsules for approximately 2.4 g EPA+DHA/dayRegulatory status
PISCES trial capsule (40:20 ethyl ester) 6400 mg EPA + 200 mg DHA4Trial product
Prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters 11Approximately 465 mg EPA + 375 mg DHA (EPA:DHA about 1.2:1)3 (2.5 g)FDA-labeled only for triglycerides ≥500 mg/dL; its effect on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity “has not been determined”
Prescription icosapent ethyl 121 g EPA only (or 0.5-g capsules)Not equivalent: EPA only, labeled at 4 g/dayFDA-labeled for cardiovascular risk reduction with triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL on maximal statin therapy; not tested in hemodialysis
Over-the-counter fish oil 57,58Varies widely; read the Supplement Facts panel for EPA and DHADepends on concentrationDietary supplement; content and oxidation vary, and in one national market only 3 of 32 products met their labeled content
Off-label use

Neither prescription product is labeled for the PISCES indication — cardiovascular prevention in hemodialysis patients regardless of triglyceride level. Prescribing either for that purpose is off-label, and neither is the PISCES formulation 6,11,12.

  • A capsule labeled “1,000 mg fish oil” is not 1,000 mg of EPA plus DHA 57.
  • Four capsules a day, not necessarily at separate times, adds to a heavy pill burden 6.
  • Cost determines uptake: in an Austrian survey of 525 hemodialysis patients, 79.4% would take fish oil if reimbursed but only 38.1% at €40 per month 59.
  • Over-the-counter products cannot be assumed equivalent to the trial product; that is a limitation to explain, not a reason to withhold the regimen 57,58.
  • Fish or shellfish allergy excluded patients from PISCES, and both prescription labels carry allergy cautions as well as bleeding and atrial fibrillation warnings 6,11,12.

11. What guidelines and references say (September 2026)

  • KDOQI 2020 suggests not routinely prescribing long-chain omega-3 fatty acids to lower mortality (2C) or cardiovascular events (2B) in maintenance hemodialysis, and named PISCES as the ongoing trial that would address the question 9. It was written before PISCES.
  • KDIGO has no statement as of September 2026, and KDOQI has not updated its guidance.
  • UpToDate (Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in end-stage kidney disease (dialysis), updated November 21, 2025) suggests fish oil supplements for patients on maintenance dialysis (Grade 2B) to prevent new and recurrent cardiovascular events, and states that confirmatory trials are warranted.
  • Commentaries favor confirmation before universal adoption while acknowledging that some physicians will recommend fish oil now 35,44,45.

12. Fish oil, albumin, and inflammatory markers

Bottom line for this section

Omega-3 does not meaningfully raise serum albumin in hemodialysis, and the only trial powered for albumin was null. It probably lowers CRP modestly, mostly in patients who start inflamed. Certainty is low for both. The reason to prescribe fish oil is the PISCES cardiovascular result, not nutrition 6,7,8,60.

PISCES did not measure albumin as an outcome

PISCES measured albumin only at baseline: 38 g/L (IQR 35–40), that is, 3.8 g/dL in both arms (Supplementary Appendix, Table S3) 6. No follow-up albumin, nutrition, inflammation, or lipid value appears in the paper or its appendix, and the protocol never mentions albumin 6,43. The only follow-up laboratory measure was plasma phospholipid EPA + DHA at 3 months in 232 patients: +1.92 percentage points versus placebo (95% CI 1.46–2.38) 6. This was a well-nourished (mean BMI about 27 kg/m²), normotriglyceridemic population, and the trial cannot say whether its benefit ran through nutrition or inflammation.

The meta-analysis that reported an albumin rise

Bagheri 2023 (Nutrition Reviews) pooled 50 RCTs framed as studies of “hospitalized patients.” Its dialysis estimate was +0.14 g/dL (95% CI 0.01–0.28; P = 0.042; I² 87.5%) across 15 trials: borderline and highly heterogeneous 8. It does not survive a close read:

  • No dose–response. The effect was significant only below 1,000 mg/day, and the linear estimate was +0.03 g/dL per 1,000 mg/day (−0.03 to 0.09; P = 0.304). The PISCES dose of 2.4 g/day sits outside the only significant dose subgroup 6,8.
  • Risk of bias: 11 of the 15 dialysis trials were rated high risk and 1 low 8. That one low-risk trial (Asemi 2016) 61 comes from a trial whose companion report carries a 2023 expression of concern 62.
  • Design mix: four comparisons had no placebo, and one “hemodialysis” trial enrolled peritoneal dialysis patients 8,63.
  • Size: IL-6 blockade raised albumin 0.21–0.28 g/dL in 12 weeks 33; a supplement achieving more than half of that would be surprising.

