Commit to an answer before revealing the explanation. Use the section menu to navigate; each question and answer has its own link. Five-option evidence updates ask for the most defensible direction of change; discuss a justified adjacent response.
Save and export your first responses
First choices and optional confidence stay in this browser and are not sent to the website. Opening an explanation first is recorded. Revisiting an unchanged case preserves the first response; revised cases receive a new version. Website visit analytics are separate. On a shared device, export and clear the history when finished.
Sections in this case
Question and answer links
- Q1: A 64-year-old man with type 2 diabetes has an eGFR below 60 on two tests more than three months apart (creatinine 1.8 mg · Answer
- Q2: The same man takes metformin 1,000 mg twice daily. At eGFR 39 mL/min/1.73 m², which statement is correct? · Answer
- Q3: Which drug class is NOT one of the four pillars of therapy for diabetic kidney disease? · Answer
- Q4: His picture is 12 years of type 2 diabetes, background retinopathy, UACR 900 mg/g with a bland sediment, symmetric kidne · Answer
- Q5: He is on losartan 100 mg daily, metformin 1,000 mg twice daily and atorvastatin 40 mg. eGFR 39, UACR 900 mg/g, potassium · Answer
- Q6: Creatinine has gone from 1.9 to 2.2 mg/dL (16 %) two weeks after starting empagliflozin on top of losartan. Taking the c · Answer
- Q7: Potassium 5.7 mEq/L (repeat 5.6), normal ECG, asymptomatic. He has used a potassium-chloride salt substitute for 12 days · Answer
- Q8: His wife asks about "the new kidney pill" a neighbor takes — finerenone. With potassium 5.7 mEq/L today, eGFR in the 30s · Answer
- Q9: One creatinine at Day 14 could not tell a dip from early injury. If you were thinking "the SGLT2 inhibitor has injured t · Answer
- Q10: Creatinine 2.9 mg/dL (from 2.0), potassium 5.9 mEq/L with a normal ECG, bicarbonate 20, orthostatic with a 3-kg weight l · Answer
- Q11: One week after the ED visit he has eaten and drunk normally for 48 hours, orthostasis has resolved, creatinine is 2.1 mg · Answer
Session S2 · 2026-10-27 · in-session · 37 min Anchor: Chronic kidney disease — diabetic kidney disease and the four pillars · Integrates: chronic hyperkalemia on RAAS blockade; the expected creatinine bump; metformin, finerenone and GLP-1 RA by eGFR and potassium; sick-day rules and creatinine-bump triage; CKM framing, statin and nutrition counsel One-line hook: Every drug that protects a diabetic kidney nudges creatinine up and potassium up. A new PA has to tell apart the bump that is the medicine working, the bump that is the neighbor's advice, and the day that is an ED visit.
Learning Objectives
Answers for this section: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11
- Recognize typical diabetic kidney disease (long diabetes duration, retinopathy, albuminuria with a bland sediment, slow eGFR decline) and name the findings that should make you look for another cause.
- Start the first two pillars (ARB and SGLT2 inhibitor), state the potassium (5.0 mEq/L or lower; extra monitoring at 4.8–5.0) and eGFR (25 or more) entry rules for finerenone, know that a GLP-1 receptor agonist does not wait for the potassium, and adjust metformin by eGFR.
- Interpret a creatinine rise after an ARB or SGLT2 inhibitor: accept a rise of 30 % or less, act on a rise above 30 % or a potassium of 5.5 mEq/L or more.
- Work up chronic hyperkalemia on RAAS blockade (salt substitute, NSAID, diet, trimethoprim) and apply the contributor-removal steps before reaching for a binder or stopping the ARB.
- Give a sick-day plan (SADMANS) with an individualized restart plan, and triage an outpatient creatinine bump to same-day ED versus a 48–72-hour recheck.
Warm-Up (individual commit before the case)
Answers for this section: Q1 · Q2 · Q3
Q1Where does he sit on the heat map?
A 64-year-old man with type 2 diabetes has an eGFR below 60 on two tests more than three months apart (creatinine 1.8 mg/dL, eGFR 42 mL/min/1.73 m², fourteen months ago; 1.9 mg/dL, eGFR 39, today) and a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 900 mg/g. His KDIGO category is:
G3a A2 — moderately increased risk (yellow)
G3b A3 — very high risk (red)
G3b A2 — high risk (orange)
G4 A3 — very high risk (red)
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: B
Learning point: eGFR 30–44 is G3b. UACR above 300 mg/g is A3 — "severely increased" albuminuria, the same range as the old word "macroalbuminuria." Two values more than three months apart make it chronic. On the KDIGO heat map G3b with A3 is the red cell: very high risk of progression and of cardiovascular events, and a referral trigger on its own. Why not the others: A and C put him in A2, but 900 mg/g is three times the A3 cut-off; D needs an eGFR below 30. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Q2Metformin by eGFR
The same man takes metformin 1,000 mg twice daily. At eGFR 39 mL/min/1.73 m², which statement is correct?
