Case 15: The Family Discovery

Session 5 · Classroom case · 12 questions

Andrew Bland, MD, FACP, FAAP · October 2026

Commit to an answer before revealing the explanation. Use the section menu to navigate; each question and answer has its own link. Five-option evidence updates ask for the most defensible direction of change; discuss a justified adjacent response.

Save and export your first responses

First choices and optional confidence stay in this browser and are not sent to the website. Opening an explanation first is recorded. Revisiting an unchanged case preserves the first response; revised cases receive a new version. Website visit analytics are separate. On a shared device, export and clear the history when finished.

Sections in this case
Question and answer links

Session S5 · 2026-11-03 · in-session · 37 min Anchor: Integrative review — ADPKD, cysts and incidental findings followed over fifteen years · Integrates: hematuria routing in a cystic kidney, complicated UTI in a structural kidney, imaging and the contrast rules, blood pressure, family screening, the Alport / TBMN / ADTKD contrast, and CKD referral, transplant and KRT planning One-line hook: You will meet this family in primary care: the man with blood in his urine, the brother who wants a scan tomorrow, the sister with "just a cyst." Three questions, three different answers — and the wrong one can cost an insurance policy, a week in hospital, or a kidney before dialysis.

Learning Objectives

Answers for this section: W1 · W2 · W3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11 · Q12

  1. Route flank pain with gross hematuria in a polycystic kidney among a cyst bleed, a stone and an infection, and choose the imaging that answers each question.
  2. Apply the age-based ultrasound criteria for ADPKD to a patient and two relatives, and counsel an at-risk adult before screening, including when genetic testing replaces imaging.
  3. Plan first-line care for new ADPKD: analgesia without NSAIDs, the first blood pressure drug and its monitoring, and aneurysm screening — for whom, and with which test.
  4. Manage a febrile polycystic kidney as a complicated urinary infection, and interpret a culture result in light of where the infection sits.
  5. Prepare a patient for late CKD: transplant timing, a related living donor, KRT education, vein preservation and the contrast rules by eGFR (the nephrology referral triggers are discussed, not tested).

Warm-Up (individual commit before the case)

Answers for this section: W1 · W2 · W3

Three readiness items from Sessions 3 and 4. Cards up, one sentence each, no discussion.

W1Whose hematuria is it?

A 44-year-old woman who smokes has 2+ blood on two dipsticks a month apart. Microscopy: 12 RBC/hpf, uniform round cells (isomorphic), no casts. Protein negative. Creatinine 0.8 mg/dL, BP 118/74, no dysuria, urine culture negative. Where does she go?

A.

Nephrology — two positive dipsticks mean persistent hematuria; send serologies and plan a biopsy

B.

Urology — isomorphic cells, no protein, no casts: AUA/SUFU risk-based imaging and cystoscopy

C.

No referral yet — repeat the urinalysis in 12 months and refer only if it is still positive

D.

Treat for a urinary infection, then repeat the urinalysis once the antibiotic course is done

· Link to this question

Correct answer: B

Learning point: The sediment sorts hematuria onto two roads. Red cells that crossed a damaged glomerulus come out misshapen (dysmorphic), often in casts and with protein: nephrology. Uniform cells without casts or substantial protein favor a nonglomerular source but do not prove it: urology, where the AUA/SUFU guideline sets how hard to look from age, sex, smoking and the amount of blood. Microhematuria is at least 3 RBC/hpf on microscopy, not a dipstick reading; she has 12. Why not the others: A — the supplied pattern favors a nonglomerular source, although morphology is not definitive. C — confirmed hematuria in a smoker requires risk-based evaluation, not a year of delay. D — the findings do not establish a urinary infection; a negative culture reduces support but is not an absolute exclusion test. If bleeding is attributed to infection, document its resolution after treatment. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for W1

Back to W1 · All answers in this case

W2The test for the stone

A 29-year-old man has sudden severe left flank pain radiating to the groin, one episode of vomiting, dipstick blood 3+, no fever and a normal creatinine. Which imaging first?

A.

CT urography with IV contrast — it shows the stones and the whole collecting system

B.

Plain abdominal X-ray (KUB) — quick, cheap and low-dose for a first stone

C.

Non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis, low-dose stone protocol

D.

MRI of the abdomen and pelvis — no radiation in a 29-year-old man

· Link to this question

Correct answer: C

Learning point: Non-contrast CT is the reference test for a suspected stone: highly accurate, it shows the uric-acid stones a plain film misses and gives size, position and the degree of obstruction (hydronephrosis — a kidney swollen because urine cannot drain), and it finds the other diagnosis when it is not a stone. A stone is visible without contrast, so none is given. Ultrasound comes first in pregnancy and in children; it shows hydronephrosis well but misses many ureteral stones. Why not the others: A adds contrast that changes nothing tonight; B misses 20–50 % of stones and is for following a known radiopaque one; D is slow, costly and poor at showing calcium. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for W2

Back to W2 · All answers in this case

W3The scan she needs tonight

A 72-year-old woman with stable CKD (eGFR 26 mL/min/1.73 m², not on dialysis) has suspected bowel ischemia, and the surgeon wants a CT with IV contrast tonight. What is the kidney plan?

