Skip to content
Education Use Only
For educational use only — The physician’s written order and the unit protocol always govern
Medical Associates  ·  Department of Nephrology ← Nursing cards  ·  Maintenance Hemodialysis  ·  urinenephrology.org
Dialysis Nursing Reference Card  ·  Maintenance Hemodialysis

N21 — Vascular Access Choices in Older Adults

Access planning, failed maturation, repeated procedures, or a change in function or goals.
Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP Updated September 2026 Prints on one sheet, front and back
N21 — Vascular Access Choices in Older Adults FRONT
Front · at the chair

When: Access planning, failed maturation, repeated procedures, or a change in function or goals.

Do this

  1. Ask what matters most: time at home, independence, comfort, needle concerns, and willingness to undergo procedures. Record the patient's words [1].
  2. Bring function, frailty, mobility, cognition, support needs, heart failure, and recent admissions to the review. Age alone does not describe these risks [2,3].
  3. Document the access history: catheter use, failed fistulas, infections, interventions, and recovery burden. Ask the team to explain expected time to use and likely further procedures.
  4. Request a shared ESKD Life-Plan with the patient, nephrologist, access team, and chosen support person. Record the agreed option, backup plan, and review date [1].

Call / escalate

  • Fever or rigors with a catheter, absent thrill, a cold painful or weak hand, or uncontrolled access bleeding: follow the urgent access/emergency pathway.
  • Repeated failed procedures, worsening frailty or heart failure, or a patient who questions the treatment burden: request a renewed access and goals discussion.

Don't

  • Do not use an age cutoff or a blanket 'fistula first' rule to choose access. Do not assume a catheter is risk-free or automatically best for an older adult.
  • Do not promise that a fistula will mature. Cannulation, access changes, and catheter removal require the team's documented assessment and orders.
N21 — Vascular Access Choices in Older Adults BACK
Back · why, and the evidence

Compare the options

  • Fistula: a usable AVF can offer durable access with lower infection risk than a catheter, but maturation can fail and bridging catheter time or additional procedures may be substantial [1,2].
  • Graft: may become usable sooner than a fistula, depending on graft type and the team's assessment; infection, thrombosis, and repeat interventions remain tradeoffs [1,2].
  • Tunneled catheter: immediately usable and avoids repeated needle insertion, but carries bloodstream-infection, dysfunction, and central-vein risks. It can fit selected goals after an informed team discussion [1,2].
  • The ACCESS HD pilot randomized only 67 patients and primarily tested feasibility. It underscores strong patient preferences; it does not establish catheter superiority or equivalence [4].

Bring this to the review

Patient priority; function/frailty and support; cardiac history; access and procedure history; current problems; questions about time to benefit and burden; agreed option, backup, and follow-up owner.

Go deeper

References

  1. KDOQI 2019 Vascular Access guideline. PMID: 32778223
  2. Hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly: getting it right. PMID: 30606427
  3. Frailty in vascular access planning. PMID: 33522351
  4. ACCESS HD pilot randomized trial, 2026. PMID: 42319856

Updated September 27, 2026. For education; the physician's written order and the unit protocol always govern.