Reduce to 500 mg twice daily; stop below an eGFR of 30
Stop it today — it is contraindicated below an eGFR of 45
Continue 1,000 mg twice daily while eGFR stays above 30
Replace it with glyburide, which is safer at this eGFR
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: A
Learning point: Metformin is cleared by the kidney. The FDA label and KDIGO 2022 together give three eGFR bands: do not start below 45; between 30 and 45 reassess and halve the dose (KDIGO: maximum 1,000 mg a day — for him, 500 mg twice daily); stop below 30. The feared complication — metformin-associated lactic acidosis — is rare and is a disease of accumulation, so the dose is matched to clearance and the drug is held whenever clearance may fall suddenly (vomiting, dehydration, contrast with an eGFR below 30 or an AKI, surgery). Why not the others: B confuses the "do not start below 45" rule with a stop rule; C ignores the 30–45 band he is in, so he is on twice the recommended dose; D swaps a safe drug for a sulfonylurea with active renally cleared metabolites and real hypoglycemia risk in CKD. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Q3The four pillars
Which drug class is NOT one of the four pillars of therapy for diabetic kidney disease?
ACE inhibitor or ARB
SGLT2 inhibitor
GLP-1 receptor agonist
Beta-blocker
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: D
Learning point: The four pillars of diabetic kidney disease are RAAS blockade (one ACE inhibitor or ARB), an SGLT2 inhibitor, the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone, and a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Each lowers albuminuria by roughly a third through a different mechanism, which is why they stack. Beta-blockers are a pillar of heart-failure therapy, not of kidney protection — a common mix-up because "four pillars" is used in both fields. Why not the others: A, B and C are three of the four; the one missing from the list is finerenone. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Part 1 — Presentation
Answers for this section: Q4 · Q5
Day 0 — primary care clinic, scheduled visit. Mr. Dale Hinrichs is a 64-year-old retired rural mail carrier who comes in with his wife for his diabetes follow-up. He feels fine. He has had type 2 diabetes for 12 years and hypertension for 10. Last year's eye exam found mild non-proliferative ("background") diabetic retinopathy — small retinal hemorrhages and microaneurysms, no new vessels, no treatment needed yet. He has gout, two flares in the past three years, the last one eight months ago. He has never smoked and drinks two beers on a weekend. His father had diabetes and "died on dialysis." He has no urinary symptoms, no edema, no foamy urine that he has noticed, and he has never seen blood in his urine.
His creatinine has drifted up slowly: 1.7 mg/dL two years ago (eGFR 45), 1.8 fourteen months ago (eGFR 42). Nobody has yet called it chronic kidney disease out loud.
Vitals: BP 138/84 mmHg seated after 5 minutes of rest, repeated 136/84 · pulse 76 regular · afebrile · weight 96 kg · height 176 cm · BMI 31.0 kg/m².
Exam: Comfortable. No jugular venous distension. Lungs clear. Heart regular, no murmur. Abdomen soft, no bruit. No leg edema. Diminished vibration sense at both great toes; monofilament intact. Feet without ulcers.
| Drug | Dose | Route | Frequency | Indication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Losartan | 100 mg | PO | once daily | Hypertension; albuminuric diabetic kidney disease (RAAS blockade) |
| Metformin | 1,000 mg | PO | twice daily | Type 2 diabetes |
| Atorvastatin | 40 mg | PO | once daily at bedtime | Cardiovascular risk reduction (type 2 diabetes with CKD) |
No over-the-counter products or supplements at this visit. No potassium supplement. No NSAID "except for a gout flare, and that was months ago."