A.

Cancel the CT and get an ultrasound — iodinated contrast is off-limits below eGFR 30

B.

Give the contrast with no kidney precautions — IV contrast risk is negligible at any eGFR

C.

Do the CT tonight, with isotonic IV fluid around it if her volume status allows

D.

Do the CT after N-acetylcysteine and IV sodium bicarbonate to protect her kidneys

· Link to this question

Correct answer: C

Learning point: The 2020 ACR–NKF consensus treats the kidney risk of IV contrast as very low above an eGFR of 30, and names eGFR below 30, or AKI, as the group in whom isotonic fluid around the scan is reasonable. Even in that group a scan that changes management is done — a missed bowel infarction is far more dangerous than a creatinine bump. Why not the others: A cancels a scan that decides survival; B applies the above-30 rule to the one group it does not cover; D uses the two agents the PRESERVE trial tested and found no benefit from. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for W3

Back to W3 · All answers in this case

Part 1 — Presentation

Answers for this section: Q4 · Q5 · Q6

Mr. K. is 34. He teaches high-school chemistry and coaches wrestling, and he has not seen a doctor since a college sports physical. He walks into urgent care on a Saturday morning with two days of right flank pain — a dull ache at first, then waves of sharper pain last evening — and this morning his urine was "the color of cranberry juice." No fever, chills, burning or trouble passing urine. He vomited once last night. He took ibuprofen 600 mg three times yesterday from the bottle in the wrestling room. No previous kidney stones. He does not smoke; he drinks two or three beers on a weekend.

Ask about the family and the case changes shape. His father started dialysis at 55 and died at 58 of "a bleed in his brain" — a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, a weak spot in a brain artery that balloons and bursts. His father's mother "had kidney trouble" and died in her sixties. His mother is healthy. He has a sister, 38, and a brother, 19, a college sophomore. Nobody told him what his father's kidney disease was called, or suggested he be checked. A work health fair two years ago said his pressure "ran a little high."

Hematuria is blood in the urine — gross when you can see it, microscopic when only the lab can. A cyst is a fluid-filled sac with a thin wall. In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), hundreds of cysts grow for decades, stretch the kidneys to several times their normal size and squeeze the working tissue; many patients reach kidney failure in middle age. Autosomal dominant means one faulty copy of the gene is enough: each child of an affected parent has a 50 % chance of inheriting it, and the disease does not skip a generation, even when the diagnosis does.

Vitals: BP 146/92 seated, repeated after five minutes 144/90 · Pulse 84 · T 37.1 °C · Respiratory rate 16 · Weight 92 kg · Height 183 cm (BMI 27.5).

Exam: Uncomfortable but not toxic. Mild right costovertebral-angle tenderness, none on the left. Abdomen soft; both flanks are full and both kidneys are palpable — a kidney you can feel in a man this size is an enlarged kidney. No bruit. Heart, lungs and neurological exam normal; no edema, no headache.

The urgent-care clinician orders a renal ultrasound that afternoon for the palpable kidneys. Renal ultrasound: right kidney 16.8 cm, left 16.2 cm (normal length 9–13 cm); more than ten cysts in each kidney, the largest 4.1 cm at the right upper pole; no hydronephrosis; bladder normal. Liver: four simple cysts, the largest 2.5 cm.

Drug Dose Route Frequency Indication
Ibuprofen (OTC) 600 mg PO three doses yesterday Flank pain — self-directed
Multivitamin 1 tablet PO daily —

No prescription medications. No allergies.

Does he have ADPKD? The age-based ultrasound criteria (Pei unified criteria, 2009) Simple cysts become more common with age, so the number that makes the diagnosis in someone with an affected parent or sibling depends on age:

Age Diagnostic Excludes
15–39 ≥3 cysts in total (one or both kidneys) — (a negative scan is not final before 40)
40–59 ≥2 cysts in each kidney fewer than 2 cysts in total
≥60 ≥4 cysts in each kidney fewer than 2 cysts in total

Mr. K. is 34 with an affected father and more than twenty cysts: he meets the criteria many times over.

Pause — commit before the reveal

Q4The scan report

Ultrasound shows two enlarged polycystic kidneys and no hydronephrosis. Mr. K. still has colicky right flank pain and gross hematuria, and he is afebrile. What is the right next step today?