The other pooled analyses

The largest dialysis-specific pool, Liu 2022 (14 trials), found a mean difference of 0.00 g/dL (−0.05 to 0.04) 7. Three smaller pools agree that there is no reliable effect: He 2016, 0.12 (−0.56 to 0.80) across 5 trials 64; Dezfouli 2020, a standardized mean difference of 0.91 (−0.78 to 2.59) that its text reports as g/dL, although the four trials’ raw between-group changes were +0.2, 0.0, +0.4, and −0.1 g/dL 65; and Xu 2016, −0.33 (−0.83 to 0.17), the wrong direction 66. KDOQI 2020 did not analyze albumin 9.

The randomized trials in maintenance hemodialysis

Twelve placebo- or oil-controlled RCTs have reported albumin, nutritional, or inflammatory outcomes in hemodialysis. None ran longer than 6 months, the largest with an albumin result enrolled 120 patients, and albumin was the primary outcome in none 60,61,62,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77.

  • Daud 2012 (63 randomized, albumin ≤3.9 g/dL; 2.4 g EPA+DHA three times weekly after dialysis, directly observed, plus protein in both arms; 6 months) is the only trial sized for albumin: +0.1 ± 0.3 versus 0.0 ± 0.3 g/dL (P = 0.295). MIS, nPNA, BMI, and CRP did not change 60.
  • Null for albumin or nutritional indices: Gharekhani 2014, Moeinzadeh 2016, Valle Flores 2020, Zakaria 2021, and Abbas Torki 2024 69,72,73,75,76.
  • Albumin reported only incidentally: Saifullah 2007 and Hung 2015, with between-group changes of −0.1 and +0.4 g/dL as extracted by Dezfouli 65,67,70.
  • The two positive trials are the weakest. Asemi 2016 reported better MIS with omega-3, but its companion report carries an expression of concern 61,62. Zhang 2020 compared end-of-study PEW prevalence (38% versus 68%), not change, at 0.53 g/day EPA+DHA 74.

The large outcome trials (FISH, OPACH, FAVOURED) did not report albumin 38,39,40. The belief that fish oil raises albumin traces largely to uncontrolled before–after and non-randomized studies, which cannot exclude regression to the mean 78,79.

CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and triglycerides

MarkerMeta-analysisEffect (95% CI)
CRPKDOQI 2020 910 hemodialysis trials: −1.73 mg/L (−3.54 to 0.09), not significant
CRPZhou 2022 1011 RCTs: −3.36 mg/L (−5.46 to −1.26); baseline CRP ≥5 mg/L: −4.43 (−6.10 to −2.76)
CRPFatima 2024; Liu 2022 7,80−2.92 mg/L (−5.23 to −0.61), I² 99%; −1.14 (−1.31 to −0.97), I² 92%
CRPBlair 2026 81Ethyl esters, the PISCES formulation: SMD −0.26 (−0.54 to 0.01), P = 0.06
IL-6, TNF-αKDOQI 2020; Zhou 2022; Liu 2022 7,9,10Inconsistent in direction and significance across pools
TriglyceridesKDOQI 2020 912 trials: −33.78 mg/dL (−63.21 to −4.36)

CRP falls by roughly 1–3 mg/L, mostly in patients who start above 5 mg/L 10. The guideline’s own pool was not significant 9, and the ethyl-ester formulation PISCES used did not significantly lower CRP in Blair’s subgroup 81. Liu’s CRP interval is implausibly narrow for 20 heterogeneous trials 7. The triglyceride effect is the most reproducible metabolic finding, and KDOQI suggests 1.3–4 g/day to lower triglycerides and LDL (2C) 9. Flaxseed oil lowered CRP in small trials 82,83,84, but its alpha-linolenic acid is not EPA or DHA, and PISCES does not apply to it.