Today's labs (fasting, drawn before the visit; all values steady state):
| Test | Result | Reference range |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 139 mEq/L | 135–145 |
| Potassium | 4.6 mEq/L | 3.5–5.0 |
| Chloride | 104 mEq/L | 98–107 |
| Bicarbonate | 23 mEq/L | 22–29 |
| Anion gap (Na − [Cl + HCO₃]) | 12 | 8–12 |
| BUN | 27 mg/dL | 7–20 |
| Creatinine | 1.9 mg/dL | 0.7–1.3 |
| eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021, race-free) | 39 mL/min/1.73 m² | ≥60 |
| BUN:creatinine | 14:1 | 10–20:1 |
| Glucose (fasting) | 162 mg/dL | 70–99 |
| Hemoglobin A1c | 7.6 % | <5.7 |
| Calcium | 9.2 mg/dL | 8.5–10.2 |
| Phosphorus | 3.9 mg/dL | 2.5–4.5 |
| Albumin | 4.0 g/dL | 3.5–5.0 |
| Uric acid | 8.4 mg/dL | 3.5–7.2 |
| LDL cholesterol | 88 mg/dL | <100 (lower in high-risk patients) |
| Hemoglobin | 13.1 g/dL | 13.5–17.5 |
| Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) | 900 mg/g | <30 |
Urinalysis (dipstick + microscopy): specific gravity 1.015 · pH 5.5 · protein 2+ · glucose trace · blood negative · leukocyte esterase negative · nitrite negative. Microscopy: 0–2 RBC/hpf, 0–2 WBC/hpf, no casts, no crystals. A bland sediment with proteinuria.
Renal ultrasound (14 months ago, ordered for the first creatinine of 1.8): right kidney 11.2 cm, left 11.5 cm, mildly increased cortical echogenicity, no hydronephrosis, no stones, no masses.
A word on the arithmetic before the questions. The eGFR of 39 is what CKD-EPI 2021 gives for a creatinine of 1.9 in a 64-year-old man. The slope is 45 → 42 → 39 over two years, about 3 mL/min per year — a slow decline, not a rapid one (rapid is more than 5 mL/min per year). The BUN:creatinine ratio of 14:1 is what CKD looks like at steady state. The anion gap is 12, so there is no hidden acid-base story. Hemoglobin 13.1 is a whisker under the line — iron studies at the next visit; CKD anemia is the Tired Teacher's case (Case 04), not this one.
Q4Is this diabetic kidney disease?
His picture is 12 years of type 2 diabetes, background retinopathy, UACR 900 mg/g with a bland sediment, symmetric kidneys and an eGFR falling about 3 mL/min per year. Which finding, if it were present instead, would most make you look for a cause other than diabetes?
The background retinopathy on last year's eye exam
An eGFR slope of about 3 mL/min per year
Red-cell casts on urine microscopy
A UACR of 900 mg/g with a bland sediment
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: C
Learning point: Diabetes damages the glomerulus (the filter) slowly and symmetrically: protein leaks, the filter does not bleed, and the decline is measured in a few mL/min a year. Retinopathy is the same small-vessel disease seen in the one organ you can look into, so its presence supports diabetes as the cause. Red-cell casts mean red cells were inside the tubules — a glomerulonephritis, which is a different disease and a same-week referral. The other atypical features to know: no retinopathy at all after a long diabetes duration, a rapid fall in eGFR, or heavy proteinuria appearing within a few years of diagnosis. Why not the others: A supports typical DKD; B is the expected slow slope; D is exactly the diabetic pattern — heavy albuminuria with nothing else in the urine. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Pause — commit before the reveal
Q5Today's plan
He is on losartan 100 mg daily, metformin 1,000 mg twice daily and atorvastatin 40 mg. eGFR 39, UACR 900 mg/g, potassium 4.6 mEq/L, A1c 7.6 %. What is the best plan to leave the room with today?
Start empagliflozin and stop losartan so the potassium has room to rise; BMP in 2 weeks
Start empagliflozin, halve the metformin, keep losartan and the statin; BMP in 2 weeks
Start finerenone today and leave the SGLT2 inhibitor to the nephrologist; BMP in 2 weeks
Change nothing today and refer; let nephrology set the plan and the lab schedule
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: B
Learning point: He already has pillar one — a maximally dosed ARB. Pillar two is an SGLT2 inhibitor, which KDIGO 2024 recommends for type 2 diabetes with CKD down to an eGFR of 20 regardless of glucose control; empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are both 10 mg daily with no renal dose change. He is on twice the metformin his eGFR allows (Q2), so that is fixed in the same visit — 500 mg twice daily. The ARB stays: hyperkalemia is managed around RAAS blockade, not by abandoning it. A BMP at 2 weeks is the monitoring that makes the plan safe. Why not the others: A throws away the pillar with the longest history of evidence to pre-empt a problem that has not happened; C starts the third pillar before the second and hands the student's job to a specialist; D delays a drug whose benefit appears within months — the referral goes in today, but so does the empagliflozin. Course reading: Evidence for this case
What you tell him before he leaves. Mr. Hinrichs asks why he takes a cholesterol pill when "my cholesterol is fine." The honest answer is the CKM frame — cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, the 2026 guideline's name for the fact that his blood pressure, his glucose, his lipids and his kidney are one disease with shared plumbing. Type 2 diabetes plus hypertension is CKM stage 2; very-high-risk CKD (his red cell on the heat map) is a risk equivalent that moves him to stage 3. Stage 3 means he is treated as if he already had cardiovascular disease: the statin continues whatever the LDL says, the BP target is below 130/80 by the 2025 AHA/ACC guideline (KDIGO 2021 suggests a standardized systolic below 120 when tolerated — same patient, different measurement method), and the kidney drugs are also heart drugs. One problem, four dials.