A.

Accept the cysts as the cause; treat the pain and arrange follow-up in clinic

B.

CT urography with IV contrast to map the collecting system and the cysts together

C.

Cystoscopy today, since visible blood in a man is a bladder question first

D.

Non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis, stone protocol, before he goes home

· Link to this question

Correct answer: D

Learning point: In a polycystic kidney, flank pain with blood has three causes, sorted in two moves. Fever and systemic illness raise concern for infection; being afebrile lowers that concern but cannot alone exclude it. The non-contrast CT separates a stone from bleeding into a cyst: about one in five people with ADPKD forms stones, colicky waves are a stone until proven otherwise, and ultrasound misses many ureteral stones. The same scan shows whether a cyst is denser than water — the look of fresh blood. Why not the others: A pins the blood on the cysts without excluding an obstructing stone — the commonest wrong move in this case; B gives contrast for a question the plain scan answers (safe at his kidney function, but not needed); C is for isomorphic hematuria that persists once stone and cyst have been excluded. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q4

Back to Q4 · All answers in this case

Q5The sentence in the family history that is about him

His father died of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Mr. K. has no headache and a normal neurological exam. What does this part of the history change for him?

A.

A screening brain MRA now, repeated every 5–10 years while it stays negative

B.

A standard brain MRI with gadolinium, which shows the brain and its vessels together

C.

A non-contrast head CT today, which shows blood and large aneurysms quickly

D.

Nothing yet — aneurysm screening in ADPKD is for headaches or a known aneurysm

· Link to this question

Correct answer: A

Learning point: His first-degree family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage is an indication to discuss intracranial aneurysm screening, provided he would be eligible for treatment and has a reasonable life expectancy. Non-contrast time-of-flight MRA is the preferred screening study. A negative study may be repeated in 5–10 years according to individual risk and preferences. A thunderclap headache is an emergency requiring diagnostic evaluation, not a routine screening indication. Why not the others: B images brain tissue rather than the arteries and adds gadolinium for nothing; C is the test for a sudden severe headache, not for screening a well man; D misses the indication he carries — family history is first on the list. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q5

Back to Q5 · All answers in this case

Q6The pressure, and the bottle in the wrestling room

BP 146/92 and 144/90 today, "a little high" two years ago, three doses of ibuprofen yesterday, two polycystic kidneys. What is the right plan for his blood pressure?

A.

Start amlodipine 5 mg today — calcium channel blockers are kidney-safe and need no labs

B.

Stop the ibuprofen, confirm with home readings, then lisinopril with a BMP at 1–2 weeks

C.

Treat the pain only — pain raises the pressure; recheck at a routine visit in six months

D.

Start lisinopril and losartan together — two RAAS blockers protect cystic kidneys better

· Link to this question

Correct answer: B

Learning point: Hypertension affects 50–70 % of people with ADPKD, often in their thirties and before kidney function falls, because growing cysts squeeze the kidney's blood supply and switch on renin. An ACE inhibitor (or ARB) is first-line: check creatinine and potassium at 1–2 weeks and accept a rise of up to 30 %. Aim below 130/80 (2025 AHA/ACC); the lower HALT-PKD and KDIGO targets are the nephrologist's call. The NSAID goes for good — it raises the pressure and threatens a kidney already under strain. Why not the others: A picks a sensible add-on as the first drug and skips the labs; C calls hypertension "pain" in a man with an earlier high reading and an affected father, and six months is too long; D is dual RAAS blockade — more hyperkalemia and AKI, and HALT-PKD found no added benefit. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q6

Back to Q6 · All answers in this case

Part 2 — Data

Answers for this section: Q7 · Q8 · Q9

The non-contrast CT is done that evening; the blood and urine tests come back that night and the urine culture two days later. Walk the tables in order and ask what each result excludes before asking what it proves.

Serum chemistry and blood count (urgent care, age 34)

Test Result Reference range
Sodium 140 mEq/L 135–145
Potassium 4.2 mEq/L 3.5–5.0
Chloride 103 mEq/L 98–107
Bicarbonate 25 mEq/L 22–28
Anion gap (Na − [Cl + HCO₃]) 140 − (103 + 25) = 12 8–12 (this lab)
BUN 14 mg/dL 7–20
Creatinine 1.12 mg/dL 0.7–1.3
BUN:creatinine 12.5:1 —
eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021, 34-year-old man) 88 mL/min/1.73 m² ≥90 (G2 if confirmed beyond 3 months)
Glucose 92 mg/dL 70–99
Calcium 9.4 mg/dL 8.5–10.5
Albumin 4.3 g/dL 3.5–5.0
WBC 7.9 ×10³/µL 4.0–11.0
Hemoglobin 15.1 g/dL 13.5–17.5
Platelets 230 ×10³/µL 150–400
Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 45 mg/g — not interpretable with gross hematuria; repeat when the urine is clear <30