What to do with it

  • Do not prescribe fish oil to raise albumin. If albumin is the concern, look for the inflammation and fix intake; see Nutrition and protein-energy wasting on hemodialysis.
  • Expect no change on the monthly lab. A patient’s albumin moving on fish oil reflects inflammation and intake, not the capsules. Clazakizumab cut hs-CRP 86–92% and moved albumin only 0.21–0.28 g/dL 33; omega-3 lowers CRP by 1–3 mg/L at best 10,80.
  • When fish oil is prescribed, prescribe it for the PISCES cardiovascular result 6.

13. Who might be offered fish oil

PISCES is a well-conducted, academically funded, double-blind trial with a large effect on cardiovascular events and no survival benefit. It is one trial. The known harms are small; the unmeasured one, atrial fibrillation, is real in other populations 6,52.

A reasonable approach is to offer it through shared decision-making to stable hemodialysis patients resembling the PISCES population, with or without prior cardiovascular disease 6, who:

  • have no fish or shellfish allergy;
  • can manage four more capsules a day; and
  • are not in hospice or a comfort-focused plan in which a two-year cardiovascular benefit is not the goal.

Discuss first — these were not exclusions in PISCES, but the risks are unstudied or labeled:

  • paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, given the label warnings and the absence of atrial fibrillation data from PISCES 11,12,52;
  • anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy: 23% of PISCES participants took an anticoagulant or a non-aspirin antiplatelet agent, which is not evidence for triple therapy 6;
  • LDL cholesterol concerns with DHA-containing products 11.
What to tell patients

“In one large trial, fish-oil capsules cut serious heart and circulation events by about 40%. Out of 8 people who took it for about 2 years, 1 avoided a heart attack, stroke, amputation, or cardiac death. It did not make people live longer overall. It did not cause more bleeding. It still needs to be confirmed.” 6

What to monitor

ItemWhyHow often
Adherence and daily EPA+DHA doseBenefit depends on the dose actually taken 6Monthly medication review
Gastrointestinal tolerance (burping, taste, diarrhea)GI events were more common with a carboxylic-acid omega-3 product in STRENGTH (24.7% vs 14.7%) 49Early, then as needed
Bleeding: gastrointestinal, access, prolonged needle-site bleedingLabel bleeding warnings 11,12; PISCES found less serious bleeding 6Every treatment (already routine)
New palpitations or an irregular pulseAtrial fibrillation signal in general-population trials 52Every treatment
LDL cholesterol with DHA-containing productsLabel: LDL may rise in some patients 11Periodically

Evidence gaps

  1. PISCES needs replication, ideally in the United States, with atrial fibrillation and sudden cardiac death reported, baseline omega-3 status measured in everyone, and a prespecified first-event analysis alongside total events 6,35,44.
  2. Formulation equivalence. Whether prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters (EPA:DHA about 1.2:1) or a well-made over-the-counter concentrate reproduces the 2:1 PISCES product is unknown 11,57.
  3. Competing risk. Why noncardiac deaths rose while cardiac deaths fell in PISCES is unexplained 6,47.
  4. Omega-3 and nutrition. No long, adequately powered trial has tested fish oil against albumin or PEW 8,60.
  5. IL-6 inhibition in dialysis. Outcome data are not expected before 2029, after a negative non-dialysis outcome trial 4,5.
  6. Ultrapure dialysate improves surrogates without proven event reduction 24,28.
  7. Periodontal treatment has only uncontrolled evidence 23.

At the chair

For the dialysis nurse
  • Ask patients on fish oil whether they are taking it and how many capsules a day, count EPA plus DHA from the label rather than “fish oil” milligrams, and make sure it is on the dialysis medication list 6,57.
  • Report black stools, needle-site bleeding that will not stop, new palpitations or an irregular pulse, or a newly discovered fish or shellfish allergy 11,12,52.
  • Do not stop fish oil for a procedure without asking the nephrologist; PISCES found less serious bleeding, not more 6.
  • Report possible inflammatory sources: fever, catheter exit-site or tunnel redness, redness or tenderness over an old graft, and mouth or tooth pain 3,20,23.
  • Treat a falling albumin as a question about inflammation and intake, not about fish oil 7,8,17,18.