He also gets three practical instructions: cut sodium to under 2 g a day; expect the empagliflozin to put sugar in his urine and to pull his kidney number down a little at first ("that is the medicine lowering the pressure inside the filter, not damage"); and a written sick-day card — if he is vomiting, has diarrhea, or cannot eat or drink for a day, he stops the empagliflozin, the losartan and the metformin and calls. The card goes in his wallet. Hold that thought.
Part 2 — Data
Answers for this section: Q6 · Q7 · Q8
Day 14 — the 2-week lab check. He feels well. He has been "really good about the salt": his neighbor, whose wife is a nurse, told him that the way to cut salt is to switch to NoSalt, so he has been using it on everything for 12 days — "the kids love it on the popcorn." Nine days ago his left big toe flared. He took what he always takes for gout, naproxen sodium 220 mg, two tablets twice a day, and it has mostly settled; he is still taking it "to be safe." Neither item is in his chart. He has not been sick, is eating and drinking normally, and has not missed a dose of anything.
Vitals: BP 128/78 mmHg · pulse 74 · weight 94.5 kg (down 1.5 kg).
| Test | Day 0 | Day 14 | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 139 | 138 mEq/L | 135–145 |
| Potassium | 4.6 | 5.7 mEq/L (repeat on a non-hemolyzed sample: 5.6) | 3.5–5.0 |
| Chloride | 104 | 105 mEq/L | 98–107 |
| Bicarbonate | 23 | 21 mEq/L | 22–29 |
| Anion gap | 12 | 12 | 8–12 |
| BUN | 27 | 31 mg/dL | 7–20 |
| Creatinine | 1.9 | 2.2 mg/dL (+0.3, a 16 % rise) | 0.7–1.3 |
| eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021) | 39 | 33 mL/min/1.73 m² — lab-printed; see note | ≥60 |
| BUN:creatinine | 14:1 | 14:1 | 10–20:1 |
| Glucose (Day 0 fasting; later random) | 162 (fasting) | 148 mg/dL | 70–99 fasting; 70–140 random |
Urinalysis (Day 14): specific gravity 1.012 · protein 2+ · glucose 3+ · blood negative. Microscopy bland.
ECG (Day 14): sinus rhythm 74/min, PR 160 ms, QRS 88 ms, normal T waves, no peaking. Read side by side with the Day 0 tracing — unchanged.
Three notes on the numbers. The 3+ glucose in the urine is the empagliflozin doing its job, not new diabetes. The lab prints an eGFR of 33 because that is what the formula returns for a creatinine of 2.2; the number is real, but it is the hemodynamic adjustment, not six lost mL/min of nephrons. And the bicarbonate slipped from 23 to 21 with the potassium rising: that pairing — mild normal-gap acidosis plus hyperkalemia in a diabetic on RAAS blockade and an NSAID — is the type 4 renal tubular acidosis pattern (too little aldosterone effect at the collecting duct). The naproxen he just added makes it worse by suppressing renin; the salt substitute simply piles potassium onto a collecting duct that cannot clear it.
Q6The creatinine
Creatinine has gone from 1.9 to 2.2 mg/dL (16 %) two weeks after starting empagliflozin on top of losartan. Taking the creatinine on its own, what does it mean and what do you do about it?