Urinalysis

Component Result Reference
Color / clarity red-brown; supernatant clear after spinning (the color is in the cells) —
Specific gravity 1.015 1.005–1.030
pH 6.0 4.5–8.0
Blood (heme) 3+ negative
Protein 1+ (blood contributes) negative
Glucose / ketones negative / negative negative
Leukocyte esterase / nitrite negative / negative negative
Microscopy RBC too numerous to count, uniform round shape (isomorphic), no dysmorphic forms, no RBC casts; WBC 0–2/hpf; no bacteria; no crystals —
Urine culture no growth at 48 h —

Non-contrast CT, abdomen and pelvis (stone protocol): Both kidneys markedly enlarged (right 17.0 cm, left 16.4 cm) and replaced by innumerable cysts, more than ten in each kidney. No calculus in either kidney, either ureter or the bladder. No hydronephrosis. The 4.1-cm right upper-pole cyst is denser than the others — the appearance of recent bleeding into the cyst. No perinephric fluid or stranding. Four hepatic cysts, largest 2.5 cm.

What the data support. No stone or hydronephrosis is seen, and the clinical course, stable hemoglobin and dense cyst favor cyst hemorrhage. The nonglomerular urine pattern and lack of systemic infection signs make competing diagnoses less likely; they do not prove their absence. Confirm that bleeding resolves, and reassess persistent, atypical or recurrent prolonged symptoms.

Q7Bleeding into a cyst: what you do, and what you check later

No stone, no hydronephrosis, a dense 4.1-cm cyst, hemoglobin 15.1, afebrile, pain 4/10 on acetaminophen. What is the best plan for the hematuria?

A.

Fluids, acetaminophen, no NSAIDs; recheck the urinalysis in 2–4 weeks to see it clear

B.

CT with IV contrast today to give the dense cyst a Bosniak category before he goes home

C.

Cystoscopy this week to exclude a bladder or prostate source of the visible blood

D.

Seven days of ciprofloxacin — a dense cyst is treated as infected until proven otherwise

· Link to this question

Correct answer: A

Learning point: Acute flank pain, gross hematuria and a stable hemoglobin is the classic picture of a cyst bleed, managed conservatively; the urine usually clears within days to a couple of weeks. The Session 3 rule rides along: blood is never attributed to a cause until it is shown to clear, so the 2–4-week urinalysis is part of the plan, and isomorphic hematuria that persists goes to urology. And no NSAIDs again — acetaminophen is his analgesic. Why not the others: B asks Bosniak's cancer question of the wrong patient — a typical resolving cyst bleed can be managed conservatively, but atypical imaging, recurrent prolonged bleeding or failure to clear still needs evaluation for a mass or another source; C is the step only if the blood does not clear; D treats an infection he does not have — no fever, a normal white count, and a cyst full of blood rather than pus. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q7

Back to Q7 · All answers in this case

The plan from urgent care. Acetaminophen, fluids, no NSAIDs. A home blood-pressure cuff: the week's average came back 142/90, so lisinopril 10 mg daily started on day 6; the BMP at two weeks showed creatinine 1.20 (a 7 % rise — expected) and potassium 4.4. Nephrology referral within a month — polycystic kidneys are "abnormal kidney imaging," a referral trigger on their own. Brain MRA for the family history. Repeat UACR once the urine is clear. A written summary for his sister and brother.

Then the family calls. His brother, 19, phones Monday: he has read about the disease all weekend and wants "the scan tomorrow." His sister, 38, had an abdominal ultrasound for gallstones last month; the report mentions "a 2.0-cm simple cyst, left kidney: thin wall, no septations, anechoic (fluid-dark, no internal echoes)." Her creatinine was 0.8 mg/dL (eGFR 97 for a 38-year-old woman), blood pressure 116/72, urinalysis bland. She wants to know whether she has what her brother has.

Pause — commit before the reveal

Q8The brother who wants a scan tomorrow

A healthy 19-year-old with no symptoms and a normal blood pressure, whose father died of ADPKD and whose brother has just been diagnosed, asks you to order a renal ultrasound tomorrow. What is the right response?

A.

Order the ultrasound for tomorrow; the counseling can follow once the result is back

B.

Decline for now — ultrasound is unreliable before 30, so screening should wait until then

C.

Counsel first — 50 % risk, what a positive or negative scan means, insurance — then scan

D.