Chair-side routines and report triggers are on Nursing card N13 — Nutrition at the chair.

References

Numbered for this page. Every reference is drawn from the canonical evidence review for this module and was verified against its PubMed record or primary document (guideline, federal regulation, FDA label, trial registry, or company announcement) in September 2026.

  1. Zimmermann J, Herrlinger S, Pruy A, Metzger T, Wanner C. Inflammation enhances cardiovascular risk and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999;55(2):648-58. PMID: 9987089
  2. Rao M, Guo D, Perianayagam MC, et al. Plasma interleukin-6 predicts cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(2):324-33. PMID: 15685511
  3. Goldstein SL, Ikizler TA, Zappitelli M, Silverstein DM, Ayus JC. Non-infected hemodialysis catheters are associated with increased inflammation compared to arteriovenous fistulas. Kidney Int. 2009;76(10):1063-9. PMID: 19675528
  4. Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk provides update on the ZEUS phase 3 trial in people with ASCVD, CKD and inflammation. Company announcement (GlobeNewswire), July 31, 2026. Top-line result, not peer reviewed.
  5. CSL Behring. Combined dose-finding and CV outcomes study with CSL300 (clazakizumab) in adult subjects with ESKD undergoing dialysis (POSIBIL6ESKD). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05485961; record last updated September 21, 2026.
  6. Lok CE, Farkouh M, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(2):128-137. PMID: 41201837
  7. Liu R, Jiang J, Fu Z, Liu C, Yao L, Quan H. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake in Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Nutr Assoc. 2022;41(7):697-712. PMID: 34635026
  8. Bagheri A, Soltani S, Asoudeh F, Esmaillzadeh A. Effects of omega-3 supplementation on serum albumin, pre-albumin and the CRP/albumin ratio in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2023;81(3):237-251. PMID: 35939371
  9. Ikizler TA, Burrowes JD, Byham-Gray LD, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in CKD: 2020 Update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76(3 Suppl 1):S1-S107. PMID: 32829751
  10. Zhou J, Tang G, Tang S, Yuan W. The effect of fish oil on inflammation markers in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis: A meta-analysis. Semin Dial. 2022;35(1):6-14. PMID: 34459522
  11. LOVAZA (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) capsules. US prescribing information, DailyMed set ID 21cfa4ce-0b05-47ed-b268-339eb1b83b75, published March 11, 2026.
  12. VASCEPA (icosapent ethyl) capsules. US prescribing information, Amarin Pharma; DailyMed set ID 9c1a2828-1583-4414-ab22-a60480e8e508, published March 30, 2026.
  13. Bazeley J, Bieber B, Li Y, et al. C-reactive protein and prediction of 1-year mortality in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(10):2452-61. PMID: 21868617
  14. Pecoits-Filho R, Bárány P, Lindholm B, Heimbürger O, Stenvinkel P. Interleukin-6 is an independent predictor of mortality in patients starting dialysis treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(9):1684-8. PMID: 12198224
  15. Stenvinkel P, Heimbürger O, Paultre F, et al. Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;55(5):1899-911. PMID: 10231453
  16. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ikizler TA, Block G, Avram MM, Kopple JD. Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in dialysis patients: causes and consequences. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):864-81. PMID: 14582032
  17. Kaysen GA, Dubin JA, Müller HG, Mitch WE, Rosales LM, Levin NW. Relationships among inflammation nutrition and physiologic mechanisms establishing albumin levels in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;61(6):2240-9. PMID: 12028466
  18. Kaysen GA, Chertow GM, Adhikarla R, Young B, Ronco C, Levin NW. Inflammation and dietary protein intake exert competing effects on serum albumin and creatinine in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001;60(1):333-40. PMID: 11422769
  19. Banerjee T, Kim SJ, Astor B, Shafi T, Coresh J, Powe NR. Vascular access type, inflammatory markers, and mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):954-61. PMID: 25266479
  20. Nassar GM, Fishbane S, Ayus JC. Occult infection of old nonfunctioning arteriovenous grafts: a novel cause of erythropoietin resistance and chronic inflammation in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 2002(80):49-54. PMID: 11982813
  21. Kshirsagar AV, Craig RG, Beck JD, et al. Severe periodontitis is associated with low serum albumin among patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(2):239-44. PMID: 17699419