Acute kidney injury from empagliflozin — stop the empagliflozin and recheck in a week
Losartan toxicity unmasked by the new drug — halve the losartan and recheck in a week
Possible obstruction — renal ultrasound today before any drug decision is made
The expected hemodynamic dip — continue both drugs and recheck in 2–4 weeks
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: D
Learning point: An SGLT2 inhibitor leaves more sodium in the tubule, the macula densa — the sensor cells where the tubule passes back beside its own glomerulus — senses it and constricts the afferent arteriole, and the pressure inside the glomerulus falls. Less pressure means less filtration right now — an eGFR dip of about 3–5 mL/min, a creatinine rise of 10–15 % — and less scarring over years. The dip appears within days, plateaus by 4–8 weeks, and reverses if the drug is stopped. The same logic applies to an ARB (its dip is efferent dilation, up to 30 %). The rule to carry: a creatinine rise of 30 % or less that stabilizes is expected; a rise above 30 %, a rise that continues to climb, or a potassium of 5.5 mEq/L or more is the signal to stop and look — for volume depletion, an NSAID, or renal artery stenosis. His 16 % is inside the line; the recheck shows whether it settles. His potassium is not, and that is Q7. Why not the others: A mistakes a pressure change for injury and loses the pillar; B halves a drug that is doing nothing wrong — and the dip is not dose-related toxicity; C answers a question nobody asked — he has no retention symptoms, a bland urine and a recent normal ultrasound. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Pause — commit before the reveal
Q7The potassium
Potassium 5.7 mEq/L (repeat 5.6), normal ECG, asymptomatic. He has used a potassium-chloride salt substitute for 12 days and naproxen 440 mg twice daily for 9 days, on top of losartan 100 mg and new empagliflozin. What is the best plan today?
Stop the salt substitute and naproxen, keep losartan and empagliflozin with review; repeat BMP within 48–72 hours
Send him to the ED today for IV calcium gluconate and insulin with dextrose; BMP there
Stop losartan for good — he has shown he cannot tolerate an ARB; BMP in a week
Start patiromer today and let him keep using the salt substitute; BMP in a week
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: A
Learning point: Remove the new potassium-chloride salt and NSAID and reassess kidney function, potassium trend, intake and volume status. Repeat BMP within 48–72 hours; UKKA Guideline 1.2.1 recommends repeating unexpected K 5.5–5.9 within three days. A normal ECG does not establish safety or exclude severe hyperkalemia. Outpatient management here depends on clinical stability, a reliable follow-up plan and no rapid rise; worsening symptoms, kidney function or potassium require urgent reassessment. Manage correctable hyperkalemia where possible so beneficial RAAS treatment can continue. Why not the others: B is not the routine response to stable K 5.6 without ECG changes; IV calcium treats cardiac toxicity, not the potassium concentration itself. C stops a protective drug permanently before correcting new contributors. D leaves an avoidable potassium load in place; binders may be added if needed. Course reading: Evidence for this case
The gout. Naproxen is out for good — any NSAID in a man with eGFR in the 30s on an ARB is the "triple whammy" waiting for its third partner (a diuretic or a stomach bug). For the next flare he gets colchicine at a dose reduced for his eGFR or a short prednisone taper, and the clinic plans urate-lowering therapy once the acute problem settles. Two small gifts: losartan is mildly uricosuric (it helps the kidney excrete uric acid), and SGLT2 inhibitors lower uric acid a little too.
Q8The third and fourth pillars
His wife asks about "the new kidney pill" a neighbor takes — finerenone. With potassium 5.7 mEq/L today, eGFR in the 30s, BMI 31 and A1c 7.6 %, which statement is correct?
Start finerenone today alongside the potassium fixes — the sooner the kidney is protected, the better
Start spironolactone now instead — it is the cheaper equivalent and does the same job for the kidney
Defer finerenone until the potassium is 5.0 or lower on a recheck; start a GLP-1 receptor agonist now
Start finerenone in place of losartan, so the potassium problem solves itself and the pillar count holds
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: C
Learning point: Finerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist: it blocks aldosterone at the collecting duct, so it raises potassium by design. The label says do not start it if potassium is above 5.0; at 4.8–5.0 start with extra monitoring; eGFR must be 25 or more (10 mg daily for eGFR 25 to under 60); check potassium at 4 weeks; hold if it exceeds 5.5. Today he fails the entry rule, so the third pillar waits for the recheck. The fourth pillar does not depend on potassium: a GLP-1 receptor agonist (semaglutide 0.25 mg weekly, titrated slowly) lowers glucose, weight, cardiovascular events and — in the FLOW trial — kidney events in people like him. Start low for the nausea, and warn him that vomiting and poor intake are a sick day (Part 3). Why not the others: A ignores the potassium entry criterion the drug carries on its label; B is the wrong drug for this indication — spironolactone is a heart-failure drug, is generally avoided at eGFR below 30 or potassium above 5, and raises potassium more; D misunderstands the pillars — finerenone is added on top of a tolerated ACE inhibitor or ARB, never in place of one. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Part 3 — Course and Decisions
Answers for this section: Q9 · Q10 · Q11
Day 28 — four weeks on empagliflozin, two weeks off NoSalt and naproxen. The pre-visit BMP is back.