Send a PKD gene panel instead — it is definitive and spares him years of repeat scans

· Link to this question

Correct answer: C

Learning point: Screening an at-risk adult is a conversation before it is a scan, and at 19 the choice is his. He needs the facts first: a 50 % prior risk; a positive scan that brings lifelong blood-pressure care but also a diagnosis in his record, with consequences for life and disability insurance; and a negative scan that is reassuring but provisional, because cysts accumulate with age — it is repeated every few years, and the reassurance from a negative ultrasound depends on age, familial genotype and the purpose of testing; a negative study at 19 cannot definitively clear a potential future donor. Ultrasound is the right first test: cheap, no radiation, no contrast. Why not the others: A gets the order right and the sequence wrong — the result lands in his chart before he knows what it means; B invents a rule — screening is offered from 18, and at 19 three or more cysts is diagnostic; D reverses the roles — genetic testing is for equivocal imaging, a potential donor, family planning or an atypical picture. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q8

Back to Q8 · All answers in this case

Q9The sister with "just a cyst"

A 38-year-old woman with an affected father and brother has a single 2.0-cm thin-walled anechoic cyst in the left kidney on an ultrasound done for gallstones. Creatinine 0.8, BP 116/72, urine bland. What do you tell her?

A.

Reassure her about the cyst, and tell her she does not have ADPKD — one cyst is not three

B.

Refer her to urology for a contrast CT — any kidney cyst in an ADPKD family needs one

C.

Order genetic testing before discussing either the cyst or her risk of the disease

D.

The cyst needs no follow-up; ADPKD is neither made nor excluded — rescan at 40 or test

· Link to this question

Correct answer: D

Learning point: She asked one question and is owed two answers. Is the cyst dangerous? No: a thin wall, no septa and nothing inside make a simple cyst — the ultrasound equivalent of Bosniak I — and it needs no follow-up (IIF lesions are re-imaged; III and IV go to urology). Does she have her father's disease? A different rule: at 15–39 the diagnosis needs three cysts, and fewer than two cysts at 40 or older can exclude typical familial PKD1/PKD2 disease under the established age-specific criteria, so at 38 with one cyst she is neither diagnosed nor cleared. A scan at 40 can clear her; genetic testing is faster if she cannot wait. Why not the others: A gives the right cyst answer and the wrong family answer — one cyst at 38 does not settle the family-specific exclusion question; B treats a simple cyst as a mass needing contrast; C withholds reassurance she is owed about the cyst and makes testing mandatory when a scan at 40 may settle it. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q9

Back to Q9 · All answers in this case

Part 3 — Course and Decisions

Answers for this section: Q10 · Q11 · Q12

Seven years pass. Nephrology took him on at 34. The brain MRA was negative; a repeat is booked for 44. On lisinopril 40 mg his home readings run 124–128 over 76–80. The UACR, repeated with clear urine, was 38 mg/g and has drifted to 90. His creatinine has crept from 1.12 to 1.30: eGFR 71 at 41, a loss of about 2.4 mL/min a year. His brother's ultrasound was negative at 19 and again at 24. His sister's scan at 40 still showed the one cyst, supporting exclusion of typical familial PKD1/PKD2 disease after genetic counseling; unusual familial variants or discordant findings would require a different evaluation. Mr. K. has had two more cyst bleeds, both managed at home and both cleared on the follow-up urinalysis.

Age 41, a Tuesday night in February. He arrives in the emergency department with eighteen hours of fever to 39.0 °C, rigors, right flank pain unlike his bleeds — constant, deep, worse when the car hit a pothole — and pink urine. No dysuria, urethral discharge, new partner, catheter or recent procedure. No antibiotic. He looks ill.

Vitals: BP 112/70 · Pulse 108 · T 39.0 °C · Respiratory rate 20 · SpO₂ 97 % on room air · Weight 94 kg.

Exam: Flushed, shivering, oriented. The right kidney, always palpable, is now exquisitely tender to percussion; the left flank is full but non-tender. Abdomen otherwise soft. No rash, joint swelling or murmur. Prostate normal and non-tender.

Drug Dose Route Frequency Indication
Lisinopril 40 mg PO daily Hypertension; albuminuria; ADPKD kidney protection
Acetaminophen 1,000 mg PO every 8 h as needed Flank pain (NSAIDs avoided)

Labs (emergency department, age 41)

Test Result Reference range
Sodium 136 mEq/L 135–145
Potassium 4.3 mEq/L 3.5–5.0
Chloride 101 mEq/L 98–107
Bicarbonate 23 mEq/L 22–28
Anion gap 136 − (101 + 23) = 12 8–12 (this lab)
BUN 18 mg/dL 7–20
Creatinine 1.30 mg/dL (his baseline last month 1.30) 0.7–1.3
BUN:creatinine 13.8:1 —
eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021, 41-year-old man) 71 mL/min/1.73 m² — stable, so valid ≥60
Glucose 108 mg/dL 70–99
Lactate 1.4 mmol/L 0.5–2.0
WBC 15.8 ×10³/µL, 86 % neutrophils 4.0–11.0
Hemoglobin 14.2 g/dL 13.5–17.5
Platelets 245 ×10³/µL 150–400
C-reactive protein 182 mg/L <10

Urinalysis: SG 1.018; pH 6.0; blood 2+; protein trace; leukocyte esterase trace; nitrite negative. Microscopy: RBC 20–30/hpf, isomorphic; WBC 5–10/hpf; no casts; no bacteria seen.