  22. Kshirsagar AV, Craig RG, Moss KL, et al. Periodontal disease adversely affects the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2009;75(7):746-51. PMID: 19165177
  23. Siribamrungwong M, Puangpanngam K. Treatment of periodontal diseases reduces chronic systemic inflammation in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2012;34(2):171-5. PMID: 22229644
  24. Susantitaphong P, Riella C, Jaber BL. Effect of ultrapure dialysate on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, nutrition and anemia parameters: a meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(2):438-46. PMID: 23291370
  25. Blankestijn PJ, Vernooij RWM, Hockham C, et al. Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(8):700-709. PMID: 37326323
  26. Schiffl H, Lang SM, Stratakis D, Fischer R. Effects of ultrapure dialysis fluid on nutritional status and inflammatory parameters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(9):1863-9. PMID: 11522871
  27. Hasegawa T, Nakai S, Masakane I, et al. Dialysis fluid endotoxin level and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis: a nationwide cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6):899-904. PMID: 25641063
  28. Asci G, Töz H, Ozkahya M, et al. The impact of membrane permeability and dialysate purity on cardiovascular outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(6):1014-23. PMID: 23620396
  29. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Conditions for Coverage for End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities. 42 CFR Part 494 (§494.40, §494.80, §494.90, §494.110, §494.140), current as of September 2026. eCFR.
  30. Pergola PE, Devalaraja M, Fishbane S, et al. Ziltivekimab for Treatment of Anemia of Inflammation in Patients on Hemodialysis: Results from a Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(1):211-222. PMID: 33272965
  31. Ridker PM, Devalaraja M, Baeres FMM, et al. IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab in patients at high atherosclerotic risk (RESCUE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10289):2060-2069. PMID: 34015342
  32. Ridker PM, Baeres FMM, Hveplund A, et al. Rationale, Design, and Baseline Clinical Characteristics of the Ziltivekimab Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial: Interleukin-6 Inhibition and Atherosclerotic Event Rate Reduction. JAMA Cardiol. 2026;11(1):89-97. PMID: 41369941
  33. Chertow GM, Chang AM, Felker GM, et al. IL-6 inhibition with clazakizumab in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a randomized phase 2b trial. Nat Med. 2024;30(8):2328-2336. PMID: 38796655
  34. Neuen BL, Catanese B, Chang A, et al. Effects of Clazakizumab on Anemia and Iron Metabolism in Patients with Kidney Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025;36(5):923-925. PMID: 39908111
  35. Mc Causland FR, Charytan DM. Fish Oil for Patients Receiving Hemodialysis — Red Herring or Great Catch? N Engl J Med. 2026;394(2):193-194. PMID: 41201835
  36. Friedman AN, Yu Z, Tabbey R, et al. Inverse relationship between long-chain n-3 fatty acids and risk of sudden cardiac death in patients starting hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2013;83(6):1130-5. PMID: 23389417
  37. Kutner NG, Clow PW, Zhang R, Aviles X. Association of fish intake and survival in a cohort of incident dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(5):1018-24. PMID: 11979345
  38. Svensson M, Schmidt EB, Jørgensen KA, Christensen JH. N-3 fatty acids as secondary prevention against cardiovascular events in patients who undergo chronic hemodialysis: a randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(4):780-6. PMID: 17699287
  39. Lok CE, Moist L, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Effect of fish oil supplementation on graft patency and cardiovascular events among patients with new synthetic arteriovenous hemodialysis grafts: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1809-16. PMID: 22550196
  40. Irish AB, Viecelli AK, Hawley CM, et al. Effect of Fish Oil Supplementation and Aspirin Use on Arteriovenous Fistula Failure in Patients Requiring Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):184-193. PMID: 28055065
  41. Schmitz PG, McCloud LK, Reikes ST, Leonard CL, Gellens ME. Prophylaxis of hemodialysis graft thrombosis with fish oil: double-blind, randomized, prospective trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(1):184-190. PMID: 11752036
  42. Saglimbene VM, Wong G, van Zwieten A, et al. Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake in patients with chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(2):358-368. PMID: 30905498