Q9Evidence update
Concordance-style practice. There is no expert panel behind the key, the teaching explanation. "Unchanged" means the finding does not move the hypothesis — not "I am not sure."
One creatinine at Day 14 could not tell a dip from early injury. If you were thinking "the SGLT2 inhibitor has injured the kidney," and you then learn that at Day 28, still on the drug and two weeks off the salt substitute and naproxen, the creatinine is 2.0 mg/dL and the potassium 4.9 mEq/L, this hypothesis becomes:
Much less likely
Less likely
Unchanged
More likely
Much more likely
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: A
Learning point: Improvement toward baseline while the SGLT2 inhibitor continues makes a sustained toxic injury caused by that drug less likely. It is compatible with an early hemodynamic change plus removal of NSAID and potassium-related contributors. It does not prove that no kidney injury occurred: mixed and recovering AKI remain possible. Continue follow-up using symptoms, volume status, serial kidney function and potassium. The preferred formative direction is much less likely; a justified less-likely answer is acceptable. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Day 28, in full: potassium 4.9 mEq/L, creatinine 2.0 mg/dL (eGFR 37), bicarbonate 23; BP 126/76. Semaglutide 0.25 mg subcutaneously once weekly starts today for weight and cardiovascular risk, titrated at 4-week steps; finerenone is penciled in for the next visit if the potassium is 4.8 or lower on the pre-visit draw. He is reminded of the sick-day card.
Month 3 — a phone call, then a same-day slot. His wife calls. Their grandson brought a stomach bug home; Mr. Hinrichs has had vomiting and watery diarrhea for three days, has kept down "a little broth and some crackers," and feels dizzy when he stands. He has taken all of his pills every day, "because the doctor said they protect my kidneys." He has not urinated since early morning. Nobody looked at the sick-day card.
Vitals in the clinic: seated BP 112/68 mmHg, pulse 94 · standing at 1 minute BP 92/58, pulse 112, lightheaded · temperature 37.6 °C · weight 93 kg (down 3 kg from Day 28). Dry mucous membranes, no jugular venous distension, lungs clear, abdomen soft and mildly tender diffusely, no edema.
| Test | Day 28 | Month 3 (sick) | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 139 | 135 mEq/L | 135–145 |
| Potassium | 4.9 | 5.9 mEq/L | 3.5–5.0 |
| Chloride | 105 | 103 mEq/L | 98–107 |
| Bicarbonate | 23 | 20 mEq/L | 22–29 |
| Anion gap | 11 | 12 | 8–12 |
| BUN | 26 | 58 mg/dL | 7–20 |
| Creatinine | 2.0 | 2.9 mg/dL (+45 % in weeks; +53 % above Day 0) | 0.7–1.3 |
| eGFR | 37 | not valid — creatinine is moving | — |
| BUN:creatinine | 13:1 | 20:1 | 10–20:1 |
| Glucose (random) | 150 | 128 mg/dL | 70–140 random |
Urinalysis: specific gravity 1.024 · glucose 3+ · protein 2+ · blood negative · ketones trace. Microscopy: hyaline casts, otherwise bland. ECG: sinus tachycardia 108/min, normal intervals, no T-wave peaking.
Read it in order. The creatinine is up 0.9 mg/dL (45 %) in days — AKI by the KDIGO criterion of a rise of 0.3 mg/dL or more within 48 hours. The other criterion, 1.5 times baseline (3.0 mg/dL here), is one more day of diarrhea away. The BUN rose faster than the creatinine, so the ratio climbed from 13:1 to 20:1 — the prerenal pattern, with nothing else (no steroids, no GI bleed, no protein load) to explain the urea. The urine is concentrated and bland with hyaline casts, which fits an under-perfused but intact kidney. The potassium is up because less filtration means less sodium and less flow reaching the collecting duct, so less potassium is secreted — and the ARB is still blocking what aldosterone is left. The bicarbonate is down because diarrhea loses bicarbonate and because a poorly perfused kidney retains acid. The anion gap stays 12 — this is not ketoacidosis, which matters on an SGLT2 inhibitor: euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis presents with exactly this story and a near-normal glucose, so the trace ketones earn a venous blood gas and a serum beta-hydroxybutyrate in the ED.
Pause — commit before the reveal
Q10Disposition
Creatinine 2.9 mg/dL (from 2.0), potassium 5.9 mEq/L with a normal ECG, bicarbonate 20, orthostatic with a 3-kg weight loss, poor intake for three days, no urine since morning, still taking losartan, empagliflozin, metformin and semaglutide. Where does he go?