Non-contrast CT abdomen and pelvis (stone protocol), 22:40: Kidneys 19.5 cm and 20.2 cm, innumerable cysts. No calculus. No hydronephrosis. No perinephric collection or gas. Several right-sided cysts are denser than water, as on prior studies. Radiologist's comment: no single cyst can be labeled infected on a non-contrast study.

Reading the room. The three-way differential from age 34 is back with the thermometer pointing the other way — pyelonephritis (infection of the collecting system), an infected cyst, or an infected stone — and the CT has removed the stone and the obstruction.

Pause — commit before the reveal

Q10The febrile structural kidney, from the front door

It is 23:00 in the emergency department: a 41-year-old man with ADPKD, 39.0 °C, rigors, pulse 108, a tender right kidney, WBC 15.8, no stone or hydronephrosis on CT, leukocyte esterase trace, nitrite negative. What is the right disposition and plan?

A.

Discharge on oral ciprofloxacin for 7 days, with a clinic check and a repeat urinalysis in a week

B.

Admit; blood and urine cultures, then IV antibiotics; hold lisinopril; involve nephrology and ID

C.

Discharge on nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for 5 days — trace leukocytes point to cystitis

D.

Urology consult tonight to drain the largest cyst percutaneously before any antibiotic is given

· Link to this question

Correct answer: B

Learning point: A man with fever, rigors and a structurally abnormal kidney has a complicated urinary infection, and this systemically unwell, rigoring patient needs hospital assessment and inpatient treatment. Order matters: blood and urine cultures before the first dose, then an IV agent — ceftriaxone is the usual inpatient start. Ask nephrology and infectious disease on day one which drug reaches cyst fluid (the lecture page names fluoroquinolones first, TMP-SMX second), and image again if he is not better at 48–72 hours. The lisinopril is held under the Session 2 sick-day rule. Why not the others: A is outpatient pyelonephritis care for a man who needs admission; C is wrong twice — avoid nitrofurantoin for any kidney infection because it does not reach kidney tissue, and a 39 °C rigor is not cystitis; D drains before cultures or a first dose — drainage is for a cyst that fails antibiotics. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q10

Back to Q10 · All answers in this case

He is admitted. Blood cultures ×2 and a urine culture are drawn at 23:00; ceftriaxone 1 g IV follows at 23:10, and the lisinopril is held. Nephrology's plan on morning rounds: if he is still febrile at 48–72 hours, a contrast CT and a switch to a drug that reaches cyst fluid.

Hospital day 2, 48 hours in. Temperature still 38.8 °C after two doses of ceftriaxone. Repeat WBC 14.9 ×10³/µL, CRP 210 mg/L, creatinine 1.32. Urine culture: no growth at 48 hours. Blood cultures: no growth yet.

Q11Evidence update

Concordance-style practice: there is no expert panel behind this key, the teaching explanation. "Unchanged" means the finding does not move the hypothesis — not "I'm not sure."

If you were thinking infected cyst, and you then learn that the urine culture drawn before the first antibiotic dose is negative at 48 hours while the fever persists, this hypothesis becomes:

A.

Much less likely

B.

Less likely

C.

Unchanged

D.

More likely

E.

Much more likely

· Link to this question

Correct answer: D

Formative evidence update: The letter is a teaching anchor. Accept a justified adjacent response; this is not an expert-panel-validated score. Learning point: Persistent fever despite initial treatment, sterile pre-antibiotic urine and the ADPKD context shift concern toward an infected cyst that may not communicate with the collecting system. A negative culture does not rule out pyelonephritis, and cyst infection and pyelonephritis can coexist. Reassess the whole patient and alternative sources, use appropriate imaging and discuss cyst-penetrating therapy with nephrology and infectious disease. This finding supports the hypothesis; it does not establish it. Why not the others: A and B give excessive exclusionary weight to a negative urine culture. C can be defended if the student notes that a closed cyst was already expected to yield a negative culture; the persistent fever and treatment response are what add concern here. D is the intended increase in likelihood. E overstates the certainty available from these findings. Keep this item formative. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q11

Back to Q11 · All answers in this case

Eight more years. The contrast CT at 72 hours — low-risk at an eGFR of 71 — showed a 5-cm right lower-pole cyst with a thick, enhancing wall: the infected one. The blood cultures stayed sterile. Six weeks of a fluoroquinolone cured it; the fever broke on day five. At 42 his nephrologist offered tolvaptan, a nephrology-prescribed vasopressin blocker that slows kidney growth in adults progressing fast, with monthly liver tests for the first 18 months. He declined: it brings constant thirst and nights up passing urine. His kidneys kept growing. His brother screened negative again at 29 and at 34.