  43. Lok CE, Hemmelgarn BR, Moist LM, Polkinghorne K, Tomlinson G, Tonelli M. Protection against Incidences of Serious Cardiovascular Events Study with daily fish oil supplementation in dialysis patients (PISCES): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14(1):e072239. PMID: 38199618
  44. Ferro CJ, Thomas MR, Khattak S, Chanouzas D, Townend JN. Fish oil supplements in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2026;19(6):sfag168. PMID: 42293365
  45. Mazón-Ruiz J, de Cos Gomez M, González Bores P, Corral P. Interpreting the PISCES trial on fish oil in hemodialysis patients: lessons on trial design, biological exposure, and outcome measurement. Clin Kidney J. 2026;19(5):sfag118. PMID: 42100717
  46. Marchini M, Trezzi M. Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(3):311-312. PMID: 42456147
  47. Lok CE, Polkinghorne KR, Tomlinson G. Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(3):312. PMID: 42456148
  48. Ridker PM, Rifai N, MacFadyen J, et al. Effects of Randomized Treatment With Icosapent Ethyl and a Mineral Oil Comparator on Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Homocysteine, Lipoprotein(a), and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2: A REDUCE-IT Biomarker Substudy. Circulation. 2022;146(5):372-379. PMID: 35762321
  49. Nicholls SJ, Lincoff AM, Garcia M, et al. Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The STRENGTH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(22):2268-2280. PMID: 33190147
  50. Zhang Z, He S. Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(3):311. PMID: 42456146
  51. Yamanouchi M, Tominaga N, Yonaha T. Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(3):311. PMID: 42456145
  52. Gencer B, Djousse L, Al-Ramady OT, Cook NR, Manson JE, Albert CM. Effect of Long-Term Marine ɷ-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Randomized Controlled Trials of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2021;144(25):1981-1990. PMID: 34612056
  53. Ahmed Jilani HB, Baig BM, Rasool A, et al. Impact of OMEGA-3 fatty acid in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2026;27(1). PMID: 42321661
  54. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11-22. PMID: 30415628
  55. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):23-32. PMID: 30415637
  56. Albert CM, Cook NR, Pester J, et al. Effect of Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Vitamin D Supplementation on Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1061-1073. PMID: 33724323
  57. Hilleman DE, Wiggins BS, Bottorff MB. Critical Differences Between Dietary Supplement and Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acids: A Narrative Review. Adv Ther. 2020;37(2):656-670. PMID: 31919792
  58. Albert BB, Derraik JG, Cameron-Smith D, et al. Fish oil supplements in New Zealand are highly oxidised and do not meet label content of n-3 PUFA. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7928. PMID: 25604397
  59. Niknam-Saeidi J, Mussnig S, Zabel A, et al. Willingness to take fish-oil supplementation among hemodialysis patients: a multicenter survey following the PISCES trial. Clin Kidney J. 2026;19(9):sfag269. PMID: 42699138
  60. Daud ZA, Tubie B, Adams J, et al. Effects of protein and omega-3 supplementation, provided during regular dialysis sessions, on nutritional and inflammatory indices in hemodialysis patients. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:187-95. PMID: 22536073
  61. Asemi Z, Soleimani A, Shakeri H, Mazroii N, Esmaillzadeh A. Effects of omega-3 fatty acid plus alpha-tocopherol supplementation on malnutrition-inflammation score, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in chronic hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1887-1895. PMID: 27554670
  62. Asemi Z, Soleimani A, Bahmani F, et al. Effect of the omega-3 fatty acid plus vitamin E supplementation on subjective global assessment score, glucose metabolism, and lipid concentrations in chronic hemodialysis patients. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(2):390-8. PMID: 26518514 Expression of concern: Mol Nutr Food Res. 2023;67(17):e2370200. PMID: 37655944
  63. An WS, Lee SM, Son YK, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on the modification of erythrocyte membrane fatty acid content including oleic acid in peritoneal dialysis patients. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2012;86(1-2):29-34. PMID: 22071008
  64. He L, Li MS, Lin M, Zhao TY, Gao P. Effect of fish oil supplement in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(2):129-39. PMID: 26558899
  65. Dezfouli M, Moeinzadeh F, Taheri S, Feizi A. The Effect of Omega-3 Supplementation on Serum Levels of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Albumin in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ren Nutr. 2020;30(3):182-188. PMID: 31420233