Home: hold the sick-day drugs, oral rehydration, BMP in 48–72 hours
Same-day ED: IV fluid, monitored potassium, drugs held, DKA screen
Home: patiromer for the potassium, oral fluids, BMP in a week
Direct admission: nephrology consult to arrange urgent dialysis
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: B
Learning point: Outpatient creatinine-bump triage runs on four things: the potassium, the symptoms, the urine output and the trajectory. A 48–72-hour recheck is for the patient who is eating and drinking, has a potassium below 5.5, is making urine and whose creatinine rise is small and plausibly hemodynamic. He fails all four — potassium 5.9 and climbing, symptomatic orthostasis, oliguria, a 45 % rise in days — and he is on a drug (empagliflozin) that can turn this exact story into euglycemic ketoacidosis. Same-day means IV fluid with reassessment, a repeat potassium within hours on a monitor, calcium only if the ECG changes, a venous gas, and every SADMANS drug held. A normal ECG at 5.9 is allowed and is not reassurance about the next six hours. Why not the others: A is the right plan for the wrong patient — the K is 5.9 and he is not keeping fluid down; C treats one number slowly while the cause (volume) goes untreated; D skips the step that fixes him — prerenal AKI with a normal ECG and no uremic symptoms is treated with fluids and drug holds, and dialysis is nowhere in this picture. Course reading: Evidence for this case
What he should have done, and what the card said. SADMANS: Sulfonylureas, ACE inhibitors, Diuretics, Metformin, ARBs (and ARNI), NSAIDs, SGLT2 inhibitors — the drugs to pause during vomiting, diarrhea, fever or a day without eating and drinking; the mineralocorticoid antagonists (spironolactone, eplerenone, finerenone) are held too. Each has a mechanism: the SGLT2 inhibitor continues to dump sodium and glucose into the urine when he cannot replace them and adds ketoacidosis risk; the ARB blocks the angiotensin his kidney needs to hold filtration when volume is low; metformin accumulates as clearance falls; an NSAID takes away the afferent dilation that protects the glomerulus when perfusion is poor. The GLP-1 receptor agonist is not on the mnemonic, but a weekly injection that already makes him queasy is worth discussing before the next dose. What he should not stop: his statin, and — had he been on one — a beta-blocker. The restart rule is Q11.
Q11The restart plan
One week after the ED visit he has eaten and drunk normally for 48 hours, orthostasis has resolved, creatinine is 2.1 mg/dL and potassium 4.8 mEq/L. His medicines have been on hold. Which restart plan is best?
Restart all drugs today without reviewing the creatinine trend or documenting further laboratory follow-up
Metformin first, because glucose control is the priority; losartan and empagliflozin at the next check
Empagliflozin and metformin now at the previous doses; losartan never again — it caused the injury
Document an individualized restart after recovery; confirm stable eGFR ≥30 for metformin 500 mg twice daily and arrange follow-up BMP
Show answer and explanation · Link to this question
Correct answer: D
Learning point: There is no guideline-mandated ARB-first, SGLT2-next, metformin-last sequence. Confirm that volume depletion and AKI are resolving, review potassium and the creatinine trend, and restore indicated treatment with a written follow-up plan. The SGLT2 inhibitor requires adequate intake and no ongoing ketosis risk. Metformin requires recovered, stable kidney function with eGFR at least 30 and an appropriate reduced dose here. A staged restart can help attribute recurrent changes, but the order is individualized. Why not the others: A omits recovery assessment and monitoring. B arbitrarily prioritizes glucose control without the renal safety review. C abandons losartan permanently despite a reversible acute illness. D restores benefits while explicitly checking recovery and dosing. Course reading: Evidence for this case
Resolution and Teaching Points
Answers for this section: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11
In the ED he received 2 L of isotonic crystalloid over four hours; the potassium fell to 5.2 mEq/L with fluid alone, the venous gas and beta-hydroxybutyrate were normal, and he was discharged that night with every SADMANS drug on hold and a BMP at 48 hours (creatinine 2.5, potassium 5.0). At one week — creatinine 2.1, potassium 4.8, eating normally — losartan 100 mg was restarted. At two weeks empagliflozin came back. At three weeks the creatinine was 2.0 mg/dL (eGFR 37) on two draws, and metformin returned at 500 mg twice daily. Semaglutide resumed at 0.25 mg and was titrated to 0.5 mg a month later.