Age 49, nephrology clinic. He feels well — some fatigue, no nausea, no itch, no metallic taste, urinating normally. BP 126/78 on two drugs. Kidneys 23.1 cm and 23.6 cm on last year's ultrasound. The eGFR that was 71 at 41 is 22: a loss of about 6 mL/min a year over eight years, faster than the 5 mL/min-per-year referral trigger on its own.

Drug Dose Route Frequency Indication
Lisinopril 40 mg PO daily Hypertension; albuminuria; kidney protection
Amlodipine 10 mg PO daily Hypertension — added at 44 when home readings exceeded 130/80
Atorvastatin 20 mg PO nightly Cardiovascular risk in CKD
Sodium bicarbonate 650 mg PO twice daily Metabolic acidosis of CKD — nephrology-started
Acetaminophen 500–1,000 mg PO every 6 h as needed Pain; NSAIDs avoided

Labs (nephrology clinic, age 49)

Test Result Reference range
Sodium 139 mEq/L 135–145
Potassium 4.9 mEq/L 3.5–5.0
Chloride 106 mEq/L 98–107
Bicarbonate 21 mEq/L 22–28
Anion gap 139 − (106 + 21) = 12 8–12 (this lab)
BUN 48 mg/dL 7–20
Creatinine 3.30 mg/dL 0.7–1.3
BUN:creatinine 14.5:1 —
eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021, 49-year-old man) 22 mL/min/1.73 m² — stable over two draws, so valid; KDIGO G4 ≥60
Glucose 96 mg/dL 70–99
Calcium 9.0 mg/dL 8.5–10.5
Phosphorus 4.6 mg/dL 2.5–4.5
Albumin 4.1 g/dL 3.5–5.0
Intact PTH 165 pg/mL 15–65
25-OH vitamin D 24 ng/mL 30–100
Uric acid 8.4 mg/dL 3.5–7.2
Hemoglobin 12.6 g/dL 13.5–17.5
UACR 320 mg/g — A3 <30
Urinalysis SG 1.010; blood trace; protein 1+; RBC 3–5/hpf; no casts —

Reading the room, again. G4 A3 is a red cell of the KDIGO grid. He has been followed since 34, so each abnormal value already has a plan.

Q12eGFR 22, and a brother on the phone again

A 49-year-old man with ADPKD, eGFR 22 and falling about 6 mL/min a year, no uremic symptoms, potassium 4.9. His 34-year-old brother — four negative ultrasounds, the last this year — asks whether he can give a kidney. What is the right plan today?

A.

Refer for transplant now; KRT education; protect his arm veins; work up the brother as donor

B.

Start tolvaptan now, since it slows ADPKD progression, and revisit transplant in a year

C.

Wait — refer for transplant once dialysis has started and he can be put on the list

D.

Order an MRI with a group I gadolinium agent to measure kidney volume before deciding anything

· Link to this question

Correct answer: A

Learning point: Transplant referral belongs in G4, no later than an eGFR of about 20, so evaluation and a living-donor work-up finish before dialysis is needed; a pre-emptive transplant from a living relative is the best kidney he can get. KRT education starts now (in-center and home hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, transplant, conservative care); dialysis, if it comes, starts for symptoms, not a number. Preserve suitable arm and central veins and discuss any PICC with the kidney team; access side is chosen through the individual vascular-access plan. Four negative scans at 34 do not exclude ADPKD, so the brother is confirmed unaffected, by genetic testing if needed. Why not the others: B — tolvaptan is started only at an eGFR of 25 or above, and it cannot replace a transplant plan with kidney failure a year or two away; C costs him the pre-emptive transplant; D — group I gadolinium is contraindicated below an eGFR of 30 (the nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk), and kidney volume is not today's question. Course reading: Evidence for this case

Evidence and objective for Q12

Back to Q12 · All answers in this case

Resolution and Teaching Points

Answers for this section: W1 · W2 · W3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11 · Q12

The transplant center saw him within a month. Mr. K.'s own genetic test found the family's PKD1 variant; his brother tested negative for it and cleared the donor work-up at 35. Mr. K. received his brother's kidney at 50, at an eGFR of 13, never having been dialyzed. The chart banner his nephrologist wrote when he reached G4 still travels with him: ADPKD: no NSAIDs; iodinated contrast when it changes management, with isotonic fluid if eGFR <30; gadolinium group II only; no lines in the left arm.

