N4 — UF Rate and Treatment Time FRONT
Front · at the chair
When: setting the UF goal at the start of every treatment.
Do this
- UF goal = weight above target + rinse-back and saline + intake during treatment (per unit practice).
- UF rate (mL/kg/h) = UF goal (mL) ÷ hours ÷ target weight (kg).
- Ceiling: 13 mL/kg/h. It is a ceiling, not a goal — lower is better; below 10 when possible [1].
- Heart failure: aim for 10 mL/kg/h or less [2].
- Patients over 80 kg: also keep the absolute rate at or below about 1,000 mL/h [3].
- If the goal won’t fit under the ceiling, extend time per your unit protocol’s standing order, using the table.
Most fluid that fits at 13 mL/kg/h, capped at 1,000 mL/h [1,3]:
| Target weight | 4 h | 4.5 h | 5 h |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 kg | 2.6 L | 2.9 L | 3.2 L |
| 60 kg | 3.1 L | 3.5 L | 3.9 L |
| 70 kg | 3.6 L | 4.1 L | 4.5 L |
| 80 kg or more | 4.0 L (cap) | 4.5 L (cap) | 5.0 L (cap) |
Call the nephrologist when
- The fluid won’t fit even with the extension your protocol allows — an extra session may be needed.
- The UF rate exceeded 13 mL/kg/h, or about 1,000 mL/h in a patient over 80 kg, in any session where time could not be extended [1,3].
- The patient refuses extra time.
- High potassium or a missed treatment accompanies the fluid gain — this needs full dialysis, not UF alone.
- The gain after the long weekend is repeatedly the problem [5].
Don’t
- Don’t raise the UF rate to “catch up” on the target in the same time.
- Don’t treat 13 mL/kg/h as a goal to reach.
- Don’t use isolated UF when potassium or clearance is the issue.
- Don’t use sodium profiling to push more fluid off [6].
N4 — UF Rate and Treatment Time BACK
Back · why, and the evidence
Why
- Mortality rose about 3% for each 1 mL/kg/h of UF rate, starting below 10 [1]. Above 13 versus 10 or less: HR 1.59 in the HEMO cohort [2].
- Heart failure patients showed excess risk even at 10–13 mL/kg/h [2].
- At 13 mL/kg/h, risk was much higher for a 100-kg patient than a 60-kg patient; above 1,000 mL/h, risk was high regardless of size [3].
- Each extra 30 minutes of treatment time was associated with about 6% lower mortality [4]; the long weekend gap carries the most heart failure and arrhythmia admissions [5].
- Routine sodium profiling was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.36) [6].
Go deeper
References
- Assimon MM, et al. Ultrafiltration rate and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:911-922. PubMed 27575009
- Flythe JE, et al. Rapid fluid removal during dialysis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Kidney Int. 2011;79:250-257. PubMed 20927040
- Raimann JG, et al. Ultrafiltration rate thresholds associated with increased mortality risk in hemodialysis, unscaled or scaled to body size. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7:1585-1593. PubMed 35812299
- Tentori F, et al. Longer dialysis session length is associated with better intermediate outcomes and survival (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:4180-4188. PubMed 22431708
- Foley RN, et al. Long interdialytic interval and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1099-1107. PubMed 21992122
- Dasgupta I, et al. Associations between hemodialysis facility practices to manage fluid volume and intradialytic hypotension and patient outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:385-393. PubMed 30723164
Reviewed by Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP · v1.0 draft 2026-09-26. For education; the physician’s written order and the unit protocol always govern.