The nephrology visit that was requested on Day 0 landed in month 4. Three things happened there that a new PA should be able to do in primary care. First, the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) was run — a calculator that uses age, sex, eGFR and UACR to give two numbers: the chance of needing dialysis or a transplant within 2 years and within 5 years. Run with his steady-state eGFR of 37 and his UACR of 900 mg/g, his 4-variable result was about 6 % at 2 years and about 18 % at 5 years (North American calibration of the 4-variable equation — the calculator has two calibrations; use the North American one here). KDIGO uses a 5-year risk of 3–5 % as the nephrology-referral threshold, a 2-year risk above 10 % for multidisciplinary kidney care, and a 2-year risk above 40 % to start dialysis education and access planning. He clears the referral line comfortably — and he already qualified on the heat map alone (G3b with A3) and would also have qualified for a decline of more than 5 mL/min a year had he had one. The referral is co-management, not a hand-off. Second, the dietitian gave the counsel in plain numbers: sodium under 2 g (2,000 mg) a day without a potassium salt substitute; potassium individualized — no blanket ban on fruit and vegetables now that the level is 4.8, but no NoSalt, no "lite" salt, and labels read on reduced-sodium broths; protein about 0.8 g per kilogram a day — about 75 g on his actual weight, closer to 65 g if the dietitian uses an adjusted weight for his BMI — reassessed as the semaglutide takes weight off (a very-low-protein diet is specialist territory, not a goal); and phosphorus additives ("phos-" on an ingredient list) avoided before natural phosphorus is restricted. Third, with the potassium 4.7 on two checks, finerenone 10 mg daily was started with a potassium check at 4 weeks.
His gout has not flared since the naproxen stopped; colchicine at a reduced dose is in the cabinet for the next one, and allopurinol was started low and titrated. A new sick-day card is in his wallet. His wife has one in her purse.
Clinical Pearl — The 30 % rule has two halves The >30% creatinine threshold belongs to reassessment after starting or increasing ACEi/ARB (KDIGO 2024, 3.6.4); it is not proof that every smaller rise is harmless. SGLT2-related initial eGFR dips are commonly reversible. Review volume, NSAIDs, potassium and serial values before changing protective therapy.
Clinical Pearl — Hyperkalemia on RAAS blockade is a work-up, not a reflex Before touching the ARB, hunt for the reversible contributors: potassium-chloride salt substitutes and "lite" salt, NSAIDs, trimethoprim, potassium supplements, potassium-sparing diuretics, and uncontrolled glucose. Then the ladder: diet, loop diuretic if volume-expanded, binder (patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate). Stopping the ARB is the bottom rung.
Clinical Pearl — Metformin has three bands and one hold rule Do not start below eGFR 45; halve it (maximum 1,000 mg a day) between 30 and 45; stop below 30. Separately, hold it during any illness that threatens filtration — vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, IV iodinated contrast with AKI or eGFR <30 under the ACR approach; the FDA label and some local policies are stricter — whatever the baseline band.
Clinical Pearl — The four pillars are sequenced by potassium and indication, not by enthusiasm ARB (or ACE inhibitor) and SGLT2 inhibitor first, together or within weeks. Finerenone only when potassium is 5.0 or lower (extra monitoring at 4.8–5.0) and eGFR 25 or more. A GLP-1 receptor agonist whenever glucose, weight or cardiovascular risk calls for it — it does not wait for the potassium.
Clinical Pearl — Triage a creatinine bump on four things Triage by potassium and its trajectory, ECG, symptoms, volume, intake, urine output and reliable follow-up. Stable mild hyperkalemia may be managed with prompt outpatient remeasurement; acute illness, oliguria, hypotension or a rising potassium requires same-day assessment. IV fluid is appropriate for depletion, not for every creatinine rise.
Pitfall — Stopping the pillar for the dip Avoid reflex withdrawal for a modest stable hemodynamic dip, but do not call every creatinine rise protective. Review perfusion, concurrent illness, nephrotoxins, potassium and repeat values. Continue, reduce or temporarily hold treatment according to that assessment.
Pitfall — A sick-day card with no restart line Half the harm of sick-day rules comes from patients who stop the ARB during a stomach bug and never start it again. Every hold comes with a restart trigger (eating and drinking 24–48 hours, BMP checked) and an order (ARB, then SGLT2 inhibitor, then metformin at the eGFR-appropriate dose), written down and followed up with a lab.
Concept Links
Answers for this section: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11
Assigned reading: the explanations in this case and the question-linked course evidence guide. The objective map distinguishes tested decisions from concepts taught in explanations.
Concepts: aki-14, aki-15, aki-27, ckd-02, ckd-06, ckd-11, ckd-12, ckd-13, ckd-17, ckd-20, htn-cardiorenal-07, htn-cardiorenal-09, htn-cardiorenal-24, htn-cardiorenal-25, lytes-14, structural-23, structural-24.