  66. Xu T, Sun Y, Sun W, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on serum lipids and vascular inflammation in patients with end-stage renal disease: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39346. PMID: 28008943
  67. Saifullah A, Watkins BA, Saha C, Li Y, Moe SM, Friedman AN. Oral fish oil supplementation raises blood omega-3 levels and lowers C-reactive protein in haemodialysis patients--a pilot study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(12):3561-7. PMID: 17623719
  68. Kooshki A, Taleban FA, Tabibi H, Hedayati M. Effects of marine omega-3 fatty acids on serum systemic and vascular inflammation markers and oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;58(3):197-202. PMID: 21757893
  69. Gharekhani A, Khatami MR, Dashti-Khavidaki S, et al. Effects of oral supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids on nutritional state and inflammatory markers in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2014;24(3):177-85. PMID: 24613294
  70. Hung AM, Booker C, Ellis CD, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids inhibit the up-regulation of endothelial chemokines in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(2):266-74. PMID: 25204316
  71. Deger SM, Hung AM, Ellis CD, et al. High Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acid Administration and Skeletal Muscle Protein Turnover in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(7):1227-1235. PMID: 27281699
  72. Moeinzadeh F, Shahidi S, Mortazavi M, et al. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Serum Biomarkers, Inflammatory Agents, and Quality of Life of Patients on Hemodialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2016;10(6):381-387. PMID: 27903997
  73. Valle Flores JA, Fariño Cortéz JE, Mayner Tresol GA, Perozo Romero J, Blasco Carlos M, Nestares T. Oral supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids and inflammation markers in patients with chronic kidney disease in hemodialysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(8):805-811. PMID: 31935118
  74. Zhang C, Ge C, Wang J, Sun D. Effects of fish oil during hemodialysis on nutritional status and quality of life: a randomized double-blinded trial. Food Nutr Res. 2020;64. PMID: 32821255
  75. Zakaria H, Mostafa TM, El-Azab GA, Ah Sayed-Ahmed N. Fish oil plus wheat germ oil have no prominent effect on homocysteine levels and nutritional indices in hemodialysis patients. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2021;91(1-2):56-62. PMID: 31433269
  76. Abbas Torki S, Roumi Z, Tahavorgar A, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on muscle mass, fat mass, and visceral fat of hemodialysis patients; A randomized clinical trial. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2024;35(6):347-352. PMID: 39533425
  77. Shafaei Kachaei H, Abbasi Mobarakrh K, Azaryan F, et al. Modulation of Inflammatory Indices by Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation in Hemodialysis: A Clinical Trial Approach. Clin Transl Sci. 2026;19(5):e70531. PMID: 42045798
  78. Perunicic-Pekovic GB, Rasic ZR, Pljesa SI, et al. Effect of n-3 fatty acids on nutritional status and inflammatory markers in haemodialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007;12(4):331-6. PMID: 17635746
  79. de Lima K, Mazur CE, Vicente Cavagnari MA, Castilho AJ, Schiessel DL. Omega-3 supplementation effects on cardiovascular risk and inflammatory profile in chronic kidney disease patients in hemodialysis treatment: An intervention study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023;58:144-151. PMID: 38056999
  80. Fatima K, Mahmood A, Sayeed FZ, et al. Effectiveness of fish oil in controlling inflammation in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2024;12:20503121241275467. PMID: 39286404
  81. Blair C, Slee A, McKeaveney C, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects and safety of omega-3 fatty acids in haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2026;72:102957. PMID: 41692069
  82. Lemos JR, Alencastro MG, Konrath AV, Cargnin M, Manfro RC. Flaxseed oil supplementation decreases C-reactive protein levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Nutr Res. 2012;32(12):921-7. PMID: 23244537
  83. Mirfatahi M, Tabibi H, Nasrollahi A, Hedayati M, Taghizadeh M. Effect of flaxseed oil on serum systemic and vascular inflammation markers and oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(8):1335-1341. PMID: 27115157
  84. Tabrizi R, Azizi Z, Bazmi S, et al. The impact of flaxseed oil on lipid profiles, weight loss, and inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Apher Dial. 2024;28(4):534-546. PMID: 38726572

Also in the Maintenance Hemodialysis module

Part of the Maintenance Hemodialysis mastery module. Module index.