Other families, other patterns — the debrief table. Not every inherited kidney disease is cystic. Three more patterns to recognize — and to send for genetics or reassurance rather than round the urology circuit again:

Pattern What the urine shows Kidney function The clue outside the kidney What you do
ADPKD Isomorphic hematuria with bleeds; otherwise bland; mild albuminuria early Normal for decades, then falls Enlarged palpable kidneys, hypertension in the thirties, liver cysts, a relative with an aneurysm Ultrasound by age-based criteria; ACEi; nephrology; screen relatives from 18
Alport syndrome Persistent microhematuria from childhood, dysmorphic cells, then proteinuria Progressive — kidney failure in the twenties to thirties in affected males (often X-linked; age of progression varies) Sensorineural hearing loss (high-frequency), eye findings (anterior lenticonus); male relatives on dialysis young Audiometry, genetics referral, ACEi; do not repeat the urologic work-up
Thin basement membrane disease Isolated microhematuria, often familial, no protein, no casts Often preserved initially; some COL4A3/COL4A4-associated families develop proteinuria and CKD None — no hearing loss, no eye findings Reassure; yearly urinalysis; refer if protein or a creatinine rise appears
ADTKD (autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease) Bland — no blood, minimal protein Slowly progressive familial CKD; the age at kidney failure varies widely, even within one family Gout and high uric acid in a young person (UMOD); normal or small kidneys; cysts often absent — the old name "medullary cystic kidney disease" was retired for that reason Genetics referral; family screening; related donors must be genotyped

Clinical Pearl — Three causes of blood in a cystic kidney Bleeding into a cyst, a stone, an infection. The thermometer separates the third from the first two; the non-contrast CT separates the first two from each other. Ultrasound finds the cysts and the hydronephrosis but misses many ureteral stones — it is the screening test, not the colic test.

Clinical Pearl — The number you need depends on the age Fifteen to 39: three cysts in total. Forty to 59: two in each kidney. Sixty and over: four in each kidney. Exclusion has its own age — fewer than two cysts at 40 or older — so a negative scan at 19 is provisional. Age cuts both ways: one cyst at 38 is unremarkable, while bilateral cysts at 25 are a diagnostic question even without a family history.

Clinical Pearl — Screening is a conversation before it is a scan Eighteen or older, the relative's own decision, with the 50 % prior risk, the record and insurance consequences of a positive result, and the repeat plan after a negative one laid out first. Genetic testing is for equivocal imaging, a potential donor, family planning, or a presentation that does not fit.

Clinical Pearl — The infected cyst can have a clean urine A cyst may not communicate with the collecting system, so urine cultures can be negative despite infection. Hospitalize patients with sepsis or inability to manage safely as outpatients; obtain cultures without delaying treatment, seek cyst-penetrating therapy early and reassess persistent fever. Negative urine culture does not rule out pyelonephritis.

Clinical Pearl — The contrast rules travel with the eGFR Weigh the diagnostic benefit, agent and kidney status. Necessary IV iodinated contrast is not automatically forbidden in AKI or eGFR below 30; consider isotonic saline prophylaxis when appropriate and not contraindicated. Stable eGFR ≥30 generally carries lower risk, with selected additional precautions at 30–44. ACR–NKF and FDA-label metformin withholding policies differ; follow the stated institutional policy. When contrast MRI is needed, group II gadolinium has very low, not zero, NSF risk; avoid higher-risk agents when a suitable safer agent is available.

Pitfall — "It's the cysts" Attributing flank pain and hematuria to the polycystic kidneys without excluding a stone, or without confirming on a follow-up urinalysis that the blood actually cleared. The cysts are the reason he bleeds; they are also the reason he forms stones and gets infected, and they do not protect him from bladder cancer at 60.

Pitfall — A short oral course for a febrile man with a structural kidney Nitrofurantoin for "cystitis," or a week of an oral quinolone for "outpatient pyelo," in a rigoring man whose kidney is a bag of cysts. Complicated infections are admitted, cultured, treated intravenously, and re-imaged when they do not improve.

Answers for this section: W1 · W2 · W3 · Q4 · Q5 · Q6 · Q7 · Q8 · Q9 · Q10 · Q11 · Q12

Assigned reading: the explanations in this case and the question-linked course evidence guide. The objective map distinguishes tested decisions from concepts taught in explanations.

Concepts: ckd-08, ckd-10, ckd-21, ckd-22, ckd-24, glom-06, htn-cardiorenal-07, structural-01, structural-05, structural-09, structural-10, structural-12, structural-14, structural-15.